Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:29 AM Jul 2015

Experts: Report shows Sandra Bland may have used pot in jail

Last edited Tue Jul 28, 2015, 02:46 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: Associated Press Update - Proper Link

The amount of THC, one of the active components of marijuana, in Bland's system was 18 micrograms per liter, according to the report released Monday. That's more than three times the legal limit for drivers in Colorado and Washington, states that permit the recreational use of marijuana.

Robert Johnson, chief toxicologist at the Tarrant County medical examiner's office in Fort Worth, Texas, told the AP that a THC level as high as Bland's suggests she "either had access to the drug in jail or she was a consistent user of the drug and her body had accumulated THC to the point that it was slowly releasing it over time."

But, Johnson added, "I have never seen a report in the literature or from any other source of residual THC that high three days after someone stops using the drug."

{University of Florida toxicology professor Bruce Goldberger, who reviewed the report for The Associated Press} noted that while chronic users who stop using the drug will have higher concentrations than non- chronic users, "the concentrations do not persist at this level, at least in my opinion." He defined chronic as someone who uses cannabis daily, sometimes repeatedly.

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/9287eef889d94385bca932a79e247e2c/experts-report-shows-sandra-bland-may-have-used-pot-jail



Moi has been saying

[font color=white]----------[/font]and sayin.....

[font color=white]-------------------[/font]and Sayin.......


that the only way for Sandra Bland to be "asphyxiated" and show no signs of fighting the strangulation
[center]
is that of Sandy being doped.....
[/center]
[br][br]

[font size=6]
UPDATE
[/font]

Originally, I posted the Fox News retell of AP's story; because Fox failed to link properly from theirs (HERE)
139 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Experts: Report shows Sandra Bland may have used pot in jail (Original Post) laserhaas Jul 2015 OP
Actually, Fox is not a news source. shraby Jul 2015 #1
It came from AP - but Fox doesn't (properly) link to the AP story laserhaas Jul 2015 #3
exactly! n/t wildbilln864 Jul 2015 #5
I'd be interested to see if it's JackInGreen Jul 2015 #8
JackInGreen - Please explain, in further detail - to us non-tokers laserhaas Jul 2015 #14
When it's fight or flight SCVDem Jul 2015 #48
That's my opinion - also. As remarked in my comments below and elsewhere laserhaas Jul 2015 #50
MOI wants to know if they did DNA swabs of the purported hang noose laserhaas Jul 2015 #113
Its an Associated Press press story unless fox has taken to to posting cstanleytech Jul 2015 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author d_legendary1 Jul 2015 #2
Stop hating the source - and LOOK at the dam fact I posted from within the story laserhaas Jul 2015 #7
The source is a cesspool of propaganda...why should we have to sort through such a source? Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #9
Fred - THE source is actually AP - Fox is just the ONLY link I can find to the AP story laserhaas Jul 2015 #32
Not to take away from your point JackInGreen Jul 2015 #10
Definition of Poison is The Most Apropos - it totally explains how Sandy was murdered laserhaas Jul 2015 #16
But it didn't.... JackInGreen Jul 2015 #17
NOT poisoned To DEATH - Just enough toxic poisoning to make one IMPAIRED laserhaas Jul 2015 #19
Legally it is poisoning. JimDandy Jul 2015 #64
Many of us often misconstrue terms and/or coin of phrases. laserhaas Jul 2015 #66
This message was self-deleted by its author d_legendary1 Jul 2015 #34
So why derail this thread with an argument over source? Maedhros Jul 2015 #83
Orginally the source came from Fixed News d_legendary1 Jul 2015 #90
NO need to do so - laserhaas Jul 2015 #93
Already did. No worries d_legendary1 Jul 2015 #121
Colorado and Washington state have a ridiculously low Eric J in MN Jul 2015 #4
Something is really rotten about this. BillZBubb Jul 2015 #6
That's the whole point. Facts and outcome - DON"T ADD UP - U N L E S S... Sandy was laserhaas Jul 2015 #11
I see your point, but have to pose this question: Maedhros Jul 2015 #84
If it worked - than the "ineffective" argue is moot. laserhaas Jul 2015 #94
I could see it. [n/t] Maedhros Jul 2015 #106
This marijuana 'issue' is a red herring.... blackspade Jul 2015 #13
you nailed it! thanks. n/t wildbilln864 Jul 2015 #76
I would argue to the contrary. Weed didn't kill her; but it made her easier to suicide. laserhaas Jul 2015 #95
No, the pot issue is being used to demonize her. blackspade Jul 2015 #99
Yes... that was Fox News intention; but it is back firing. laserhaas Jul 2015 #102
How did they force that much pot into her? arcane1 Jul 2015 #107
I think her blood test was normal result for average 'user'? the test is to sensitive so authorities Sunlei Jul 2015 #111
Yeah... like weed makes you worse than on LSD - laserhaas Jul 2015 #116
fox is just an arm of the republican party and Rs dislike about 50% plus of Americans Sunlei Jul 2015 #119
everybody knows.... Cryptoad Jul 2015 #15
The dashcam-vid was edited and this is the toxicology report of the "defective" autopsy. Go figure. DetlefK Jul 2015 #18
Of that remark - pathological tyrants losing track of what is real laserhaas Jul 2015 #22
maybe they gave her some evidence eatables they seized from one of their car traffic stop searches?? Sunlei Jul 2015 #20
That's the type of facts we need to know 'Sunlei' - Can you put up a GD thread of more details. laserhaas Jul 2015 #24
no I can't my only trip to Colorado, I ate the evidence. sorry. Sunlei Jul 2015 #27
HA HA ---- okay laserhaas Jul 2015 #29
I don't 'use' either. I did want to try legal Co. pot.I can report that 2 treats made me so relaxed, Sunlei Jul 2015 #55
Thom Hartmann mentioned the other day that she refused breakfast the morning of her death. nt Snotcicles Jul 2015 #21
one doesn't eat and THC stored in body fat is released into blood & stupid pot test picks up. Sunlei Jul 2015 #25
Why did she refuse breakfast? == Who disclosed such a (purported) fact? laserhaas Jul 2015 #28
I don't recall who he his source was, he was wondering if her meal the night before Snotcicles Jul 2015 #35
Again - that's a REAL possibility.... If she new they were tampering with her food laserhaas Jul 2015 #37
or perhaps after 3 full days in jail she was demoralized enough, exausted enough, to want to die. Sunlei Jul 2015 #23
I've been researching for a thread on that premise - laserhaas Jul 2015 #26
Thats possible but there are possibilities as well and to be fair cstanleytech Jul 2015 #31
That's the basis of my upcoming GD thread - what happened, possibilities laserhaas Jul 2015 #36
I recommend reading the posts by Lee-Lee over here cstanleytech Jul 2015 #39
Not a "lawful order". anyone with eyes and ears and a mild familiarity with the law that saw the video know that...why do you not? Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author cstanleytech Jul 2015 #43
The purported leap of logic fails Fred. No one is "championing" the RW... In fact I'm doing the laserhaas Jul 2015 #44
I'm not championing any talking points, what I am doing is what I am allowed which is to have cstanleytech Jul 2015 #45
You prefer making excuses for the cop, I prefer justice for Sarah Bland, we all see the difference. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #47
"I prefer justice for Sarah Bland" No, I dont think you do. cstanleytech Jul 2015 #54
Fred and cstanley - Can't we just get along? No need to get up at each other - We are against THEM laserhaas Jul 2015 #56
Fair enough. cstanleytech Jul 2015 #59
Never said it was "written" by Fox laserhaas Jul 2015 #61
I'm amazed that one would think there'd be a need for further review - on the firing issue. laserhaas Jul 2015 #42
the order to put out the cigarette KT2000 Jul 2015 #80
Concur KT2000 - their job is to keep the peace (mitigate) laserhaas Jul 2015 #89
Well Lee explained that the courts allow officers alot of leeway when it comes a stop like this and cstanleytech Jul 2015 #109
That's not the only thing he did. msrizzo Jul 2015 #127
True enough but that is what got the ball rolling with her refusing to comply with cstanleytech Jul 2015 #129
the reason he should be fired KT2000 Jul 2015 #133
Correct. If it was Palin's daughter - they'd want him strung up. laserhaas Jul 2015 #134
I am not sure about 100% anymore either now that I have seen the tape a few more times. cstanleytech Jul 2015 #136
it was before he told her KT2000 Jul 2015 #137
Well I am not disagreeing with you because yes he probably could have cstanleytech Jul 2015 #138
new job was toast. She had a serious Felony charge. First thing in jail is strip Naked for ? to see Sunlei Jul 2015 #103
That's one thing that is most disturbing. There's be no PR from the institution laserhaas Jul 2015 #105
Her Sister agreed to post bond. NOLALady Jul 2015 #60
WOW - if that be true NOLALady - there'd be almost no logical reason for the suicide laserhaas Jul 2015 #62
I've wondered by her parents did 840high Jul 2015 #79
SOmeone in the comments here - said her sister had committed to doing so. laserhaas Jul 2015 #96
Thanks. 840high Jul 2015 #130
Also keep in mind that she had epilepsy and was taking medication for it n8dogg83 Jul 2015 #101
As for me, I'm hoping Doctor Baden gets involved laserhaas Jul 2015 #30
That's what's needed. An outside investigation with no one from Texas shraby Jul 2015 #38
"She would have needed a way to get her feet/body clear of the floor. How did she accomplish that?" cstanleytech Jul 2015 #41
So - this (scientifically) points to the key question(s) laserhaas Jul 2015 #46
Not easy but also not impossible it just depends on how she did it. cstanleytech Jul 2015 #49
My bet is just the opposite.. There was no attempt at reviving.. NONE laserhaas Jul 2015 #51
You are forgetting something, remember the sheriff saying they had documents where she admitted to cstanleytech Jul 2015 #57
That's why moi ended with "OOPs" laserhaas Jul 2015 #58
Her right arm was injured in the arrest, could she do all that one-armed? Lars39 Jul 2015 #69
Correct Lars39 - Many - M A N Y, questions that need answering laserhaas Jul 2015 #71
A most recent injured arm (if that be the case) would be excruciating laserhaas Jul 2015 #75
She told her friend on the phone that she thought her shoulder might be broken. nt tblue37 Jul 2015 #81
Just because someone might have only one arm does not mean a cripple who cannot do anything cstanleytech Jul 2015 #72
Doesn't mean she could. A lot of people aren't able to much of anything with non-dominant arm, hand. Lars39 Jul 2015 #73
It doesnt mean she couldnt either. cstanleytech Jul 2015 #74
what if they 'made her stand' next that metal pole somehow & tied a lg trash bag around her neck to Sunlei Jul 2015 #108
Thats something they should investigate of course to rule it out cstanleytech Jul 2015 #112
All good questions - especially when you see the noose laserhaas Jul 2015 #114
Well they should test the bags to see if plausible cstanleytech Jul 2015 #117
whos the 'they' to investigate? They already stated the last check was against policy, the lazy pol Sunlei Jul 2015 #115
FBI and the DOJ are the two main federal agencies who would probable be looking into that cstanleytech Jul 2015 #118
Think that cell is protected by fbi and doj right now as a crime scene? It will take them years. Sunlei Jul 2015 #120
No, a trashbag was on the can atleast in photos not in it or atleast cstanleytech Jul 2015 #123
you. your're right. I think we're on the same page here. Sunlei Jul 2015 #125
Speculation is futile but... msrizzo Jul 2015 #128
Why use more if you dont need it or want it? cstanleytech Jul 2015 #132
I thought they said she did it with a plastic bag? notadmblnd Jul 2015 #100
I'm researching the original PR's for my GD thread. laserhaas Jul 2015 #104
police posted 'cell evidence photo' showed the bag neatly in the wastepaper basket. Sunlei Jul 2015 #110
Where's experts like Cheech and Chong - laserhaas Jul 2015 #33
Here's the AP article. drm604 Jul 2015 #52
Is it proper protocol for me to edit the posting and link to AP (instead)? laserhaas Jul 2015 #53
I don't make the rules around here, but I don't see why not. drm604 Jul 2015 #86
Well... I did the switch --- and we'll see if anyone alerts me of a protocol controlling laserhaas Jul 2015 #87
could not agree more here ellennelle Jul 2015 #63
Nice to see ya again 'ellennelle' - As always - Spot On! laserhaas Jul 2015 #65
This message was self-deleted by its author olddots Jul 2015 #67
She deserved to die because chapdrum Jul 2015 #68
That's the Faux not-news point of contention; but we're turning that on its head. laserhaas Jul 2015 #70
Sandra was alone in her cell..I can't understand how she would have acquired MJ in that jail, unless whathehell Jul 2015 #77
She could have smuggled it in, it wouldnt be the first time someone has managed to sneak drugs cstanleytech Jul 2015 #124
Do you really see that happening? whathehell Jul 2015 #126
Didn't the report cited on M$NBC also say fredamae Jul 2015 #78
Live body vs deceased body udbcrzy2 Jul 2015 #82
Agree - we need an expert (and hopefully the family obtained top of the line). laserhaas Jul 2015 #88
Independent Medical Examiner udbcrzy2 Jul 2015 #92
Thanks udbcrzy2 laserhaas Jul 2015 #97
Sorry, but cannabis users don't tend to kill themselves. Helen Borg Jul 2015 #85
While I don't agree with the "lots of--" conclusion; I do heartily concur with cannabis uses "don't laserhaas Jul 2015 #98
Is it possible for marijuana to make you that incapacitated? jmowreader Jul 2015 #91
some of the treats & candy can make a person very, very sleepy but no one has died I ever heard of. Sunlei Jul 2015 #122
Sleepy enough to not notice if someone was putting a noose around your neck? jmowreader Jul 2015 #131
sadly, I think after 3 days in jail she was tired,depressed over the 'ruined' life & killed herself. Sunlei Jul 2015 #139
YUP - you can alcohol poison and destroy body functions - even death; but laserhaas Jul 2015 #135

shraby

(21,946 posts)
1. Actually, Fox is not a news source.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:32 AM
Jul 2015

Another thought:
If she had it in her system like that, she must have been fed it, because the other inmates would have smelled it if smoked.

I'll wait for a more credible source of info.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
3. It came from AP - but Fox doesn't (properly) link to the AP story
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:36 AM
Jul 2015

Credible remarks are the ones from "inside" the story - that the amounts are extremely high.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
8. I'd be interested to see if it's
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:38 AM
Jul 2015

11-hydroxy-thc or a non edible form. Either way, this stinks, and not like chiba.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
14. JackInGreen - Please explain, in further detail - to us non-tokers
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:42 AM
Jul 2015

Can edible forms of marijuana cause a person to be so relaxed - that they wouldn't be able to fight a hanging?

Or - for that matter - smoking such heavy amounts?

Can you taste the difference - if put in soup or other foods?

What about drinking such - in liquid form?

 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
48. When it's fight or flight
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:50 AM
Jul 2015

You get straight in a hurry.

A pot high is overridden by adrenalin.

Now about these so called experts.....

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
50. That's my opinion - also. As remarked in my comments below and elsewhere
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:53 AM
Jul 2015

the attempt at asphyxiation would immediately halted - once she started facing the real reality of it all.

Now way she could be SO depressed (even if Texas A&M told her she was going to lose the job) - that she'd go through it.

NO WAY!

And - reality is that (even if she was determined) her body would have instinctively (involuntarily) convulsed, gagged etc.

This is why we need REAL expert analysis.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
113. MOI wants to know if they did DNA swabs of the purported hang noose
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:07 PM
Jul 2015

and other tests (see if a party utilized gloves)

This is a current pic from DailyMail UK - of the jail cell hanging noose

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
12. Its an Associated Press press story unless fox has taken to to posting
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:40 AM
Jul 2015

"Associated Press" above every article on their site.

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
7. Stop hating the source - and LOOK at the dam fact I posted from within the story
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:38 AM
Jul 2015

The message more important than the quote by a national news outlet - of an AP story

is the fact that Fox News is telling the FACT of extremely high levels.

SANDY was POISONED

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
9. The source is a cesspool of propaganda...why should we have to sort through such a source?
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:39 AM
Jul 2015

I get your point about the facts being the facts.....but not from Fox, which often sources AP and then modifies the story to fit their agenda.

And....what difference does it make? Marijuhana is not a catalyst for suicide, but it is for a smear campaign.

And the measurement of micrograms per litre is for urine, not blood:

"Blood Tests

Unlike urine tests, blood tests detect the active presence of THC in the bloodstream. In the case of smoked marijuana, THC peaks rapidly in the first few minutes after inhaling, often to levels above 100 ng/ml in blood plasma. It then declines quickly to single-digit levels within an hour. High THC levels are therefore a good indication that the subject has smoked marijuana recently. THC can remain at low but detectable levels of 1-2 ng/ml for 8 hours or more without any measurable signs of impairment in one-time users. In chronic users, detectable amounts of blood THC can persist for days. In one study of chronic users, residual THC was detected for 24 to 48 hours or longer at levels of 0.5 - 3.2 ng/ml in whole blood (1.0 - 6.4 ng/ml in serum) [Skopp and Potsch].

Note: THC blood levels can be measured in two ways. Most labs used by U.S. law enforcement report levels based on concentration in whole blood, but others report concentration in blood serum or plasma instead. Concentrations in whole blood are about half as high as those in serum/plasma. Therefore 0.5 - 3.2 ng/ml in whole blood = 1.0 - 6.4 ng/ml in plasma or serum. Unless otherwise stated, whole blood concentrations are reported here."

I think the tests were blood test and the levels being confused with urine tests.

Also, Marijuhana for a regular user can be detected in blood for up to 7 days for a regular user, put to 100 in urine.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
32. Fred - THE source is actually AP - Fox is just the ONLY link I can find to the AP story
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:13 AM
Jul 2015

Would gladly change it all - if someone can find me the original AP

when I tried to query AP - it didn't come up (even better story if Fox made up an AP thingy)

Point is - we are turning faux on its head....

they are trying to say she was a heavy drug user

and we are pointing out the REAL issue of their (reported) facts
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
16. Definition of Poison is The Most Apropos - it totally explains how Sandy was murdered
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:44 AM
Jul 2015

poi·son
ˈpoiz(ə n/
noun
1.
a substance that is capable of causing the illness or death of a living organism when introduced or absorbed.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
17. But it didn't....
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:48 AM
Jul 2015

even in large edible doses there are no records or reports, no evidence that anyone, anywhere, has ever been poisoned to death by pot or 'overdosed' in any way without mixing with stronger substances. If the pot was at all responsible for her death, it was as a sedative to allow them to string her up and write it off as 'pot head committed suicide, no loss'. I agree with the first statement, last of your OP, she was doped. I'll insist, poison is the wrong word.
(and really, arguing about it is moot, the supposed levels of THC in her bloodstream have little to nothing to do with her arrest, the racist shitbag that hauled her out of her car, or the institutional racism that this town calls it's heritage)

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
19. NOT poisoned To DEATH - Just enough toxic poisoning to make one IMPAIRED
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:51 AM
Jul 2015

Much easier to hang someone in an induced state (likely getting someone to walk off a ledge) -

than totally sober.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
64. Legally it is poisoning.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:43 AM
Jul 2015

In Colorado, some teen, unbeknownst to his teacher and classmates, gave tbem brownies laced with marijuana. They became woozy, spacey, nauseated and sick from the effects of the MJ and some went to emergency rooms. One of the criminal charges against the teen was poisoning.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
66. Many of us often misconstrue terms and/or coin of phrases.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:48 AM
Jul 2015

My point - all along - (after they said NO signs of struggle)

is that she didn't even struggle with herself.

Facing the knock on heaven's door - the body adrenaline kicks in - and so does panic.

NO F'n way - was Sandy SO severely depressed - that she would face death - quietly....

Response to laserhaas (Reply #7)

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
83. So why derail this thread with an argument over source?
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 01:39 PM
Jul 2015

It does nothing but distract from the OP's point.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
90. Orginally the source came from Fixed News
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 02:58 PM
Jul 2015

The poster has since changed the story from Fixed News to the AP article. I'll delete my comments so people don't get confused.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
93. NO need to do so -
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:12 PM
Jul 2015

Trust me, I'm used to get produce tossed at me.

It was just so very important - to get my belief that she was poisoned/doped - out there.

With someone of consequence breaking the facts of the possibility, into question.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
121. Already did. No worries
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:31 PM
Jul 2015

As to the story you posted I wonder where she got that much weed. She was going to her dream job in Prairie View A&M and I'm sure they drug test there. No way she she became a rastafarian in jail so the story about her being drugged and murdered has merit.

Thanks for the change. Didn't wanna sound like a hardass but I lose my cool when I see a Fixed News story on the Late Breaking page.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
4. Colorado and Washington state have a ridiculously low
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:36 AM
Jul 2015

...legal limit for THC while driving.

Saying someone had "more than three times the legal limit for drivers in Colorado and Washington" isn't saying much.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
11. That's the whole point. Facts and outcome - DON"T ADD UP - U N L E S S... Sandy was
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:39 AM
Jul 2015

POISONED! (doped beyond ability to fight back)

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
84. I see your point, but have to pose this question:
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 01:41 PM
Jul 2015

Why marijuana? It seems like a very ineffective drug to use to incapacitate someone.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
94. If it worked - than the "ineffective" argue is moot.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:15 PM
Jul 2015

And (IMO) this makes all the logical sense in the world (from the poisoning/doping POV)

They needed something they could explain she utilized/consumed.

An easy sell (if it does indeed succeed at doping one to the point of least resistance)

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
13. This marijuana 'issue' is a red herring....
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:41 AM
Jul 2015

To cover for her false arrest and murder in jail.
Pot is not the cause of her death any more than the breakfast she had the day she was kidnapped by a racist power tripping asshole with a badge.

I wouldn't trust any information coming out of Texas right now.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
95. I would argue to the contrary. Weed didn't kill her; but it made her easier to suicide.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:18 PM
Jul 2015

The non 'Red Herring' - is the fact that they suppressed this pot issue, until now.

They knew it was going to be discovered by the independent autopsy's -

so they (appear) to have escaped getting "caught" on the issue - by trying to twist the facts to their benefit.


OOPs!

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
99. No, the pot issue is being used to demonize her.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:24 PM
Jul 2015

It covers for the fact that she should have never been jailed to begin with.
How does pot make it easier to 'suicide' her? Pot can't kill you. And it doesn't incapacitate in the way you seem to think.
Perhaps if you explained your theory......

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
102. Yes... that was Fox News intention; but it is back firing.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:36 PM
Jul 2015

If she has a history of use - the family will know (so should arrest records, if it was that morose of an issue)

IMO this is a Smoking Gun.

They didn't report about this issue (even when one local judge was bad mouthing Sandy on his Twitter page) - until they realized it would come out in the independent autopsy(s).

This issue (if the toxicity levels bare out to be - as reported) raises many more issues than what Fox seeks to quash.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
111. I think her blood test was normal result for average 'user'? the test is to sensitive so authorities
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:59 PM
Jul 2015

can 'bust' people as "impaired druggies", or fire from job, or refuse food stamps, if they smoked a joint last month.

edit to add, the marijuana test is over sensitive also so media like fox and police can use the test to say, see she deserved to die she was impaired on drugs.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
116. Yeah... like weed makes you worse than on LSD -
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:12 PM
Jul 2015

and the first way you desire to get out of jail (even with bail money on the way) - is to hang yourself.

Faux frug sucks.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
119. fox is just an arm of the republican party and Rs dislike about 50% plus of Americans
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:19 PM
Jul 2015

republicans dislike about 100% of what are today called 'immigrants' without papers.

So republican-fox can have their perverted, hateful, TV 'fun' with some people busted by their 'hero police'

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
18. The dashcam-vid was edited and this is the toxicology report of the "defective" autopsy. Go figure.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:50 AM
Jul 2015

My guess:
There is so much evidence-tampering going on that the cops themselves lost track what's real and what's made up. That's why they want one more autopsy.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
20. maybe they gave her some evidence eatables they seized from one of their car traffic stop searches??
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:52 AM
Jul 2015

One 'pot cookie' is enough for any person, 2 cookies and one is very loopie- sedated kindoff, for many hours.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
24. That's the type of facts we need to know 'Sunlei' - Can you put up a GD thread of more details.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:57 AM
Jul 2015

Nobody is listening to the common sense premise I've been proffering - that Sandy HAD to be doped up

in order for them to cause the hanging to transpire - without any signs of defensive wounds.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
27. no I can't my only trip to Colorado, I ate the evidence. sorry.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:03 AM
Jul 2015

I didn't want to 'break the law' and bring anything home from vacation.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
55. I don't 'use' either. I did want to try legal Co. pot.I can report that 2 treats made me so relaxed,
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:08 AM
Jul 2015

I had to have an 8 hour sleep and woke refreshed & unimpaired, to a beautiful day.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
25. one doesn't eat and THC stored in body fat is released into blood & stupid pot test picks up.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:01 AM
Jul 2015

people are not stoned or impaired at all but the 'test' is rigged to pick it up.

The police 'system' to promotes the "OMG, they had evil marijuana madness and that's why they're DEAD and deserve to be abused and DEAD.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
28. Why did she refuse breakfast? == Who disclosed such a (purported) fact?
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:04 AM
Jul 2015

Will the independent investigations - actually do a true - job of investigating?

 

Snotcicles

(9,089 posts)
35. I don't recall who he his source was, he was wondering if her meal the night before
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:14 AM
Jul 2015

might have been tampered with.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
37. Again - that's a REAL possibility.... If she new they were tampering with her food
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:17 AM
Jul 2015

and the effects were being rejected (upsetting her system) - that would explain her saying no to breakfast.

Could also be, from stories that I've heard, jail house food really sucks (Bologna sandwiches, beans, hotdogs and yuck).

Breakfast could have been beans/rice (in TX especially) - and/or Mush (eeewwww)

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
23. or perhaps after 3 full days in jail she was demoralized enough, exausted enough, to want to die.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:56 AM
Jul 2015

They killed her, even if they didn't feed her some- police seized evidence.

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
31. Thats possible but there are possibilities as well and to be fair
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:11 AM
Jul 2015

one of those other possibilities is that maybe her parents decided not to pay the bond to get her out and it stressed her to the breaking point, another possibility is she became worried that the police might find something or had found something in her car in which case the police would be well advised to go over it with a fine tooth comb assuming they still have it.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
36. That's the basis of my upcoming GD thread - what happened, possibilities
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:15 AM
Jul 2015

including the fact that - the reporting of the arrest - might have cost her that new job.

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
39. I recommend reading the posts by Lee-Lee over here
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:22 AM
Jul 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7012134
Its been interesting to read their perspective as well as their reasoning as to why the officers order to put her cigarette out was actually a lawful order.
Its even causing me to sway in my opinion that the officer should be fired.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
40. Not a "lawful order". anyone with eyes and ears and a mild familiarity with the law that saw the video know that...why do you not?
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:33 AM
Jul 2015

How can I make it more clear how wrong you are to champion this desperate RW talking point?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027001748

Response to Fred Sanders (Reply #40)

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
44. The purported leap of logic fails Fred. No one is "championing" the RW... In fact I'm doing the
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:41 AM
Jul 2015

opposite.

Faux wants to paint her as a drug addict - and I'm taking their (reported) facts

and making a much more logical pathway of discussion.

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
45. I'm not championing any talking points, what I am doing is what I am allowed which is to have
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:43 AM
Jul 2015

and form my own opinion and newsflash for you that might not be the same as yours and if you dont like that tough shit.

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
54. "I prefer justice for Sarah Bland" No, I dont think you do.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:01 AM
Jul 2015

I think you are more about causing drama on the forum than anything but hey I could be wrong, in which case I apologize.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
56. Fred and cstanley - Can't we just get along? No need to get up at each other - We are against THEM
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:12 AM
Jul 2015

I appreciate opposing points of view.

But let's take the high road.... Yell at me if you will - I've been enduring that for a decade plus now.

Imparting arguments of what in each other's mind isn't good form (and is not licit in a court of law)

Because no one else can ever know what someone else is "thinking".

My point of this thread - was to get the discussion going - on HOW (IMO no question of "if&quot Sandy was doped to be hung (as my remarks in the 2nd part of the thread {above} details)

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
59. Fair enough.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:21 AM
Jul 2015

Oh and laserhaas, I think that might be an Associated Press press story not a story written by fox news.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
61. Never said it was "written" by Fox
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:28 AM
Jul 2015

I actually note that it is a Fox link to AP

and I'm updating the thread (partiallY) until someone tells me yes or no - on changing it to AP

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
42. I'm amazed that one would think there'd be a need for further review - on the firing issue.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:37 AM
Jul 2015

No matter how you look at it (doctored video or not) - this officer escalated a matter of a "warning" ticket;
and the party in question wound up dead - as a (cause n effect) result.

One party losing his career to send a clear message to all others - to act properly - totally outweighs the needs of the Blue Wall

KT2000

(20,583 posts)
80. the order to put out the cigarette
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 01:18 PM
Jul 2015

appears to me to be an indication that he had the intention of escalating. He was there to hand her the warning ticket. He could have handed it to her and gone back to his car. He chose to egg her on knowing that she was irritated. He wanted the cigarette out of the way for the altercation he was creating.
He should be fired - what he did was against his police training - he escalated.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
89. Concur KT2000 - their job is to keep the peace (mitigate)
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 02:54 PM
Jul 2015

instead he let his anger disturb the peace (instigate)

And (initially) I thought it was just pissy ego (he asked her a question - she answered - and the answer pointed out how much of a dick he was being..... that is when he made the "put out" request and things got out of control).

If his u-Turn had malice of forethought, I can't believe he would have just presented a "warning" ticket.

Think the anger was (un)righteous indignation (spur of the moment)

and - from there - everything went to hell

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
109. Well Lee explained that the courts allow officers alot of leeway when it comes a stop like this and
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:52 PM
Jul 2015

while I agree officer that the officer escalated it I am not 100% sure anymore if they deserve to be fired over it after all its not like a nightstick and just beating on her he just asked her to put out a cigarette.

msrizzo

(796 posts)
127. That's not the only thing he did.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 05:32 PM
Jul 2015

The police already said that there were several things in his actions that violated their protocol. So maybe, the problem wasn't asking her to put out a cigarette so much as attempting to drag her out of the car and then threatening to "light her up" when he wasn't able to do that and then whatever else he did to her when they were out of the the camera frame. She wasn't arrested for refusing to put out a cigarette so I think you're saying that he didn't deserve to be fired over that is kind of moot.

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
129. True enough but that is what got the ball rolling with her refusing to comply with
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 05:51 PM
Jul 2015

a lawful order according to Lee and its causing me atleast to lean tiny bit towards the not firing him area though I am still leaning about 99% towards firing.

KT2000

(20,583 posts)
133. the reason he should be fired
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:37 PM
Jul 2015

is because he is the one who escalated. No matter what the law may say, he violated police policy which makes him unsuitable for the job. The law would control what someone is criminally liable for but employment relies upon other rules as well. He would not be fired for criminal conduct.He would be fired for not following protocol which had disastrous consequences.

I believe there would be no question he would be fired if he did this to a wealthy white person.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
134. Correct. If it was Palin's daughter - they'd want him strung up.
Wed Jul 29, 2015, 12:44 AM
Jul 2015

Must can this guy - to send a clear message (unless you never want to send any clear message)

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
136. I am not sure about 100% anymore either now that I have seen the tape a few more times.
Wed Jul 29, 2015, 01:20 AM
Jul 2015

I was 100% sure before that he should be fired but after seeing the whole tape I cannot support that anymore.
Why? Because its seems he was pretty calm with her until she refused to put the cigarette out and he seemed pretty civil enough when he asked her to do it like anyone else would be when asking someone to put one out.
Granted her arguing over it was a minor issue and he could have chosen to overlook it but legally? If Lee is right the officer will probably be in the clear because if I understand it correctly now no matter what the alleged provocation is arguing with a police isnt permitted under the law in most states.
Now he might get in trouble for causing the bruise on her back when he arresting her but I kinda doubt he will get in alot of trouble for that since he could claim she resisted arrest which considering the audio on the tape I kinda think she did and struggling with a officer when he is arresting you just seems like a bad choice that will end up with you facing even more charges.
All that aside though that doesnt mean the police department is off the hook for her death because if they knew she had attempted suicide they are probably going to be found negligent for putting her in a cell alone, unmonitored and with a trash bag in a can.

KT2000

(20,583 posts)
137. it was before he told her
Wed Jul 29, 2015, 02:05 AM
Jul 2015

to put the cigarette out. It was when he said she sounded upset (forgot his exact word) and then after she explained, he said, "Are you through?" At that point he was escalating. It was also then he was preparing for an altercation by telling her to put the cigarette out.
Police training is all about "escalation" and how to prevent it. He did not do that.

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
138. Well I am not disagreeing with you because yes he probably could have
Wed Jul 29, 2015, 02:24 AM
Jul 2015

have done a better job in hindsight but we cannot change the past all we can do is try and learn and not repeat the mistakes we make in life.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
103. new job was toast. She had a serious Felony charge. First thing in jail is strip Naked for ? to see
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:40 PM
Jul 2015
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
105. That's one thing that is most disturbing. There's be no PR from the institution
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:43 PM
Jul 2015

where she was going to work.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
62. WOW - if that be true NOLALady - there'd be almost no logical reason for the suicide
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:37 AM
Jul 2015

It would actually point a larger finger to murder - if they knew she was about to get out.

Do you have a link to that quote?

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
96. SOmeone in the comments here - said her sister had committed to doing so.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:19 PM
Jul 2015

We have to wait for the family to make statements of fact.

n8dogg83

(248 posts)
101. Also keep in mind that she had epilepsy and was taking medication for it
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:35 PM
Jul 2015

up until she got arrested. Thom Hartmann on his show a few days ago mentioned that the list of side effects on the specific drug she was taking (can't remember the name) included thoughts of suicide for those who suddenlty stop taking the drug. Now i dont know about you, but i sincerely doubt they would have allowed her to continue to take the medication she may have had with her. So its likely she went 3 days without medication, including the possibility of her being heavily drugged with marijuana (which can cause alot of paranoia), something smells very fishy to me.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
38. That's what's needed. An outside investigation with no one from Texas
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:22 AM
Jul 2015

involved in the investigation.
All the "answers" from the investigation so far raised more questions than they answered.

I'd like to know how she could have "hung" herself. She would have needed a way to get her feet/body clear of the floor. How did she accomplish that?

The amount of mj in her system needs an explanation as she was in there for more than a day.

Were there ligation marks on her neck? Spots on her eyes from strangulation or lack of oxygen? Nothing was mention of any marks or spots.

These questions are just off the top of my head, I'm sure I could think of more with a report in front of me.

Just thought of other questions.
What were the contents of her stomach? That's part of an autopsy.
What was under her fingernails? That's part of an autopsy.

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
41. "She would have needed a way to get her feet/body clear of the floor. How did she accomplish that?"
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:37 AM
Jul 2015

Actually no her feet could be on the floor as she could have hung herself simply by wrapping one end of the plastic bag around the upper bunk rail and the other around her neck and if she wrapped it properly all she had to do then was allow her body weight to do the rest.
Assuming she did it right it could cut off the flow of blood in her carotid arteries in which case she would have been out like a light in a few seconds

https://writersforensicsblog.wordpress.com/2011/07/09/q-and-a-how-long-does-it-take-for-someone-to-die-from-carotid-artery-compression/

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
46. So - this (scientifically) points to the key question(s)
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:45 AM
Jul 2015

My 1st opine was - someone dying of "asphyxiation" - would have a convulsion reflex and make very loud noises.

Therefore, I need to know exactly how such should transpire. Your link purports a KEY item - that;

These numbers would also mostly hold true if both carotids were suddenly pressed shut—not easy to do

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
49. Not easy but also not impossible it just depends on how she did it.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:53 AM
Jul 2015

Photos in this case would have been helpful but I am betting photos were probably the last thing on their minds as they probably panicked and thought "Oh shit we screwed up" and tried to get her down asap to try and revive her.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
51. My bet is just the opposite.. There was no attempt at reviving.. NONE
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:55 AM
Jul 2015

even (IF) they didn't do it - they were glad she was dying/dead - and the lawsuit would never materialize.

OOPs!

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
57. You are forgetting something, remember the sheriff saying they had documents where she admitted to
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:16 AM
Jul 2015

trying to commit suicide before? Well now those documents will come back to haunt them probably in a negligence lawsuit by her parents and thats probably going to be bigger than any lawsuit she might have had herself because her own actions on the dashcam would have made it difficult for her to win ultimately in court imo.
Her parents though dont have to present the dashcam and can maybe get excluded from being shown or presented as evidence at all because it probably wouldnt be relevant to the police departments negligence. All the parents lawyers probably have to prove is that the department knew she had stated she had made past attempts before and that the department was negligent by not monitoring her and leaving something like a trash bag in her cell from which to hang herself.
So no, I dont see them getting away from a lawsuit.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
58. That's why moi ended with "OOPs"
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:20 AM
Jul 2015

The possible plan to assure no lawsuit - possibly assured there would be one.

I've already pointed out (in other threads) that "IF" they're claim on your remarks of attempted suicide are true (there are conflicting reports - already noted) - then the authorities are most certainly to blame, for not putting her on "watch" protocols.

Lars39

(26,109 posts)
69. Her right arm was injured in the arrest, could she do all that one-armed?
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:02 PM
Jul 2015

And was her injured arm her dominant arm?

Questions that need answers...

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
71. Correct Lars39 - Many - M A N Y, questions that need answering
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:20 PM
Jul 2015

This MJ thingy posses more issues than it (tries) to quash

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
75. A most recent injured arm (if that be the case) would be excruciating
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:49 PM
Jul 2015

I think that is the least likely though. She would have told her family and friend, if she were in pain.

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
72. Just because someone might have only one arm does not mean a cripple who cannot do anything
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:29 PM
Jul 2015

and as far I can tell she had two of them even though one might be hurting her a bit.
And yes I am speaking experience as I suffer from a winged shoulder on my right side which causes me intense pain most of the time from my wrist all the way up the arm and around to the area between the shoulders and yet I still manage to do day to day chores.

Lars39

(26,109 posts)
73. Doesn't mean she could. A lot of people aren't able to much of anything with non-dominant arm, hand.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:39 PM
Jul 2015

Or at least not without quite a bit of practice.

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
74. It doesnt mean she couldnt either.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:47 PM
Jul 2015

Unless it was broken but even then all it would do is slow her down a bit, if they had been monitoring her though they could have stopped her easily.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
108. what if they 'made her stand' next that metal pole somehow & tied a lg trash bag around her neck to
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:49 PM
Jul 2015

keep her head secure without leaving marks around her neck. and then she fainted or had a seizure? hands back handcuffed to pole.

I wouldn't put it past some prison police to have 'punishments' for cell prisoners they disliked for some reason.

the police cell evidence photo showed the trashbag in the can!! what trashbag did she "hang herself with"???

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
112. Thats something they should investigate of course to rule it out
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:06 PM
Jul 2015

even though there were no signs of a struggle by the medical examiner nor has there been any other evidence as of yet that indicates foul play.
I know they didn't have cameras in the cell she was in but I assume they probably do have a number of them scattered around the jail itself and with them they should be able to do a rough tracking of where the varies officers were around that time to determine if your theory is plausible or not.
As for the trash bag sometimes businesses in the grocery industry will they double line them (overlapping bags one inside another) to make it easier they have to empty once and not have to replace the bag right away so that could be why but a better question is why didnt put someone who admitted to trying suicide under observation? That smacks of negligence imo.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
114. All good questions - especially when you see the noose
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:09 PM
Jul 2015


Provided by DailyMail UK - of a local ABC station in Texas

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
117. Well they should test the bags to see if plausible
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:16 PM
Jul 2015

to be used in that manner but it depend on two things.
#1 The strength of the plastic that the bags are made of.
#2 The manner in which its been constructed.
I mean hell you can even make rope with plastic bags
http://www.instructables.com/id/very-strong-shopping-bag-rope-no-tools-needed/

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
115. whos the 'they' to investigate? They already stated the last check was against policy, the lazy pol
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:12 PM
Jul 2015

desk police used the intercom to check on her.

I still think police did something to her, many some things over those 3 days of hell and even if she suicided herself, they drove her to it!

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
118. FBI and the DOJ are the two main federal agencies who would probable be looking into that
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:18 PM
Jul 2015

and the state could appoint someone to investigate.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
120. Think that cell is protected by fbi and doj right now as a crime scene? It will take them years.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:25 PM
Jul 2015

and trust police to have changed nothing in that cell they took the 'evidence photo' of several days ago?
the trash bag in the police photo was still in the can

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
123. No, a trashbag was on the can atleast in photos not in it or atleast
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:53 PM
Jul 2015

thats what it looks like to me.
It doesnt mean they are lying either if they were double lining the cans like I have seen some places do so they just have to pull the one bag out and not replace it right away but like I pointed out in another post the better question is why did they even leave a person with an alleged past suicide attempt alone in a cell with anything that could be used to kill themselves like in this case a trashbag? Its negligent.

msrizzo

(796 posts)
128. Speculation is futile but...
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 05:37 PM
Jul 2015

...if they were double lining the cans, why not use all the trash bags in the can to make a stronger noose, if she really wanted to kill herself?

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
104. I'm researching the original PR's for my GD thread.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:42 PM
Jul 2015

It seems (as pathologicals always do) that the story - keeps changing

drm604

(16,230 posts)
52. Here's the AP article.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:57 AM
Jul 2015
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/9287eef889d94385bca932a79e247e2c/experts-report-shows-sandra-bland-may-have-used-pot-jail

As far as I can tell, it's the exact same article as on Fox. I don't like Fox, but they were just running the article straight from the AP, and it's labeled as such on their site. Everyone should stop jumping all over laserhaas about this.
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
53. Is it proper protocol for me to edit the posting and link to AP (instead)?
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:00 AM
Jul 2015

Not sure about that sort of thingy...

drm604

(16,230 posts)
86. I don't make the rules around here, but I don't see why not.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 02:04 PM
Jul 2015

You'd still be linking to the same article. Maybe you could add a note that you changed the link to point to AP rather than Fox but that it's the same article.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
87. Well... I did the switch --- and we'll see if anyone alerts me of a protocol controlling
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 02:48 PM
Jul 2015

Thanks

ellennelle

(614 posts)
63. could not agree more here
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:41 AM
Jul 2015

to consolidate most if not all the good points raised:

it she did consume that much, how the hell did that happen IN the jail, exactly?

we assume she was searched and nothing was found; if it had been, they would have also charged her with possession.

therefore, we can only assume it was 'given' to her. given (ahem) she was in her cell alone, the only source would have been staff or official.

or food. most likely this form, because of course, the smell would have been detected by other inmates. and, i suppose we should suppose, by staff and officials. at which point she would have been additionally charged.

so far, all these data points are ones supplied by the 'official story', strung together by, erm, logic.

therefore, the only conclusion that can be drawn here is that she was drugged. and three times the legal limit might be enough to knock her into a deep enough sleep to slip a garbage bag around her head.

motive? as has been noted here before, the five minutes the cop took to check out her plate was plenty to discover her 'sandra speaks' and black lives matter background.

the last thing these folks wanted in this gawdforsaken racist hellhole was an outside infiltrator troublemaker, from obama's chicago no less!

WHERE IS THE DAMN DOJ???

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
65. Nice to see ya again 'ellennelle' - As always - Spot On!
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:45 AM
Jul 2015

True analysis of these (newly developing - not ever known heretofore - purported) FACTs

No mention in the original "suicide" release that she was "drugged" induced to make the hanging tolerable.

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
70. That's the Faux not-news point of contention; but we're turning that on its head.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:19 PM
Jul 2015

The issue is that this new development smacks of B.S. (like everything else in this case)

and (IMO) gives more reason to be suspicious of the authorities and look for independent reviews.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
77. Sandra was alone in her cell..I can't understand how she would have acquired MJ in that jail, unless
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 01:03 PM
Jul 2015

it was deliberately put in her food.

I strongly doubt she would have accepted a doobie (if it would even be offered) by the shit heads at the jail.

I hope they get to the bottom of this awful, tragic incident.

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
124. She could have smuggled it in, it wouldnt be the first time someone has managed to sneak drugs
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:59 PM
Jul 2015

into a jail but the other option is she had been alot of it before the arrest as the report said and it might have explained her behavior towards the officer.
No I am not saying that it excuses the officer who arrested her because it does not as hes supposed to be a professional but it could mitigate some of it enough that maybe he should not be fired, only saying maybe because I am still leaning 99% towards firing.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
126. Do you really see that happening?
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 05:32 PM
Jul 2015

She was shocked at being arrested in the first place -- I doubt she'd want to smoke pot in a place like that,

but I could be wrong.

BTW, I don't think her "behavior" toward the cop was anything special -- If he'd followed protocol, he would

have simply given her a ticket and let her drive on. Instead, he deliberately provoked her with a stupid

question concerning her "irritation" and got pissed off when she answered honestly and calmly. Then he

tried to "push it" further with another petty orders about her cigarette which she had every right to smoke,

and then demanded -- quite outside of 'protocol' -- that she leave her car, threatening to "light her up".

if she didn't.

This was a racist, sexist asshole looking for trouble.

That this young woman on her way to a job should be jailed and then found DEAD three days after

being stopped for a goddamn TRAFFIC Ticket is an outrage.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
78. Didn't the report cited on M$NBC also say
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 01:10 PM
Jul 2015

that she had used cannabis at least 5 hours before her death? Well, I am Speculating that she may have been unwittingly administered a High Dose of cannabis in her food-without knowledge and consent.
Her phone calls - her vocal clarity does not suggest intoxication by Any means.

5 Hours the main effects have plateaued and begun to subside.
https://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabis/cannabis_effects.shtml

I also would want to review any drug test results she had through her New employer. Where the Hell is Sandra's Phone?
I'm not buying the Cannabis angle At all! No way in Hell. And Even IF true...that Does NOT explain nor excuse her Arrest nor does it justify a $5000.00 Bail, nor Three days incarcerated ending in her death. I call bs.

And why did they not discover it while she was Still in custody of the county medical examiner?
It is suspicious for them to all of a sudden want to re autopsy, specific to this so long after the fact. It almost seems like they were alerted by another party and the examiner didn't previously check for drugs for lack of reason/suspicion.
Yep, I don't trust any of them.

 

udbcrzy2

(891 posts)
82. Live body vs deceased body
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 01:35 PM
Jul 2015

I think there is something to consider when you compare the 'legal limits' in a live body as comparing it to someone who is deceased. I know that alcohol levels increase in the deceased as they are decomposing. I don't know what happens with THC levels though in a body that is deceased and decomposing. An independent autopsy (which her family has had done) will maybe tell us more.

I haven't seen anything where the family has released their autopsy and they have every right not to if they wish.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
88. Agree - we need an expert (and hopefully the family obtained top of the line).
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 02:50 PM
Jul 2015

Also concur, it is their prerogative, on whether or not, to release the findings (evidence for litigation).

Just hope an A-Class job was done;

but they can always unearth, if a 2nd opinion by a Dr. Baden type is required.

 

udbcrzy2

(891 posts)
92. Independent Medical Examiner
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:12 PM
Jul 2015

I don't know who they got. Baden might be a good choice as long as he is doing the full examine and not just assisting as was done in the Mike Brown case where a 'coroner' performed that independent autopsy.
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/private-autopsy-says-brown-shot-times-holder-orders-third-autopsy/article_e27c90b4-8fc9-5118-8f4b-ae98a9d0f552.html

You see, Shawn Parcells isn't qualified to do an autopsy according to the National Association of Medical Examiners.
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/missouri-coroners-question-practices-of-forensics-company-operator/article_0662e5b1-dcfa-578f-9487-8ab6a176ea4d.html

I think they made a good choice with their attorney and I'm sure he has some good resources.
http://www.getthecannon.com/

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
97. Thanks udbcrzy2
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:21 PM
Jul 2015

This thing, like Trayvon and others - isn't going to go away, easily.

We need experts concurring on the conclusions, based on facts indisputable.

Helen Borg

(3,963 posts)
85. Sorry, but cannabis users don't tend to kill themselves.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 01:45 PM
Jul 2015

If that was the case, lots of cancer patients who use cannabis would kill themselves. But they don't.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
98. While I don't agree with the "lots of--" conclusion; I do heartily concur with cannabis uses "don't
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:23 PM
Jul 2015

None of this makes sense.... including this "belated" revelation that Sandy was full of weed, high beyond the norms.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
122. some of the treats & candy can make a person very, very sleepy but no one has died I ever heard of.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:31 PM
Jul 2015

Maybe police had evidence taken from crimes that was marijuana in eatable form. And they gave her a couple to eat.

I don't think marijuana in her system had anything to do with her death. Those tests can show marijuana use from months ago.

jmowreader

(50,560 posts)
131. Sleepy enough to not notice if someone was putting a noose around your neck?
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 06:47 PM
Jul 2015

Those tests CAN show marijuana use from months ago, but she wouldn't have had the concentration they are reporting if it was months-ago use.

Thinking out loud...if I were a cop who wanted to suicide someone, I think I would give my victim a cocktail of a high dose of THC plus a lower, but effective, dose of a short-half-life benzodiazepine...the benzodiazepine to sedate her enough to string her up, and the THC because you know they're going to test for it first and if they find a shitload of it that's where they'll stop.

FWIW I don't think pot was the cause either - "heightened desire to kill yourself" isn't one of its known side effects.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
139. sadly, I think after 3 days in jail she was tired,depressed over the 'ruined' life & killed herself.
Wed Jul 29, 2015, 08:07 AM
Jul 2015

In a new town, to start a new job, not enough cash to pay bail bond & a serious Felony to face. People can hang themselves from a doorknob. police are responsible for those under their 'care'

I wish the groups like Black Lives Matter, could set-up a central phone number under a Lawyers name, where persons jailed could call and leave their name & the location where they are jailed. Info could be posted on a message board. Many people go to jail and have no one to call. They disappear into the system and are forgotten.

I am not sure, when people make calls from jail they may not be able to call anyone except family, lawyer, bail bond place.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
135. YUP - you can alcohol poison and destroy body functions - even death; but
Wed Jul 29, 2015, 12:46 AM
Jul 2015

never heard of grass doing such

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Experts: Report shows San...