Colorado Court Rules Against Baker Who Refused to Serve Same-Sex Couples
Source: New York Times
A state appeals court in Colorado ruled Thursday that a baker could not cite religious beliefs in refusing to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples.
The decision is the latest in a series of similar rulings across the country that have been cheered by civil rights groups but attacked by conservative Christians as assaults on religious liberty.
Whether photographers, florists, bakers and other vendors who are Christians should have a right to refuse services for same-sex marriages has emerged as a major cultural and legal battle, one that has intensified since the Supreme Court decision in June establishing same-sex marriage as a constitutional right.
In the Colorado case, the court squarely said that this is discrimination based on sexual orientation and its not to be tolerated, even if its motivated by faith, said Louise Melling, deputy legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented the gay couple. Religious liberty gives you the right to your beliefs but not the right to harm others.
<more>
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/14/us/colorado-court-rules-against-baker-who-refused-to-serve-same-sex-couples.html?_r=0
Gothmog
(145,375 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)"They'll force Jewish delis to serve bacon." "They'll force my church to perform gay weddings." No, they will not. Any more than they will force Republicans to think.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)served bacon to Gentiles but refused to serve it to Jews, there would be a problem. If churches charged a fee for weddings on tax exempt property and excluded gays, there would be a problem. If Republicans could think, there would be no problem.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)I'm old enough to remember when that included Catholic and Protestant.
rurallib
(62,431 posts)I had one of those and both sets of parents worked on us until we finally split. Then they couldn't understand why.
didn't mean a dig at you at all. I had pretty much forgotten all about the constant picking etc.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Well I'm not sure, probably not all Protestant sects but many.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)It was a white bride and a Latino groom.
My talking "paramedic" caused mass panic that her faking it would be exposed.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)The money in a gay person's hand is green and spends just as well as the money in a straight person's hand.
I know this for a fact.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)had their way, gay people would be required to use rainbow colored money, and it would be discounted.
OnlinePoker
(5,723 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)As I see it if you are open to the public as a store,
you cannot choose customers, but you can choose
what you want to sell.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)I despise terrorists ... but if one came in my ER wounded or sick, I'd do everything possible to save the mofo's life and make him/her comfortable. The person's terrorism is for other people so empowered to deal with - not my job.
Volaris
(10,273 posts)If its a for-profit business, then you'll take the profit from whoever walks through the door.
If there are things more IMPORTANT than profit (not likely if your a Republican) then every thin dime u make had better be given away to charity, because you're a Not For Profit Organization.
If you think you should be able to have your cake and it too, then the rest of us can TAX YOUR CHURCH.
BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE AN INFRIGEMTNT OF YOUR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, YOU FUCKHEADS!!!
RancidCrabtree
(24 posts)or Religous Freedom is nothing more than the new race card.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)want to eat it? I wouldn't for the same reason I never send anything back at a restaurant.
riversedge
(70,259 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Although I would be ok with an exemption for a business as long as they were required to post some sort of "I am a bigot who refuses to serve xxx" sign up- so I know where to never spend my money.