Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MowCowWhoHow III

(2,103 posts)
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 02:55 PM Nov 2015

Flight recorders show crashed Russian jet not struck from outside - investigator

Source: Reuters

The Russian plane that crashed in Egypt was not struck from the outside and the pilot did not make a distress call before it disappeared from radar, a source in the committee analyzing the flight recorders said on Monday.

The source declined to give more details but based his comments on the preliminary examination of the black boxes recovered from the Airbus A321 which crashed in the Sinai Peninsula on Saturday killing all 224 people on board.

The Egyptian government said the black boxes were being examined by Egyptian and Russian experts along with German and French specialists from Airbus and from Ireland where the aircraft was registered. It said the search was continuing across the 9-sq-km crash site. Security sources said intelligence agencies had obtained a copy of the passenger list.

Russian officials have said the plane, carrying holidaymakers from the Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh to St Petersburg, likely broke up in mid-air but said it was too early to say what caused it to crash.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/02/us-egypt-crash-idUSKCN0SR1FH20151102

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Flight recorders show crashed Russian jet not struck from outside - investigator (Original Post) MowCowWhoHow III Nov 2015 OP
Must be an explosion on board then.... Helen Borg Nov 2015 #1
Could be weather/structural related Renew Deal Nov 2015 #3
call off the investigators! you've figured it out. CreekDog Nov 2015 #7
You betcha! Helen Borg Nov 2015 #9
Or that once repaired tail section failed. Darb Nov 2015 #2
Ditto or SoapBox Nov 2015 #4
Anonymous source says what? Warren Stupidity Nov 2015 #5
I forget his name... SoapBox Nov 2015 #8
Clearly what happened is a Ukrainian fighter landed inside the aircraft NuclearDem Nov 2015 #6

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
4. Ditto or
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 04:20 PM
Nov 2015

explosive decompression.

That story that the FO's wife related...he didn't like either the equipment at the company or that particular ship.

There are aircraft at companies even in the U.S. that crews (cockpit and cabin) hate...weird things or things that the companies don't consider "airworthiness" items, that don't get fixed. Coming to my mind, Alaska Airlines MD-80 "jack screw" American Airlines DC-10 engine mount and American again, A300 rudder.

It will be the usual project to separate the truth from the finger pointing reports.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
8. I forget his name...
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 06:05 PM
Nov 2015

A guy on MSNBC that ran through a list of many involved...Eygpt, Russia, the airline, the aircraft owner (Irish), Airbus...and there are probably more. All of those parties are probably going to slow down the investigation.

He mentioned that the tail section was found several miles away from the fuselage...tail fails off and the rest of the ship continues to travel forward.

A possibility.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Flight recorders show cra...