Personal details of world leaders accidentally revealed by G20 organisers
Source: the guardian
The personal details of world leaders at the last G20 summit were accidentally disclosed by the Australian immigration department, which did not consider it necessary to inform those world leaders of the privacy breach.
The Guardian can reveal an employee of the agency inadvertently sent the passport numbers, visa details and other personal identifiers of all world leaders attending the summit to the organisers of the Asian Cup football tournament.
The United States president, Barack Obama, the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, the Japanese prime minister, Shinzo Abe, the Indonesian president, Joko Widodo, and the British prime minister, David Cameron, were among those who attended the Brisbane summit in November and whose details were exposed.
The Australian privacy commissioner was contacted by the director of the visa services division of Australias Department of Immigration and Border Protection to inform them of the data breach on 7 November 2014 and seek urgent advice.
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/30/personal-details-of-world-leaders-accidentally-revealed-by-g20-organisers
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Nobody is immune from having their personal information blasted all over the freakin' internet!!!!!!!!!!
heaven05
(18,124 posts)s*** happens....
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)On every right wing site or show, he was purposely referred to as "Barrack Hussein Obama" thus making the usage nefarious.
Was Jimmy Carter ever called James Earl Carter or JEC? Or Bill Clinton ever referred to as William Jefferson Clinton or WJC?
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)I don't want to call him plain old Obama or BO
elias49
(4,259 posts)Hey, if they have nothing to hide...
herding cats
(19,567 posts)But how it was dealt with is problematic.
Given that the risks of the breach are considered very low and the actions that have been taken to limit the further distribution of the email, I do not consider it necessary to notify the clients of the breach, she wrote.
The recommendation not to disclose the breach to the world leaders may be at odds with privacy law in some of their countries.