This Woman Says She Had A Miscarriage. Now She Could Face 70 Years In Prison.
Source: ThinkProgress
Depending on the outcome of a hearing scheduled for Monday, a 33-year-old Indiana woman could face up to 70 years in prison for what she says was a miscarriage. Reproductive rights advocates say her case is a disturbing example of overly broad laws that essentially criminalize pregnancy.
Purvi Patel was arrested in 2013 after she went to the emergency room to seek medical treatment for heavy bleeding. After initially denying that she had been pregnant, she eventually told the staff that she had a premature delivery at home, believed the fetus was not alive, and placed it in a bag in a dumpster on her way to the hospital. Her doctors called the cops, who questioned Patel while she was still in the hospital, searched her cell phone records, and recovered the fetus.
Patel maintains that she did not abandon a living baby. I assumed because the baby was dead there was nothing to do, Patel later told law enforcement officials. Ive never been in this situation. Ive never been pregnant before.
snip---
State officials, meanwhile, contend they have evidence to suggest Patel attempted an illegal abortion after purchasing abortion-inducing drugs online. They say she intentionally tried to end her pregnancy even though a toxicologist testified there was no trace of the drugs in her bloodstream and then abandoned her living child after the termination was unsuccessful.
Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/health/2015/03/30/3639736/purvi-patel-sentencing/
It's not just LGBT who are being persecuted in Indiana.
valerief
(53,235 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)She probably should have taken it with her to the hospital for disposal.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)in trouble and the fetus was aborted in the restroom...she was able to take it to the emergency room with her, but it was pretty early in the pregnancy. Maybe early second trimester. She was older and had had 6 pregnancies (and six babies all healthy) earlier so she was a little more savvy about it.
Still, she was sad that she lost the pregnancy.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)She had her kids in twos, a couple of years apart. It was a little strange to me...
She was also very well off, lived in New Canaan CT, a swanky suburb of NYC...so go figure...
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)lark
(23,155 posts)Seems like they are just harassing a woman because she's foreign and they can.
Disgusting miogynists.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)State officials, meanwhile, contend they have evidence to suggest Patel attempted an illegal abortion after purchasing abortion-inducing drugs online.
I thought women had a right to an abortion in this country. Man, this place (USA) is starting to give me creepy crawlers!
lark
(23,155 posts)Fla Dem
(23,741 posts)"State officials, meanwhile, contend they have evidence to suggest Patel attempted an illegal abortion after purchasing abortion-inducing drugs online. They say she intentionally tried to end her pregnancy even though a toxicologist testified there was no trace of the drugs in her bloodstream"
Sharia law is taking over these conservative states.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Then throw out evidence that proves innocence.
Warpy
(111,338 posts)RU-486 only works as an abortifacent in the earliest stages of pregnancy, meaning she wouldn't have delivered a premature fetus, she'd only have delivered blood and a few clots. This sounds like it was too big to flush, something that would not be the case in a medical abortion.
Never mind that abortion is still legal, even in Indiana where the Vatican controls things.
This prosecutor is overreaching, probably up for reelection and trying to grandstand. He needs to be stopped immediately.
What they've got here is the illegal disposal of medical waste/human remains.
Except it's in Indiana.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Anywhere.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Earth_First
(14,910 posts)(ALT 236 for future reference...)
MatthewStLouis
(904 posts)+?
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)then they came for the liberals/progressives, then they came for the ...
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,616 posts)from snuffling up the skirts of the women of the world, stand up on their feet, and act like human beings.
Unpardonable nosiness, invasion of privacy.
This is persecution of the most repugnant form.
Hope a sane person will be involved in the decision made from the hearing.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)It adds a nice truthiness to the charges.
Fla Dem
(23,741 posts)Patel was sentenced to 41 years in prison on Monday afternoon, according to local outlet 95.3 MNC. She plans to appeal.
UPDATE
NewsCenter 16 reports more details on the sentencing, concluding that Patel faces up to 20 years behind bars. She received 30 years in prison for the charge of neglecting a dependent, with 10 suspended. She was also sentenced to six years for the charge of feticide, but would be able to serve that time concurrently.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)and if it did, then it is murder. If the baby was not born alive, she shouldn't be doing jail time.
It sounds like the case was handled improperly. I hope she benefits from a good appellate attorney. However, if she did kill a living baby, prison is warranted.
strategery blunder
(4,225 posts)The article I read alleged the prosecution used a test that had been used, in one form or another, since medieval times, and said test had all the credibility of the witch trials.
Of course, that was never told to the jury...the only way I can conclude the jury found "no reasonable doubt" was if a sharia judge did not properly instruct them on what reasonable doubt is.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)people had to her putting the baby/fetus in the dumpster. That probably swayed the jury.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)DebJ
(7,699 posts)That doesn't make sense to me.
mountain grammy
(26,648 posts)handmade34
(22,757 posts)movement to save this woman from fucking, idiotic, backward christian white man thinking this kind of stuff has no place in the 21st century
Women everywhere should be marching in the streets, boycotting, writing, protesting
this stuff makes me livid beyond belief
deny a woman any control over her body and them send her to prison for being desperate
this is middle ages behavior
fuck the jury, fuck the Gov of Indiana, fuck fundy Christians
this is not right!!
The procedure, known as the lung float test or the the hydrostatic test, was carried out
Its an absolutely discredited test, said Gregory Davis, a professor of pathology and laboratory medicine at the University of Kentucky. It boggles my mind that in the 21st century this test is still being relied upon to determine whether a baby is born alive or dead....
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/crime/2015/02/purvi_patel_feticide_why_did_the_pathologist_use_the_discredited_lung_float.html
blondie58
(2,570 posts)The poor Woman. Even if she purchased online drugs, Last I checked, abortion was legal in parts of the US.
At the very least, she needs a good attorney.
DamnYankeeInHouston
(1,365 posts)Abortion is legal in this country. Case closed. And she may not have even had an abortion.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts). . . there are also Christian misogynists.
Funny how that works.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)They certainly take a keen interest in the fetus, and they'll go to great lengths, spare no expense, to prosecute women for crimes that probably haven't even happened. Too bad they don't get all fired up to do something about other social problems.
countryjake
(8,554 posts)And it's also proof that the anti-abortion activist's campaign against Women's Rights has never been just about abortion, but extends to miscarriage, stillbirth, and the "proper" conduct of any pregnant female.
That the extremely unscientific "float" test was used to determine "life" in this poor woman's case is only one of the outrages of the ordeal that Indiana has put Purvi Patel through...that the rights of her baby have totally superseded every single one of her rights as a living breathing woman should be something that frightens us all.
Long before Roe versus Wade, pregnant women were at the mercy of a government guided by local public opinion and a glowing, beatific visage of a person creating life. Those of us who did not suit that divine mold, who were immersed in endless poverty, considered of "loose" morals, abused by "family" circumstance, or of any racial minority status, at all, could find themselves in deep shit if any little thing went wrong during a gestation or, goddess forbid, they were faced with an unwanted pregnancy with no legal recourse whatsoever to end it.
The many states that now uphold laws against Feticide to successfully persecute, prosecute, and punish a woman, tells me that they have hop-skipped right over any rights to privacy that Roe might have provided us regarding abortion and that anti-women activists, those "pro-life" protagonists, the blowhards who are perpetually marching the hardest and loudest against us, are doing what they've meant to do all along...control women's bodies, absolutely.
question everything
(47,534 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)We are a nation of laws passed by men.