Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 05:08 PM Apr 2015

France's lower house bans ultra-thin models

Source: Deutsche Welle

French lawmakers have approved a new measure that takes aim at anorexic models on the catwalk. Israel and Spain already have bans targeting the fashion industry's penchant for excessively thin women.

On Friday, France's National Assembly, the lower house of parliament, voted in favor of a fine of up to 75,000 euros ($85,000) and up to six months' imprisonment for anyone who employs ultra-thin models.



"Anyone whose body mass index…is below a certain level will not be able to work as a catwalk model," the measure read.

Models must present a medical certificate proving that they have a BMI of at least 18. A woman with a height of 1.75 meters (5.7 feet) who weighed 55 kg (121 lb) would be considered at the extreme lower end of this new scale.

Read more: http://www.dw.de/frances-lower-house-bans-ultra-thin-models/a-18360239



In the land of 'haute couture', they're finally getting real. Healthy women in the real world don't look like that! And who wants to?


42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
France's lower house bans ultra-thin models (Original Post) Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 OP
They did that in Madrid a few years ago rocktivity Apr 2015 #1
I doubt anybody will ultimately be put in jail. I think Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #7
Imprisonment is the only deterrent to anything. Fines are too easy for the valerief Apr 2015 #16
Fashion designers have been trying to make women into pre-adolescent boys for far too long. TygrBright Apr 2015 #2
It's sad. F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #4
Eating disorders are reaching epidemic proportions and Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #6
My 5 year old daughter christx30 Apr 2015 #18
Well done, counter the media indoctrination whenever you can! Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #19
Forgot to add, the slimming and dieting industry in the land Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #8
These designers are not talented enough to design clothes except in straight lines FLPanhandle Apr 2015 #14
That's actually the real answer right there. Xithras Apr 2015 #39
That model looks like horrible! chknltl Apr 2015 #3
Here, here! Really a walking zombie... Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #5
I am not convinced images cause disease AngryAmish Apr 2015 #9
'Images cause disease' indirectly by unduling Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #11
Can an image encourage me to get bladder cancer? AngryAmish Apr 2015 #23
I find both anorexic fashion models and this law kind of creepy. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2015 #10
Similar laws are already in place in other fashion capitals: Italy, Spain. Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #12
What other physical attributes might one ban? jberryhill Apr 2015 #31
Nobody's saying you can't starve yourself to death on your own time and dime... Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #32
Me too Snow Leopard Apr 2015 #13
Exactly, they're essentially excluding a class of people from a particular line of work. Calista241 Apr 2015 #15
and it would be for the same reason too Yupster Apr 2015 #28
Cancer Couture. That's what we should call what these emaciated models are wearing. valerief Apr 2015 #17
WTF? Larry Engels Apr 2015 #21
Sorry for offending cancer. nt valerief Apr 2015 #24
Ah, well. Larry Engels Apr 2015 #20
Well, at least a little more realistically proportioned... Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #22
"skeletel specters" is an apt term ailsagirl Apr 2015 #41
Here are a few... ailsagirl Apr 2015 #25
our daughter is fighting her way back from anorexia olddots Apr 2015 #27
I'm sorry to hear that ailsagirl Apr 2015 #29
Yes, I've seen these pics used in the debate...I feel sorry for them. Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #33
That's for sure ailsagirl Apr 2015 #40
So "my body, my choice" no longer applies. n/t 24601 Apr 2015 #26
The lower end of their acceptable range is slender but not skinny, if those are clear adjectives. JudyM Apr 2015 #30
Does anyone give a shit about the fate of the models? delrem Apr 2015 #34
This legislation is intended to keep them healthy and working... Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #35
Yes. Absolutely. But, in the meantime. delrem Apr 2015 #36
The anorexic models can eat an extra bowl of salad per day, Quantess Apr 2015 #37
The same proportion who cares about overpaid star athletes. closeupready Apr 2015 #38
Like their first lady? (nt) Recursion Apr 2015 #42

rocktivity

(44,577 posts)
1. They did that in Madrid a few years ago
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 05:21 PM
Apr 2015

Last edited Sat Apr 4, 2020, 11:34 AM - Edit history (2)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x5620791

Below 18.5 is considered underweight in America, so while I think the BMI is reasonable, imprisonment is ridiculous. Just pump the fines into six-figure territory and ban any repeat offenders from the business.


rocktivity
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
7. I doubt anybody will ultimately be put in jail. I think
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 06:20 PM
Apr 2015

the law had to conform to a certain legal form--'pour la forme' as they say. More of a deterrent than anything.

Nobody's going to do hard time for hiring a skinny nymphette.

TygrBright

(20,763 posts)
2. Fashion designers have been trying to make women into pre-adolescent boys for far too long.
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 05:25 PM
Apr 2015

I'm not sure exactly what kind of sick fixation it represented initially, but since the early 20th century, the fashion industry has been pretty much dominated by designers who obviously find ordinary adult female morphology repulsive.

This would have gotten them nowhere had there not been a burgeoning advertising industry that realized the profits to be made in convincing women they look unattractive unless they spend buttloads of cash on realizing an unattainable ideal.

disgustedly,
Bright

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
4. It's sad.
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 05:49 PM
Apr 2015

It's always about the money, and no abuse is too great if they can profit off of it.

A bit about why they are so thin here:
http://paleoforwomen.com/two-shocking-dehumanizing-reasons-runway-models-are-so-thin-and-why-we-should-never-aspire-to-look-like-them/

And also, this gives a bit of an overview of the history of thin models, albeit without explaining why so much:
http://onthisdayinfashion.com/?p=10323

A step forwards, here, and I just wish it would be reflected on a wider scale.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
18. My 5 year old daughter
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 03:45 PM
Apr 2015

was holding her mom's fashion magazine a new months ago and said that she thought the model was beautiful. So I got on my phone and showed her a youtube video about hours and hours of work it takes to get that woman to look that attractive. Make-up, hair, lighting, Photoshop. I was using the video to show how unrealistic that level of beauty is. I told her she is the prettiest person I've ever met, but that's not as important as the fact that she's also the kindest, smartest person I've ever met. Then we looked at space videos and rocket lauches ("See how cool that is? You could be doing stuff like that!&quot , which she got a kick out of. I think it had an impact on her.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
8. Forgot to add, the slimming and dieting industry in the land
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 06:23 PM
Apr 2015

of the elegant and svelte is BIG BUSINESS.

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)
14. These designers are not talented enough to design clothes except in straight lines
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 12:09 PM
Apr 2015

Tall, skinny models are probably easy to design for.

Throw in some curves and breasts and many designers are out of their league.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
39. That's actually the real answer right there.
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 12:13 PM
Apr 2015

We tend to pay attention to the people and think that designers are pushing a model of physical beauty onto us, but that's actually not the case. Designers and photographers generally don't care about the models at all. They are pushing the CLOTHES they are wearing. The models body is supposed to be as thin, and as uninteresting as possible so that it doesn't take away from the appearance of the clothing, or introduce any unexpected curves or wrinkles, or require different sizes to fit different people. They want humans whose bodies are uniform and interchangeable, so that any item of clothing can be fit onto any model with a minimum of alteration or tweaking.

The designers want the models to be walking mannequins, not actual PEOPLE, because from their perspective, the human beings are the least important things on that stage or in front of that camera.

chknltl

(10,558 posts)
3. That model looks like horrible!
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 05:29 PM
Apr 2015

(Should the Zombieapocolypse occur, that 'model' might find herself on the wrong side of mistaken identity!)
Ad agencies need to understand that their bottom line is not a good one when it promotes disorders and diseases. I also applaud France's decision.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
9. I am not convinced images cause disease
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 08:16 PM
Apr 2015

But as a workplace safety issue I am fine with this. Kinda like jockeys have to be monitored.

A bit like the photoshop people and seamstress full employment act.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
11. 'Images cause disease' indirectly by unduling
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 05:34 AM
Apr 2015

encouraging young influenceable tweens to try to look like that.

See here:

'Anorexie: "Je mangeais juste une pomme par jour", témoigne l'ex-mannequin Victoire Dauxerre'

(Anorexia: 'I ate just one apple a day, says ex-model Victoire Dauxerre')
http://www.bfmtv.com/societe/anorexie-je-mangeais-juste-une-pomme-par-jour-temoigne-l-ex-mannequin-victoire-dauxerre-874289.html

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
12. Similar laws are already in place in other fashion capitals: Italy, Spain.
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 05:37 AM
Apr 2015

Nobody's going to do hard time for hiring a 'Twiggy'. But, this will keep them off the catwalks and out of the fashion mags.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
32. Nobody's saying you can't starve yourself to death on your own time and dime...
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 02:39 AM
Apr 2015

This is a measure specifically aimed at an industry that exploits young women and poses a clear and present health risk to same.

 

Snow Leopard

(348 posts)
13. Me too
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 11:26 AM
Apr 2015

Seems a little totalitarian for my tastes. Can you imagine if they tried to ban overweight models?

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
15. Exactly, they're essentially excluding a class of people from a particular line of work.
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 02:15 PM
Apr 2015

While their hearts may be in the right place, mandating conformity by law seems a little backwards to me.

Yupster

(14,308 posts)
28. and it would be for the same reason too
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 08:13 PM
Apr 2015

It's unhealthy to be overweight so you can't be hired if you're overweight.

A agree. Too authoritarian for my tastes.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
22. Well, at least a little more realistically proportioned...
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 04:11 PM
Apr 2015

Personally, I'd rather see slim but healthy young women, than these skeletal specters.

ailsagirl

(22,899 posts)
25. Here are a few...
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 07:28 PM
Apr 2015

They look like beautified Dachau victims. It's a horrifying sight. I've seen photos of former models who are afflicted with anorexia, but now they parade around on the runway when they look as though they are weeks away from death. It's sickening.



?w=344&h=480

?w=604

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
27. our daughter is fighting her way back from anorexia
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 07:48 PM
Apr 2015

the agents are the culprits and should be dealt with .

ailsagirl

(22,899 posts)
29. I'm sorry to hear that
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 08:31 PM
Apr 2015

It's all so bizarre-- I guess it's the weird way of thinking that if eight glasses of water per day is healthy, then 80 glasses must be ten times healthier.



Best of luck with your daughter's journey

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
33. Yes, I've seen these pics used in the debate...I feel sorry for them.
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 02:42 AM
Apr 2015

They look sick. Not beautiful, not attractive.

ailsagirl

(22,899 posts)
40. That's for sure
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 01:19 AM
Apr 2015

Their very lives hang in the balance... for what? Would anyone honestly want to look like that?

Very sad

JudyM

(29,270 posts)
30. The lower end of their acceptable range is slender but not skinny, if those are clear adjectives.
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 09:03 PM
Apr 2015

Not even very skinny, never mind anorexic. I'm surprised.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
34. Does anyone give a shit about the fate of the models?
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 03:57 AM
Apr 2015

Is anyone going to compensate them for being shit listed?

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
35. This legislation is intended to keep them healthy and working...
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 04:07 AM
Apr 2015

The fashion houses and modelling agencies, who are driving these women to anorexia, are the culprits and targets here.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
36. Yes. Absolutely. But, in the meantime.
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 04:16 AM
Apr 2015

What about the fate of the now-existent models, who suddenly don't fit?

That's only the first of questions.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
37. The anorexic models can eat an extra bowl of salad per day,
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 05:17 AM
Apr 2015

or an extra spoonful of beans, get their weight to a more normal, non-lethal range.

Skinny, thin, models will always be the standard. Get real. The only difference is there is suh a thing as "too thin" now. As in, bones sticking out all over the place.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»France's lower house bans...