Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,335 posts)
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 05:20 AM Sep 2015

New species of extinct human found in cave may rewrite history

Source: New Scientist

ONE thousand four hundred bones, 140 teeth, belonging to at least 15 individual skeletons – and that’s just what was recovered in a single short field session.

The early human fossil record isn’t normally this rich. For a century, palaeoanthropologists have generally learned to make do with slim pickings – part of a face here, a jawbone fragment there. Now, from the depths of a cave in South Africa, has come a monster cache of hominin bones from a previously unknown early species of our own genus, Homo.
...
Its skull, though, makes clear that the brain was less than half the size of ours, and more like that of some species of Homo that lived about 2 million years ago.

“It doesn’t look a lot like us,” says Berger. Even so, he and his colleagues think that, on balance, the features of the skull, hands and teeth mean the new species probably does belong in our genus. They have named it Homo naledi (eLife, DOI: 10.7554/eLife.09560).



Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22730383-700-new-species-extinct-human-found-in-cave-may-rewrite-history/



Modern humans, or Homo sapiens, are now the only living species in their genus. But as recently as 100,000 years ago, there were several other species that belonged to the genus Homo. Together with modern humans, these extinct human species, our immediate ancestors and their close relatives, are collectively referred to as ‘hominins’.

Now Berger et al. report the recent discovery of an extinct species from the genus Homo that was unearthed from deep underground in what has been named the Dinaledi Chamber, in the Rising Star cave system in South Africa. The species was named Homo naledi; ‘naledi’ means ‘star’ in Sotho (also called Sesotho), which is one of the languages spoken in South Africa.

The unearthed fossils were from at least 15 individuals and include multiple examples of most of the bones in the skeleton. Based on this wide range of specimens from a single site, Berger et al. describe Homo naledi as being similar in size and weight to a small modern human, with human-like hands and feet. Furthermore, while the skull had several unique features, it had a small braincase that was most similar in size to other early hominin species that lived between four million and two million years ago. Homo naledi's ribcage, shoulders and pelvis also more closely resembled those of earlier hominin species than those of modern humans.

The Homo naledi fossils are the largest collection of a single species of hominin that has been discovered in Africa so far and, in a related study, Dirks et al. describe the setting and context for these fossils. However, since the age of the fossils remains unclear, one of the next challenges will be to date the remains to provide more information about the early evolution of humans and their close relatives.

- See more at: http://elifesciences.org/content/4/e09560#sthash.RyWIY3gR.dpuf
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New species of extinct human found in cave may rewrite history (Original Post) muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 OP
Cool. K&R, nt. druidity33 Sep 2015 #1
I'll be interested to hear the results of radiometric dating. Thank you, muriel_volestrangler. Enthusiast Sep 2015 #2
Extraordinary find. AngryAmish Sep 2015 #3
If your distant ancestors stomped around Eurasia, sarge43 Sep 2015 #9
"...... and we have no idea what Devisonians look like!" Hoppy Sep 2015 #14
Denisovans? My recollection is they were fond of hats. tclambert Sep 2015 #27
Or maybe Denisovans. eppur_se_muova Sep 2015 #17
Fascinating, thank you. bemildred Sep 2015 #4
Brain may have adapted according to the needs of the jwirr Sep 2015 #21
Those in the know believe it was more like an arms race. sybylla Sep 2015 #23
Sounds reasonable. And at least gives us a reason why jwirr Sep 2015 #24
Yes, that's what I think. bemildred Sep 2015 #28
I wonder how the bones all ended up in the same place Android3.14 Sep 2015 #5
They do think the bodies or bones were placed there on purpose muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #6
A good place for small people to hide out. bemildred Sep 2015 #8
They were buried. bikebloke Sep 2015 #25
Solid evidence that Neanderthals buried their dead and with some ritual sarge43 Sep 2015 #11
Fascinating! K&R. nt tblue37 Sep 2015 #7
Thanx for posting Botany Sep 2015 #10
Holy moly. romanic Sep 2015 #12
What a discovery, 15 people of all ages /w a setting & context of ritual placement. Sunlei Sep 2015 #13
Very cool. My husband has always been fascinated by development of early man mnhtnbb Sep 2015 #15
I love how he recruited scientists to excavate it. progressoid Sep 2015 #16
Thanks for this additional info, progressoid! Fascinating... Peace Patriot Sep 2015 #19
Well ... *prehistory*, to split hairs. nt eppur_se_muova Sep 2015 #18
K&R! Peace Patriot Sep 2015 #20
1/2 the brain size of ours packman Sep 2015 #22
K&R! Thank You!! haikugal Sep 2015 #26
K&R. Nt JudyM Sep 2015 #29
 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
3. Extraordinary find.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 06:48 AM
Sep 2015

Not dated yet. And no word on dna.

Some humans have dna from up to 3 homonids: homo sapien sapien, Neanderthal and Devisonian. Australian Aborigibal folks have something like 6% Devisonian dna..and we have no idea what Devisonians look like!

sarge43

(28,941 posts)
9. If your distant ancestors stomped around Eurasia,
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 08:02 AM
Sep 2015

very likely you'll have some Neanderthal and Denisonian DNA

Myself: 2.5% both

Husband: 5% Denisonian, 3% Neanderthal

(Yeah, yeah, good thing we didn't have kids)

Current thinking is the Denisonians were a variation, first cousins, of Neanderthals albeit a lighter skeleton.

 

Hoppy

(3,595 posts)
14. "...... and we have no idea what Devisonians look like!"
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 08:27 AM
Sep 2015

Wrong. Just get the addresses of the executives of the R.N.C. and knock at the front doors.

eppur_se_muova

(36,274 posts)
17. Or maybe Denisovans.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 10:06 AM
Sep 2015

Named after the Denisova Cave, which is named after a hermit who once lived there.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
4. Fascinating, thank you.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 06:49 AM
Sep 2015

I am not surprised, we assume the fat brain came first but I think it came after the bipedal stance and tool using and language too most likely.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
21. Brain may have adapted according to the needs of the
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 11:40 AM
Sep 2015

time. Growing brains cells to accommodate the situation.

sybylla

(8,519 posts)
23. Those in the know believe it was more like an arms race.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 01:54 PM
Sep 2015

Developing brains in fetuses and small children require a high fat diet (the reason toddlers should never be given low fat milk). A high fat diet is hard to accomplish when your diet is scavenged berries, bugs, and leaves. As the diet improved, the brain grew bigger, as the brain grew bigger, we developed new ways to acquire food. A kind of "arms race."

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
24. Sounds reasonable. And at least gives us a reason why
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 02:00 PM
Sep 2015

the brain was a different size. Likewise the size of these skeletons compared to later skeletons.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
28. Yes, that's what I think.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 03:45 PM
Sep 2015

Hypertrophy resulting from intra-species (well really intra-genus) competition.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
5. I wonder how the bones all ended up in the same place
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 07:00 AM
Sep 2015

Did the group experience a large disaster such as an infectious fatal disease, or did they have some sort of practice of placing dead members in the location?

muriel_volestrangler

(101,335 posts)
6. They do think the bodies or bones were placed there on purpose
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 07:10 AM
Sep 2015

It's a long way in - 70 metres from the entrance, and then down a 12 meter vertical shaft.

bikebloke

(5,260 posts)
25. They were buried.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 02:06 PM
Sep 2015

They didn't die together from some cataclysm, but were placed there. Which makes it a great find.

sarge43

(28,941 posts)
11. Solid evidence that Neanderthals buried their dead and with some ritual
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 08:12 AM
Sep 2015

Some evidence that H. heidelbergensis, direct ancestor of Neanderthals, Denisovans and modern humans, may have. So it's been going on for a long time. Plus, it made sense. Dead exposed bodies would attract predators

mnhtnbb

(31,397 posts)
15. Very cool. My husband has always been fascinated by development of early man
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 08:41 AM
Sep 2015

and he went on the trip of a lifetime in 2012--a National Geographic trip--to Africa
that was devoted to following the early history of man. It was led by
Donald Johanson, the paleoanthropologist who found "Lucy".

Hubby is going to be very interested in this. Thanks for posting!

progressoid

(49,992 posts)
16. I love how he recruited scientists to excavate it.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 09:12 AM
Sep 2015
And he advertised for research assistants on Facebook — for skinny scientists who weren't claustrophobic. Six women took the job.

They worked in the chamber almost like spacewalkers, communicating with researchers outside, via cameras and about 2 miles of fiber optic cable. The team in the chamber used paintbrushes and toothpicks to gently unearth fossil bones — there were more than 1,550 of them, an incredible treasure trove. The researchers describe their find Thursday in a journal called eLife.

"Often I was wondering, 'How on Earth are we going to get that fossil out?' because the density of bones in that chamber was so great, it was like a puzzle to get each fossil out," says Becca Peixotto, one of the scientist-cavers and a doctoral student in anthropology at American University.



http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/09/10/437249183/south-african-cave-yields-strange-bones-of-early-human-like-species


Also, National Geographic has some great videos etc on their website about the expedition.

http://voices.nationalgeographic.com/blog/rising-star-expedition/?order=asc


Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
19. Thanks for this additional info, progressoid! Fascinating...
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 11:17 AM
Sep 2015

...that the bones are buried so deep in a cave! What could these long-ago people have been up to? Why did they die there (or why were their bodies or bones taken there) so far from the surface? I'm also amazed at the intrepid researchers, who are maybe replicating the efforts and even the motives (exploration?) of the early humans.

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
22. 1/2 the brain size of ours
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 12:09 PM
Sep 2015

Now we know where the ancestors of Republicans came from - what an eureka moment

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New species of extinct hu...