Scott Walker Calls For Constitutional Amendment To Make Same-Sex Marriage Bans Constitutional
Source: The New Civil Rights Movement
by David Badash
April 29, 2015 2:47 PM
Scott Walker Calls For Constitutional Amendment To Make Same-Sex Marriage Bans Constitutional
Likely GOP presidential candidate Scott Walker is calling for a constitutional amendment making same-sex marriage bans constitutional, should the Supreme Court strike them down.
For a while, it looked like Scott Walker might be (one of) the first Republican presidential candidates to support same-sex marriage. The Wisconsin governor, who routinely offers ambiguous answers, over the past year has allowed many to infer he might not oppose extending the institution of marriage to same-sex couples. Walker's most-recent example of allowing voters to infer his actual positions and beliefs was his unique comment that he had not attended a same-sex wedding (no response if he would) but he had attended the reception for a same-sex wedding.
One reason some believed in Walker's possible support is that he has a cousin who is gay, and his son was a witness at her wedding. And another was public opinion. The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported last October, "polls have shown more support for same-sex marriage," and added that Walker "has repeatedly answered questions about the ban by saying his opinion doesn't matter because a governor can't change the constitution."
Apparently, Gov. Walker can't change the Wisconsin constitution, but he thinks trying to change the U.S. Constitution is fair game.
If the Supreme Court grants same-sex couples the constitutional right to marry and prohibits states from banning that right, the 47-year old union-busting Tea Party Republican governor says he would support a federal constitutional amendment allowing states to ban same-sex couples from marrying......
Read more: http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/davidbadash/scott_walker_calls_for_constitutional_amendment_to_make_same_sex_marriage_bans_constitutional
Walker is as sleazy as they come.
Also see what what he says about abortion and contraception. He Dodges the question on Women's rights
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Squatty Wanker is a quivering blob of santorum.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Though I wish I hadn't thought of that image
unionthug777
(740 posts)I am forever psychologically scarred from your post.
I prefer to call him a wretched pool of oily anal discharge. which is, for me, being nice.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Does the RW ever listen and hear what is going on around them or do they just listen to FOX and Rush. I wonder if we could get a Constitutional amendment against people like Scott Walker.
Yes, if they can get this crap going then it will be contraception, abortion and other issues they want to cram down our throats. Yes, we need to take our country back.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,765 posts)Hypocrite.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)Please let people open their eyes and see the crook for what he is, an enemy of the people.
murielm99
(30,774 posts)what to say. He can't stick with any position until they do that.
Initech
(100,107 posts)Thespian2
(2,741 posts)a KOCH-sucker, who never held a job outside of politics...after quitting his university...
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Deprive us from living our lives to the fullest, then the state should pay us to move to a safe state if we want too.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)msongs
(67,459 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)murielm99
(30,774 posts)putting that face on here.
riversedge
(70,333 posts)sakabatou
(42,180 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)old guy
(3,284 posts)CatholicEdHead
(9,740 posts)There is no chance for a federal constitutional amendment to pass under the current conditions. There are not 2/3rds of votes in both the House and Senate much less 3/4 of states.
roamer65
(36,747 posts)Nor do you have 2/3 of each house of Congress.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)The purpose is not to effect an actual change in the Constitution. The purpose is to posture to the base.
He'll talk about this during the primaries. Then, if he wins the nomination, for purposes of the general-election campaign he'll suddenly discover that the President neither signs nor vetoes amendments. On that basis he'll deflect questions about it, and even imply that the questioner is trying to divert attention from the real issues.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)will say anything to the nutties...they don't know any better...dumbasses....seriously, do they really think they can win nationally with this BS....
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)Perhaps it is a better idea if Walker runs for leadership of the Taliban as he seems to holds similar fundamentalist beliefs.
I would feel compansion for suffering Wisconsinites, had they not re-elected the Koch puppet in the re-call election.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,159 posts)in an effort to seduce ignorant base
dembotoz
(16,856 posts)ut oh
(899 posts)Let's enshrine bigotry in the constitution.....
Then next we can work on restarting slavery... we're almost there in some ways anyway...
Myrina
(12,296 posts).... are they just angling for loony votes, or are they phobes too?