New species of extinct human found in cave may rewrite history
Source: New Scientist
ONE thousand four hundred bones, 140 teeth, belonging to at least 15 individual skeletons and thats just what was recovered in a single short field session.
The early human fossil record isnt normally this rich. For a century, palaeoanthropologists have generally learned to make do with slim pickings part of a face here, a jawbone fragment there. Now, from the depths of a cave in South Africa, has come a monster cache of hominin bones from a previously unknown early species of our own genus, Homo.
...
Its skull, though, makes clear that the brain was less than half the size of ours, and more like that of some species of Homo that lived about 2 million years ago.
It doesnt look a lot like us, says Berger. Even so, he and his colleagues think that, on balance, the features of the skull, hands and teeth mean the new species probably does belong in our genus. They have named it Homo naledi (eLife, DOI: 10.7554/eLife.09560).
Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22730383-700-new-species-extinct-human-found-in-cave-may-rewrite-history/
Now Berger et al. report the recent discovery of an extinct species from the genus Homo that was unearthed from deep underground in what has been named the Dinaledi Chamber, in the Rising Star cave system in South Africa. The species was named Homo naledi; naledi means star in Sotho (also called Sesotho), which is one of the languages spoken in South Africa.
The unearthed fossils were from at least 15 individuals and include multiple examples of most of the bones in the skeleton. Based on this wide range of specimens from a single site, Berger et al. describe Homo naledi as being similar in size and weight to a small modern human, with human-like hands and feet. Furthermore, while the skull had several unique features, it had a small braincase that was most similar in size to other early hominin species that lived between four million and two million years ago. Homo naledi's ribcage, shoulders and pelvis also more closely resembled those of earlier hominin species than those of modern humans.
The Homo naledi fossils are the largest collection of a single species of hominin that has been discovered in Africa so far and, in a related study, Dirks et al. describe the setting and context for these fossils. However, since the age of the fossils remains unclear, one of the next challenges will be to date the remains to provide more information about the early evolution of humans and their close relatives.
- See more at: http://elifesciences.org/content/4/e09560#sthash.RyWIY3gR.dpuf
druidity33
(6,446 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)Not dated yet. And no word on dna.
Some humans have dna from up to 3 homonids: homo sapien sapien, Neanderthal and Devisonian. Australian Aborigibal folks have something like 6% Devisonian dna..and we have no idea what Devisonians look like!
sarge43
(28,941 posts)very likely you'll have some Neanderthal and Denisonian DNA
Myself: 2.5% both
Husband: 5% Denisonian, 3% Neanderthal
(Yeah, yeah, good thing we didn't have kids)
Current thinking is the Denisonians were a variation, first cousins, of Neanderthals albeit a lighter skeleton.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)Wrong. Just get the addresses of the executives of the R.N.C. and knock at the front doors.
tclambert
(11,087 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,274 posts)Named after the Denisova Cave, which is named after a hermit who once lived there.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I am not surprised, we assume the fat brain came first but I think it came after the bipedal stance and tool using and language too most likely.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)time. Growing brains cells to accommodate the situation.
sybylla
(8,519 posts)Developing brains in fetuses and small children require a high fat diet (the reason toddlers should never be given low fat milk). A high fat diet is hard to accomplish when your diet is scavenged berries, bugs, and leaves. As the diet improved, the brain grew bigger, as the brain grew bigger, we developed new ways to acquire food. A kind of "arms race."
jwirr
(39,215 posts)the brain was a different size. Likewise the size of these skeletons compared to later skeletons.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Hypertrophy resulting from intra-species (well really intra-genus) competition.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Did the group experience a large disaster such as an infectious fatal disease, or did they have some sort of practice of placing dead members in the location?
muriel_volestrangler
(101,335 posts)It's a long way in - 70 metres from the entrance, and then down a 12 meter vertical shaft.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)The dating is going to be very interesting.
bikebloke
(5,260 posts)They didn't die together from some cataclysm, but were placed there. Which makes it a great find.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)Some evidence that H. heidelbergensis, direct ancestor of Neanderthals, Denisovans and modern humans, may have. So it's been going on for a long time. Plus, it made sense. Dead exposed bodies would attract predators
tblue37
(65,457 posts)Botany
(70,539 posts)nice stuff!
romanic
(2,841 posts)Very interesting, thanks for posting.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)No items yet?
mnhtnbb
(31,397 posts)and he went on the trip of a lifetime in 2012--a National Geographic trip--to Africa
that was devoted to following the early history of man. It was led by
Donald Johanson, the paleoanthropologist who found "Lucy".
Hubby is going to be very interested in this. Thanks for posting!
progressoid
(49,992 posts)They worked in the chamber almost like spacewalkers, communicating with researchers outside, via cameras and about 2 miles of fiber optic cable. The team in the chamber used paintbrushes and toothpicks to gently unearth fossil bones there were more than 1,550 of them, an incredible treasure trove. The researchers describe their find Thursday in a journal called eLife.
"Often I was wondering, 'How on Earth are we going to get that fossil out?' because the density of bones in that chamber was so great, it was like a puzzle to get each fossil out," says Becca Peixotto, one of the scientist-cavers and a doctoral student in anthropology at American University.
http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/09/10/437249183/south-african-cave-yields-strange-bones-of-early-human-like-species
Also, National Geographic has some great videos etc on their website about the expedition.
http://voices.nationalgeographic.com/blog/rising-star-expedition/?order=asc
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)...that the bones are buried so deep in a cave! What could these long-ago people have been up to? Why did they die there (or why were their bodies or bones taken there) so far from the surface? I'm also amazed at the intrepid researchers, who are maybe replicating the efforts and even the motives (exploration?) of the early humans.
eppur_se_muova
(36,274 posts)Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)packman
(16,296 posts)Now we know where the ancestors of Republicans came from - what an eureka moment