Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,656 posts)
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 02:46 PM Aug 2015

Board Issues Decision in Browning-Ferris Industries

Source: NLRB

In a 3-2 decision involving Browning-Ferris Industries of California, the National Labor Relations Board refined its standard for determining joint-employer status. The revised standard is designed “to better effectuate the purposes of the Act in the current economic landscape.” With more than 2.87 million of the nation’s workers employed through temporary agencies in August 2014, the Board held that its previous joint employer standard has failed to keep pace with changes in the workplace and economic circumstances.

In the decision, the Board applies long-established principles to find that two or more entities are joint employers of a single workforce if (1) they are both employers within the meaning of the common law; and (2) they share or codetermine those matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment. In evaluating whether an employer possesses sufficient control over employees to qualify as a joint employer, the Board will – among other factors -- consider whether an employer has exercised control over terms and conditions of employment indirectly through an intermediary, or whether it has reserved the authority to do so.

In its decision, the Board found that BFI was a joint employer with Leadpoint, the company that supplied employees to BFI to perform various work functions for BFI, including cleaning and sorting of recycled products. In finding that BFI was a joint employer with Leadpoint, the Board relied on indirect and direct control that BFI possessed over essential terms and conditions of employment of the employees supplied by Leadpoint as well as BFI’s reserved authority to control such terms and conditions.

The Board ordered that within 14 days the ballots that were impounded on April 25, 2014 shall be counted and the appropriate certification issued.

Board Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce was joined by Members Kent Y. Hirozawa and Lauren McFerran in the majority opinion; Members Philip A. Miscimarra and Harry I. Johnson III dissented.

Copyright exempt.

publicinfo@nlrb.gov (link sends e-mail)
www.nlrb.gov

August 27, 2015


Read more: https://www.nlrb.gov/news-outreach/news-story/board-issues-decision-browning-ferris-industries



I believe this will make it easier to unionize McDonald's employees!!!

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Board Issues Decision in Browning-Ferris Industries (Original Post) Omaha Steve Aug 2015 OP
"or whether it has reserved the authority to do so" < this seems important, and provides good jtuck004 Aug 2015 #1
Yes!!!!!! About time the NLRB grew a pair. Wellstone ruled Aug 2015 #2
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
1. "or whether it has reserved the authority to do so" < this seems important, and provides good
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 03:08 PM
Aug 2015

leverage.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
2. Yes!!!!!! About time the NLRB grew a pair.
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 04:34 PM
Aug 2015

Finally a Labor ruling that is overturned from the Raygun years. Double breasting contacts will now come under challenge. About time. No more 1972 to 1980 weak sister deals. This is Historic. Watch out Wal Mart cause you and other retail wholesale warehouses are next.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Board Issues Decision in ...