Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 02:45 PM Jul 2015

Citizens United loses New York ruling over donors

Source: Reuters

A federal judge on Monday rejected Citizens United’s effort to block New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman from demanding that the conservative group disclose more information about its major donors.

U.S. District Judge Sidney Stein in Manhattan refused to impose a preliminary injunction that would stop Schneiderman from requiring charities to disclose names, addresses and total contributions of big donors in order to solicit funds in the state.

Citizens United argued that Schneiderman’s interpretation of a 2006 state regulation on donor disclosures violated its First Amendment free speech and association rights, and invaded the privacy of donors who wished to remain anonymous.

But the judge said Schneiderman’s policy was substantially related to the important government interests of enforcing charitable solicitation laws, and protecting residents from illegitimate charities.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/2015/07/citizens-united-loses-new-york-ruling-over-donors/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Citizens United loses New York ruling over donors (Original Post) DonViejo Jul 2015 OP
Maybe the beginning of the end one ruling at a time. Historic NY Jul 2015 #1
If it works, good. closeupready Jul 2015 #2
So govt's interest in protecting vs illegitimate charities trumps free speech/association JudyM Jul 2015 #3
Is this one way of beating back the influence of "Citizens United" before we get the Constitutional KoKo Jul 2015 #4
 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
2. If it works, good.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 03:18 PM
Jul 2015

Justice delayed is justice denied; nonetheless, I'd like to get there (an end to the Citizens United ruling), and I don't really care that much how.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
3. So govt's interest in protecting vs illegitimate charities trumps free speech/association
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 04:11 PM
Jul 2015

Interesting limitation on the scope of Citizens United's own prior win. Better than nothing.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
4. Is this one way of beating back the influence of "Citizens United" before we get the Constitutional
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:19 PM
Jul 2015

Amendment to get rid of them?

Could we press our states to do what NY's Schneiderman seems to be trying to do?

I'd read that Obama could have gotten the IRS after them because they have legal authority...but, when the woman at IRS was called out and had to resign because she "supposedly targeted RW Groups" that the avenue for IRS to go after Koch's and others was closed down.

I always thought that was a bogus thing. Like shutting down ACORN just after Obama was inaugurated.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Citizens United loses New...