France's lower house bans ultra-thin models
Source: Deutsche Welle
French lawmakers have approved a new measure that takes aim at anorexic models on the catwalk. Israel and Spain already have bans targeting the fashion industry's penchant for excessively thin women.
On Friday, France's National Assembly, the lower house of parliament, voted in favor of a fine of up to 75,000 euros ($85,000) and up to six months' imprisonment for anyone who employs ultra-thin models.
"Anyone whose body mass index
is below a certain level will not be able to work as a catwalk model," the measure read.
Models must present a medical certificate proving that they have a BMI of at least 18. A woman with a height of 1.75 meters (5.7 feet) who weighed 55 kg (121 lb) would be considered at the extreme lower end of this new scale.
Read more: http://www.dw.de/frances-lower-house-bans-ultra-thin-models/a-18360239
In the land of 'haute couture', they're finally getting real. Healthy women in the real world don't look like that! And who wants to?
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 4, 2020, 11:34 AM - Edit history (2)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x5620791Below 18.5 is considered underweight in America, so while I think the BMI is reasonable, imprisonment is ridiculous. Just pump the fines into six-figure territory and ban any repeat offenders from the business.
rocktivity
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)the law had to conform to a certain legal form--'pour la forme' as they say. More of a deterrent than anything.
Nobody's going to do hard time for hiring a skinny nymphette.
valerief
(53,235 posts)very rich.
TygrBright
(20,763 posts)I'm not sure exactly what kind of sick fixation it represented initially, but since the early 20th century, the fashion industry has been pretty much dominated by designers who obviously find ordinary adult female morphology repulsive.
This would have gotten them nowhere had there not been a burgeoning advertising industry that realized the profits to be made in convincing women they look unattractive unless they spend buttloads of cash on realizing an unattainable ideal.
disgustedly,
Bright
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)It's always about the money, and no abuse is too great if they can profit off of it.
A bit about why they are so thin here:
http://paleoforwomen.com/two-shocking-dehumanizing-reasons-runway-models-are-so-thin-and-why-we-should-never-aspire-to-look-like-them/
And also, this gives a bit of an overview of the history of thin models, albeit without explaining why so much:
http://onthisdayinfashion.com/?p=10323
A step forwards, here, and I just wish it would be reflected on a wider scale.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)feminist activists just said 'çà suffit'!
christx30
(6,241 posts)was holding her mom's fashion magazine a new months ago and said that she thought the model was beautiful. So I got on my phone and showed her a youtube video about hours and hours of work it takes to get that woman to look that attractive. Make-up, hair, lighting, Photoshop. I was using the video to show how unrealistic that level of beauty is. I told her she is the prettiest person I've ever met, but that's not as important as the fact that she's also the kindest, smartest person I've ever met. Then we looked at space videos and rocket lauches ("See how cool that is? You could be doing stuff like that!" , which she got a kick out of. I think it had an impact on her.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)of the elegant and svelte is BIG BUSINESS.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)Tall, skinny models are probably easy to design for.
Throw in some curves and breasts and many designers are out of their league.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)We tend to pay attention to the people and think that designers are pushing a model of physical beauty onto us, but that's actually not the case. Designers and photographers generally don't care about the models at all. They are pushing the CLOTHES they are wearing. The models body is supposed to be as thin, and as uninteresting as possible so that it doesn't take away from the appearance of the clothing, or introduce any unexpected curves or wrinkles, or require different sizes to fit different people. They want humans whose bodies are uniform and interchangeable, so that any item of clothing can be fit onto any model with a minimum of alteration or tweaking.
The designers want the models to be walking mannequins, not actual PEOPLE, because from their perspective, the human beings are the least important things on that stage or in front of that camera.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)(Should the Zombieapocolypse occur, that 'model' might find herself on the wrong side of mistaken identity!)
Ad agencies need to understand that their bottom line is not a good one when it promotes disorders and diseases. I also applaud France's decision.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)But as a workplace safety issue I am fine with this. Kinda like jockeys have to be monitored.
A bit like the photoshop people and seamstress full employment act.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)encouraging young influenceable tweens to try to look like that.
See here:
'Anorexie: "Je mangeais juste une pomme par jour", témoigne l'ex-mannequin Victoire Dauxerre'
(Anorexia: 'I ate just one apple a day, says ex-model Victoire Dauxerre')
http://www.bfmtv.com/societe/anorexie-je-mangeais-juste-une-pomme-par-jour-temoigne-l-ex-mannequin-victoire-dauxerre-874289.html
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Nobody's going to do hard time for hiring a 'Twiggy'. But, this will keep them off the catwalks and out of the fashion mags.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)This is a measure specifically aimed at an industry that exploits young women and poses a clear and present health risk to same.
Snow Leopard
(348 posts)Seems a little totalitarian for my tastes. Can you imagine if they tried to ban overweight models?
Calista241
(5,586 posts)While their hearts may be in the right place, mandating conformity by law seems a little backwards to me.
Yupster
(14,308 posts)It's unhealthy to be overweight so you can't be hired if you're overweight.
A agree. Too authoritarian for my tastes.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Of all the nonsense posted in this thread, yours is the most offensive.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Larry Engels
(387 posts)Let's get some full-figured women on those runways.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Personally, I'd rather see slim but healthy young women, than these skeletal specters.
ailsagirl
(22,899 posts)ailsagirl
(22,899 posts)They look like beautified Dachau victims. It's a horrifying sight. I've seen photos of former models who are afflicted with anorexia, but now they parade around on the runway when they look as though they are weeks away from death. It's sickening.
?w=344&h=480
?w=604
olddots
(10,237 posts)the agents are the culprits and should be dealt with .
ailsagirl
(22,899 posts)It's all so bizarre-- I guess it's the weird way of thinking that if eight glasses of water per day is healthy, then 80 glasses must be ten times healthier.
Best of luck with your daughter's journey
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)They look sick. Not beautiful, not attractive.
ailsagirl
(22,899 posts)Their very lives hang in the balance... for what? Would anyone honestly want to look like that?
Very sad
24601
(3,962 posts)JudyM
(29,270 posts)Not even very skinny, never mind anorexic. I'm surprised.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Is anyone going to compensate them for being shit listed?
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)The fashion houses and modelling agencies, who are driving these women to anorexia, are the culprits and targets here.
delrem
(9,688 posts)What about the fate of the now-existent models, who suddenly don't fit?
That's only the first of questions.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)or an extra spoonful of beans, get their weight to a more normal, non-lethal range.
Skinny, thin, models will always be the standard. Get real. The only difference is there is suh a thing as "too thin" now. As in, bones sticking out all over the place.