California appeals court rejects right-to-die lawsuit
Source: Associated Press
California appeals court rejects right-to-die lawsuit
Updated 5:42 pm, Thursday, October 29, 2015
SAN DIEGO (AP) A California appeals court on Thursday rejected a lawsuit by three terminally ill patients that sought to clear the way for doctors to prescribe fatal medication to them and others like them who want the option of taking their lives.
A state law that makes helping someone commit suicide a crime clearly applies to physicians who provide patients lethal drugs, a division of the Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled.
"We believe prescribing a lethal dose of drugs to a terminally ill patient with the knowledge the patient may use it to end his or her life goes beyond the mere giving of advice and encouragement and falls under the category of direct aiding and abetting," Associate Justice Alex McDonald wrote.
The ruling affirmed a lower court decision that dismissed the lawsuit. The lawsuit was brought against the state by Christy O'Donnell and two other terminally ill California residents.
Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/California-appeals-court-rejects-right-to-die-6599150.php
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)...life-ending drug, why couldn't he also give the patient a gun ?
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)If a doctor provided a patient a gun knowing they were going to use it to commit suicide and if a gun dealer did the same. Which one would people be screaming to change to law to exempt?
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)and loneliness, confused by drugs, and all at ridiculously expensive cost.
What a caring people we re.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)I know what real pain is. In my case, I got better but if that kind of pain I experienced went on for months, I would want to end it and be free to choose the time.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,204 posts)Unfortunately it won't go into effect soon enough to help the 3 patients. The judge is a jerk.
BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)in this matter. IMO, the appeals court is simply wrong.