Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 09:35 PM Jun 2015

Minnesota sex offender commitment program ruled unconstitutional

Source: Yahoo! News / Reuters

MINNEAPOLIS (Reuters) - A federal judge on Wednesday ruled Minnesota's sex offender treatment program unconstitutional and ordered a hearing into the system that has not unconditionally released anyone in 20 years and holds more than 700 people in treatment facilities.

U.S. District Judge Donovan Frank did not order anyone immediately released, but urged the governor, state legislative leaders and others to attend a pre-hearing conference in August to discuss changes to protect public safety and ensure people's rights.

"The overwhelming evidence at trial established that Minnesota's civil commitment scheme is a punitive system that segregates and indefinitely detains a class of potentially dangerous individuals without the safe guards of the criminal justice system," Frank wrote in his decision.

Under civil commitments, offenders who have served their prison terms are held in state facilities until completing their treatment.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/minnesota-sex-offender-commitment-program-ruled-unconstitutional-220309613.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Minnesota sex offender commitment program ruled unconstitutional (Original Post) Little Tich Jun 2015 OP
So will this end up costing the state money as well for violating their constitutional rights? cstanleytech Jun 2015 #1
Kinda crazy but if the state is negligent then it will have to pay up yeoman6987 Jun 2015 #2
Quite a few states have similar laws davidpdx Jun 2015 #3

cstanleytech

(26,299 posts)
1. So will this end up costing the state money as well for violating their constitutional rights?
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 09:45 PM
Jun 2015

Cause if the answer is yes then that might very well sting since your looking at potentially 700+ people who had their constitutional rights violated.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
2. Kinda crazy but if the state is negligent then it will have to pay up
Thu Jun 18, 2015, 03:31 AM
Jun 2015

Of all states Minnesota can afford it. So it won't hurt anyone in the state.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
3. Quite a few states have similar laws
Thu Jun 18, 2015, 10:18 AM
Jun 2015
Twenty states (Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin) and the District of Columbia have enacted laws permitting the civil commitment of sexual offenders


I think Oregon used to have it if I remember correctly as well, but the law must have been changed.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Minnesota sex offender co...