We asked all 22 presidential candidates to define a US refugee policy. Few had clear answers
Source: The Guardian
Last week, the Guardian contacted the campaigns of every candidate for the White House 17 Republicans and five Democrats to ask two questions. Should the US be accepting more refugees? And, as president, how would each candidate define US policy toward those seeking asylum from war-torn and impoverished countries?
But even as presidential candidates offer foreign policy pitches through a lens of moral leadership, just one of 22 contenders former Maryland governor Martin OMalley said unequivocally that the US should take in more refugees and put forward a specific number. In a statement issued on Thursday, the Democrat called on the government to accept 65,000 refugees from Syria over the next year.
If Germany a country with one-fourth our population can accept 800,000 refugees this year, certainly we the nation of immigrants and refugees can do more, OMalley said in a statement.
Wisconsin governor Scott Walker, a Republican, suggested on Sunday that no additional refugees should be taken in until the US contends with the threat posed by the Islamic State.
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/07/refugee-crisis-immigration-us-presidential-candidates?CMP=ema_565
forest444
(5,902 posts)elleng
(130,974 posts)that the US should take in more refugees and put forward a specific number. In a statement issued on Thursday, the Democrat called on the government to accept 65,000 refugees from Syria over the next year.
If Germany a country with one-fourth our population can accept 800,000 refugees this year, certainly we the nation of immigrants and refugees can do more, OMalley said in a statement.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)HappyPlace
(568 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)Straight talk and plain speaking - with that progressive fire - every time.
msnbc's corporate sponsors no likey.