Anti-Abortion Extremist Will Stand Trial for Threatening a Provider
Source: by Feminist Newswire
Anti-Abortion Extremist Will Stand Trial for Threatening a Provider
by Feminist Newswire on Aug 3, 2015 11:25 AM
In a powerful decision for abortion providers being threatened by extremists, the 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals found in a 2-1 ruling that a jury not a judge should determine whether or not a 2011 letter Angel Dillard sent to Dr. Mila Means constitutes a true threat actionable under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act. The ruling overturns a lower courts summary decision that Dillards letter was constitutionally protected free speech.
This decision sends a critical message to extremists across the country, said Feminist Majority Foundation National Clinic Access Project director duVergne Gaines. The law is clear: threatening abortion providers with stalking, car bombs and murder is not protected speech under the First Amendment. The decision strongly reinforces the integrity of FACE and its use to stop threats and other conduct designed to terrorize and intimidate providers and patients. We applaud the Department of Justices commitment to prosecute extremists like Dillard and protect abortion providers across the country.
The Department of Justice brought a civil FACE lawsuit against Dillard after she sent a threatening letter to Dr. Means, a family practitioner who was in training to provide abortions in Wichita. We will not let this abomination continue without doing everything we can to stop it, Dillard wrote. You will be checking under your car everyday because maybe today is the day someone places an explosive under it. At the time the letter was sent, abortion services had not been available in Wichita since May of 2009, when Dr. George Tiller was murdered by anti-abortion extremist Scott Roeder.
The Appeals court decision corrected the lower courts two key findings when granting summary judgment for Dillard, stating that it did not matter that the threats contained in Dillards letter were conditional because many true threats are conditional and are not protected by the First Amendment. Secondly, the Appeals court stated it did not matter whether or not Dillard intended to carry out the threats contained in her letter; the letter could still be construed by a jury to intentionally threaten and intimidate Dr. Means out of providing safe legal abortions......................
Read more: http://feminist.org/blog/index.php/2015/08/03/kansas-anti-abortion-extremist-to-stand-trial-for-threats-made-against-doctor/
So good to see this when there is such bad news all around about Planned Parenthood
A Kansas anti-abortion extremist will have to stand trial for threats made against a doctor planning to provide abortions, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday.
via Shutterstock