Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 06:24 AM Jun 2015

Threatened salmon die after utility temporarily shuts canal

Source: Associated Press

Threatened salmon die after utility temporarily shuts canal
By ELLEN KNICKMEYER, Associated Press | June 19, 2015 | Updated: June 19, 2015 7:51pm

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — More than one-tenth of the largest wild population of threatened salmon in the Central Valley died after repair work near a power plant led Pacific Gas & Electric Co. to cut off a cooling flow of water into a creek, wildlife and utility officials said Friday.

PG&E, the state's largest utility, restored the water flow on Wednesday to a remote stretch of Butte Creek, home to the largest of three surviving wild populations of Central Valley spring-run Chinook salmon.

The death of 277 of the fewer than 2,000 adult chinook in the creek underscored the vulnerability of one of California's most iconic species in a drought year marked by record low amounts of cooling snow melt.

Salmon populations from Monterey on the central coast to the Oregon border are showing problems related to low, warm water conditions created by the driest four years in state history.


Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/science/article/Threatened-salmon-die-when-utility-temporarily-6338079.php?cmpid=rrhoustontx

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Threatened salmon die after utility temporarily shuts canal (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jun 2015 OP
kick, kick, kick.... daleanime Jun 2015 #1
Irresponsible bastards. They couldn't find a way to mitigate this? peacebird Jun 2015 #2
More suckage. Enthusiast Jun 2015 #3
Unbelievable. madamvlb Jun 2015 #4
Oh this is just peachy. calikid Jun 2015 #5
this is corporate "responsibility" at its best.. TimeToEvolve Jun 2015 #6
I emailed them oldandhappy Jun 2015 #7
I guess PG&E is branching out from blowing up neighborhoods. LeftyMom Jun 2015 #8
The better was the enemy of the merely tolerable, it seems. Igel Jun 2015 #9
It's too bad that the idea of trucking in ice hasn't been invented yet The Second Stone Jun 2015 #10

calikid

(584 posts)
5. Oh this is just peachy.
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 08:55 AM
Jun 2015

I spent many a sunny summer afternoon lounging in some of Butte Creeks pools while going to school at Chico State. The creek terminates about thirty minutes from my home and had recently been the spot of a major chemical dump by meth cookers.

TimeToEvolve

(303 posts)
6. this is corporate "responsibility" at its best..
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 09:22 AM
Jun 2015

mistakes have been made and nobody will be held responsible..

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
8. I guess PG&E is branching out from blowing up neighborhoods.
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 10:58 AM
Jun 2015

Good for them, it's important to pick up new skills.

Igel

(35,317 posts)
9. The better was the enemy of the merely tolerable, it seems.
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 01:27 PM
Jun 2015

Some people didn't read the article, me thinks. The snip from the article easily leaves one with the impression that the salmon weren't really considered in any of this. My initial assumption is that the repair work was done because the power plant needed it and the fish were an irrelevancy, not that the canal's very reason for existing was to ensure a "cooling flow of water into a creek" for the salmon. Excuse me, my bias was showing.

The cooling canal functioned to keep the water in the creek cool for the salmon and was leaking. It would do an inadequate job of cooling the water. The water was going to be too warm and would kill some salmon; a warmer-water pathogen would make things worse. So some salmon would die. I'm sure they'll argue over how many fish would have died: A shorter time period with higher temperatures that killed a lot of fish quickly, or lower but still too-high temperatures that would kill fewer fish per day but last longer.

The rush to repair the canal triggered by an imminent warm spell. What happened may have resulted from thinking was that the repair would save more fish than it caused to die; perhaps the repair work took longer than expected; perhaps somebody was so concerned with the regulatory hassle that might ensue when the lack of a functioning canal killed fish to stop and think that closing the canal might kill fish and create a larger regulatory hassle. Maybe what happened will create less of a hassle anyway: A good faith effort might be seen as less culpable than neglect.

It's one of those, "Just don't sit there, do something" kinds of things we run into. Fight or flight. The alternative is, "Just don't do something, sit there." Which, sadly, is often the correct response.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
10. It's too bad that the idea of trucking in ice hasn't been invented yet
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 01:46 PM
Jun 2015

because if someone had bothered, Chinook would not have lost a tenth of their entire population in few hours.

Oh, wait, trucking in ice was possible. It just wasn't done. PG&E was just saving money for commercials on TV that remind us that they want us to forget that they blow up neighborhoods by being too cheap to maintain their gas lines. At least some execs got bonuses back in the day for putting off that maintenance.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Threatened salmon die aft...