Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,660 posts)
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 09:34 AM Sep 2015

Prosecution answers Durst motion to toss hotel room evidence

Source: AP

By JANET McCONNAUGHEY

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — Registering at a hotel under a false name and with phony IDs cost real estate heir Robert Durst his right to privacy there, say federal prosecutors in New Orleans.

Durst, an estranged member of the family that runs 1 World Trade Center in New York, is facing a murder trial in California in the death of his friend and onetime spokeswoman Susan Berman. He has waived extradition there.

But he's stuck in a Louisiana lockup awaiting a Jan. 11 trial on a federal charge that he illegally possessed a .38-caliber revolver after having a prior felony conviction.

The gun was found last March when Durst was detained in New Orleans. His attorneys will argue in federal court that the evidence seized in his New Orleans hotel room — where he had registered under the name Everette Ward — should be thrown out.

FULL story at link

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/99a1b4f15fff4cdc833d4a5b275ae1bc/prosecution-answers-durst-motion-toss-hotel-room-evidence

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Prosecution answers Durst motion to toss hotel room evidence (Original Post) Omaha Steve Sep 2015 OP
I wonder if he wasn't "estranged" from his wealthy family if he would be behind bars? madamvlb Sep 2015 #1
It's the Same Durst That's the Worst bucolic_frolic Sep 2015 #2
So one gives up one's Contitutional rights under the Bill o Rights 1monster Sep 2015 #3
The article says that his attorney alleges the FBI and state police searched his room before a 24601 Sep 2015 #4

bucolic_frolic

(43,182 posts)
2. It's the Same Durst That's the Worst
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 01:27 PM
Sep 2015
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Durst

Only dimly followed this in headlines over the years, it's all
the same guy ... a wife, a PR spokesman, a neighbor, patrons
of his health food store in 3 states, crossdressing, Long Island
murders, and multiple identities ... all this from the Wikipedia article.

I read about a case like his and I think he's not the only loose
cannon walking around.

1monster

(11,012 posts)
3. So one gives up one's Contitutional rights under the Bill o Rights
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 01:29 PM
Sep 2015

for using a pseudonym?

I don't know anything about Durst (unless this is the guy who inadvertantly confessed to murder in a documentary... then I'm very vaugely aware of him), but I think the prosecution's defence of the ill-gotten evidence smells like three-day-old fish.

24601

(3,962 posts)
4. The article says that his attorney alleges the FBI and state police searched his room before a
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 08:45 PM
Sep 2015

warrant was issued.

The courts have recognized over a dozen exceptions where searches do no require warrants. They include searches with consent, incident to arrest, and such routine things as when entering or leaving the country.

I don't require an exception for searching a room because the occupant may have registered in a false name. If a search is ruled illegal, the evidence is normally excluded from evidence.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Prosecution answers Durst...