Ohio voters weigh legalizing recreational marijuana use
Source: Yahoo! News / Reuters
CLEVELAND (Reuters) - Ohio voters will decide Tuesday on whether to become the first Midwestern state to legalize the recreational use of marijuana, though a rival ballot measure could kill the law before it takes effect.
Issue 3 would add an amendment to the state constitution that legalizes both personal and medical use of marijuana for those over 21 years old.
The ballot initiative was the result of a campaign that gathered more than 300,000 valid voter signatures from around the state.
If it passes, Ohio would become the fifth, and largest, state to legalize the recreational usage of marijuana, following Alaska, Colorado, Washington and Oregon, as well as the District of Columbia.
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/ohio-voters-weigh-legalizing-recreational-marijuana-191327746.html
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)As the article notes later . .
"But Issue 3 also grants exclusive rights for commercial marijuana growth and distribution to 10 facilities around the state. Those facilities are owned by investors in the legalization movement."
I cannot support this, and will vote NO tomorrow
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Thanks for your support!
peace13
(11,076 posts)Best to wait. The casino issue went to the few. Pot should not be owned by ten folks.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Stryst
(714 posts)I also dislike the nearly 20,000 life altering arrests that will occur between now and the 2016 elections. My belief is that it would better to get a foot in the door, cut off the flow of lives into the for profit prison, and open up the application process down the road.
peace13
(11,076 posts)I doubt that in reality we could break the monopoly. They are already in for 15 million. Tomorrow will tell.
titaniumsalute
(4,742 posts)giving for-profit billionaire pot growers (all 10 growers) the proceeds from pot sales. The rich keep getting richer...lather, rinse, repeat. Screw that man. Not for me. Let's legalise pot the right way in Ohio.
Stryst
(714 posts)to the face of one of those 18-20 thousand people whose lives might be over? I couldn't, but my opinions don't mean anything since I don't live in Ohio.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Vote "yes" now or be prepared to wait a few years.
sorefeet
(1,241 posts)to not vote for marijuana. The rules will change and people will be safer from arrest.
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)It just matter where your priorities are.
I live less than a mile from the Ohio border, shame I can't cast a vote for it.
titaniumsalute
(4,742 posts)Giving 10 growers cart blanche on all pot growth and proceeds is simply writing more checks to the millionaires and billionares out there. Fuck that. I want pot to be legal...but not this way. Oligarchy is never acceptable.
sorefeet
(1,241 posts)It's unconstitutional. Get the stuff legal first and take it from there. Then you can make laws allowing anyone to grow for themselves.
titaniumsalute
(4,742 posts)So it would have been legal here in Ohio. Not so sure about Federal Courth though.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Not just the commercial growers.
People can open stores and processing operations.
Vote "yes" on 3 or be prepared to wait for several years.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)We finally agree on something.
titaniumsalute
(4,742 posts)And it doesn't look like we'll be waiting several years. The Ohio Assembly might just try to legalize pot instead of having this Responsible Ohio BS to take the charge again in 2016.
http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2015/11/the_2016_calculus_of_marijuana.html
starroute
(12,977 posts)But now, as he enters the final phase of his life, Nelson is gearing up for a different battle. He has been a vocal advocate of marijuana legalization for more than half a century, but he has watched the last few years unfold with a combination of joy and dread. Even as the country has softened its stance toward marijuana, a legion of large corporations has gathered to dominate the legal market. Nelson figures he has at least one good fight left. In what may be his last political act, he is declaring war on Big Pot.
<snip>
In the face of all this, investors have naturally begun piling into pot. A race is on to establish the first truly national marijuana brand. The most visible contender in this contest is probably the company Privateer Holdings, which was founded by three Silicon Valley entrepreneurs, one of whom had never smoked pot in his life but who somehow managed to persuade Bob Marleys family to license his name and image to their packaging. This spring, Privateer completed its second capital drive for a total of $82 million in start-up cash. Or maybe the rise of corporate marijuana is better illustrated by the tech millionaire Jamen Shively, who announced plans in 2013 to create a chain of pot shops modeled on Starbucks that would mint more millionaires than Microsoft acknowledging at one point, We are Big Marijuana.
Even the most ardent advocates of legalization have been troubled by the rise of Big Pot. The legalization movement is organized largely around issues of social justice, and for activists who have spent decades railing against the disproportionate impact of the drug war on poor communities, it has been unsettling to watch legalization engender a new slate of economic disparities. Alison Holcomb, who wrote the initiative to legalize recreational marijuana in Washington State, told me that a cannabis industry dominated by large corporations would threaten the core values of the legalization movement. It looks a lot like the concentration of capital that we have seen with Big Alcohol and Big Tobacco, she said. I think thats problematic for cannabis-law reformers, because it plays into our oppositions strongest argument. Holcomb pointed to the initiative in Ohio this month, where a consortium of large marijuana investors has spent about $15 million to promote legalization, while opponents have spent less than $1 million and focused not on legalization itself, but on the fact that the new law would permit only ten of those large producers to operate in the state.
The arrival of corporate marijuana also raises public-health concerns. Pot smokers might prefer to imagine their plants being raised on a sunny organic farm near Boulder, but Keith Stroup, who founded the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, points out that when big companies grow things, they tend to rely on the chemical methods of industrial agriculture. For the average little black-market grower, its done on such a small scale that theyre not even using pesticides, Stroup told me. But when youre investing millions of dollars in a large cultivation center, you can bet they are not going to take the risk of their crop getting wiped out by mold or mildew or insects.