Hillary Clinton starts taking some risks — and landing some punches
Source: washingtonpost
By Anne Gearan August 9 at 3:50 PM
After months of remaining largely above the partisan fray and often appearing cautious to a fault Hillary Rodham Clinton has begun taking more risks and landing some punches against Republicans.
....................
Republicans are systematically .?.?. trying to stop millions of American citizens from voting, Clinton wrote in a Twitter message Thursday typical of her recent postings. What part of democracy are they afraid of?
The Clinton campaign also made a surprise release of her health and tax information late last month on the same day as a very public airing in the home state of Bush and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) of her policy reversal on U.S. relations with Cuba.
The Clinton team mounted a preemptive spin campaign ahead of last weeks maiden Republican debate and then invited reporters covering her to watch the two-hour debate at Clintons Brooklyn headquarters......................
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/after-months-of-caution-and-slipping-poll-numbers-clinton-goes-on-offense/2015/08/09/e2447744-3ca9-11e5-9c2d-ed991d848c48_story.html
Keep punching gal.
?uuid=xPrQSj7SEeWeS8dUKJq2Lw
Hillary Clintons aggressive approach of late is aimed in part at answering one of Democratic activists regular complaints about her: that despite posturing as a fighter, she has rarely taken the gloves off. (Mario Anzuoni/Reuters)
NanceGreggs
(27,816 posts)A Democrat who understands that the real enemy is the GOP.
villager
(26,001 posts)n/t
I say, WHOO HOO!
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)ffr
(22,671 posts)The Clintons have had to become pros at it.
I'd love nothing more than for all the Dem candidates to come together with this understanding!
It should not be about Hillary or Bernie or O'Mally (sp?), but about what we stand for as Dems, versus the absolute debacle that is the GOP!
As a Bernie Supporter, I'm happy to rec this!
treestar
(82,383 posts)Cha
(297,446 posts)Mahalo riversedge~
William769
(55,147 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)I'm not going to bother to correct them, they meant it as a rhetorical question.
BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)always needing to qualify praise of Hillary in some way:
which is likely the only part of the article her detractors will focus on.
As a lot of us know, there is a LOT going on behind the scenes, and Hillary is indeed a fighter. And as another poster mentions above, she sees the Rs as the real enemy.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)I mean, how to cut out a states voter control,for any elected who will work at the Federal Gov. level?
Mrs. Clinton brings up an important issue- republicans do strive to make it harder for some people to cast their one vote
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Then when the GOP tried to stop them it would b e a federal civil rights issue.
4dsc
(5,787 posts)No mention of TPP or Keystone or $15 minimum wage or protesting Social Security,
George II
(67,782 posts)She addressed TPP in an appearance in Iowa in June
She rightfully has decided to NOT criticize her President on the Keystone pipeline, but it's a moot point because Obama has vetoed it
AND, she's said at least three times that she supports those working to achieve a $15 an hour minimum wage.
It's all out there, people just have to read it. "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink it!"
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)And, when has Hillary said she supports a $15 an hour minimum wage? Do you have a link, or was that line about leading a horse just something snarky that you thought sounded slick?
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)are not allowed to have opinions that might be different than their former boss
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)If these are false, could you provide the links? I've been waiting for a stance from her on the TPP and Keystone for a long time.
Response to 4dsc (Reply #8)
Amimnoch This message was self-deleted by its author.
demwing
(16,916 posts)i guess those issues are fairy tales, right?
And why the slur? Completely uncalled for...
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)The venom with which SOME on your side have been atacking my candidate has left me bitter and jaded. In return I allowed myself to reduce myself to the same kind of condecending and base attacks.
Neither of our candidates or the people who believe in them deserve it. So I'm going back, and removing the few bitter and insulting posts i've made.
demwing
(16,916 posts)kudos to you, and here's to a more perfect union
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Through the primary season, we may not be able to all agree on which one is best for it, but I do think we can all agree that a (D) will ALWAYS be better than an (R).
George II
(67,782 posts)...her husband received the nomintion in 1992, probably long before that.
She's just smart, which I and others have pointed out here before. She doesn't react or over-react, she thinks things out and THEN makes her comments.
Some here will attack her and say she's checking which way the wind is blowing, but that's totally ludicrous. I'd much rather have a thinking, well-reasoned President than a capricous one.
oasis
(49,395 posts)candelista
(1,986 posts)Frances
(8,546 posts)The Post hated the Clintons.
When Bill Clinton won his first presidential election, the Style section wrote about his daughter Chelsea, who was a very young teen. The Post said Chelsea had fat legs.
I've never forgotten that low blow to a vulnerable young girl.
And I have not forgotten how the Post handled the Lewinsky business either. It was totally anti-Clinton all during Bill Clinton's Presidency.
And the Post was pro-George W Bush all during that nightmare of an election. I think the reporters were told not to question the Supreme Court's decision handing Bush the Presidency.
candelista
(1,986 posts)Just to refute people like you.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)every post praising Bernie Sanders is hard, solid journalism. No puff pieces whatsoever.
Javaman
(62,531 posts)but it took the threat from Bernie for her to say them.
In the long run, while I support Bernie, if he changes the conversation and brings the Democratic party back to the left, than that's all that matters.
now she can talk the talk, but can she walk the walk? Bernie has been doing that walk for the past 50+ years.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Hard to find anything about the Ron Paul of the Left that isn't a puff piece.
RussBLib
(9,027 posts)more please
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)Tweeting negatives about opposing Party.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)If this is part of a coordinated attack on the part of Clinton, Obama, Democratic legislators on the GOP.
I think in order to be effective IF she wins she needs to vanquish quite a number of GOP legislators when she comes in in 2016.
Dems are going to have to work together to do this because it can't happen in a non presidential year I don't think.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Not whining and tucking tail between legs and running away from confrontation - LOL
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Hotler
(11,437 posts)throwing punches at the crooks on Wall St.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Gothmog
(145,433 posts)This campaign is very different from the 2008 campaign
ericson00
(2,707 posts)as Obama has been making it great again, after Bush made it not great. Hillary will finish the best parts of O's job, and improve on others.