Publishers say they stand by Fox's Bill O'Reilly
Source: AP-Excite
By DAVID BAUDER
NEW YORK (AP) Bill O'Reilly's book publishers say they stand behind the Fox News Channel host's work despite questions that have been raised about his reporting.
O'Reilly's series of books about the deaths of John F. Kennedy, Abraham Lincoln and Jesus Christ have sold millions of copies and been turned into successful movies for the National Geographic channel. The latest adaptation, "Killing Jesus," is set to premiere on that network on Palm Sunday.
The liberal watchdog Media Matters for America this week reported on a 2013 Web post that questioned O'Reilly's claim that in 1977, he was outside the Florida home of George de Mohrenschildt, a friend of Kennedy assassin Lee Harvey Oswald, when he killed himself with a shotgun. De Mohrenschildt had been contacted by congressional investigators looking into the assassination.
O'Reilly's claim that he was there was in his book, "Killing Kennedy." Media Matters quoted police reports, media accounts, former colleagues and other sources that dispute O'Reilly's claim that he was there. At the time, O'Reilly was a reporter for a Dallas television station.
FULL story at link.
FILE - In this Oct. 28, 2013 file photo, political commentator Bill O'Reilly attends the National Geographic Channel's "Killing Kennedy" world premiere screening reception at The Newseum, in Washington. O'Reilly, Fox News Channel's prime-time star, is accused of claiming he had reported in a combat zone for CBS News during the 1982 Falklands War when he was more than a thousand miles from the front. (Photo by Paul Morigi/Invision/AP, File)
Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20150225/us--tv-oreilly_reporting-ef263fb06d.html
randys1
(16,286 posts)eggplant
(3,912 posts)by PACs and others, then are given away or sold as premiums for fundraisers. In one fell swoop, the book ends up on the NYT bestseller list, Billo cashes a big check, and the GOP noise machine turns its crank another time.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)eggplant
(3,912 posts)On both sides of the aisle, unfortunately. I do think their side does a lot more of it, though.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Well, we only printed the lies...we didn't make them up.
Companies like this deserve to go out of business.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)No..every reporter who was with Bill O'lier (back when) said he Lied.
Questions my ass.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)I may have spelled falafel wrong.
...loofah.
tanyev
(42,594 posts)*not intended to be a factual statement
underpants
(182,863 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)underpants
(182,863 posts)They just see their invincible hero playing victim
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)I suspect your doubt is well grounded...not that it would make any difference if they did know.
Kingofalldems
(38,468 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,835 posts)He makes them money. Nuff said.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Offenses: Fabricated quotes. Plagiarized himself.
Fate: Two of his books were abruptly withdrawn from the market, including Imagine, which was on the LA Times bestseller list for many weeks.
O'Reilly: Blowhard, narcissist, stalker, yellow journalist
Offenses: Repeated pattern of lying, falsely claiming to witness and report on crucial events.
Fate: Publisher stands by his work despite mounting allegations about his serial tendency to fudge the facts.
kimbutgar
(21,174 posts)The two right wingers we packed for had all these right wing books and none of them appeared to have been read. The spines never were cracked. One guy had all the o wrongly books never read. He was such a jerk. The move was so stressful his wife separated from him at the end if it and she moved in with her son and he moved to Reno where he said the " right" kind of people lived like him.
albino65
(484 posts)I vow to never watch that channel again
tsites
(36 posts)for a long time. They stopped being a reliable scientific pub a long time ago. It is now just a popularity driven media enterprise. Their screw up with the fake bird fossil a few years back will be feeding creationist propaganda for a long time. Most of what they have in the magazine is little more than travelog for the wealthy. It could easily be mistaken for a Conde Nast mag. The little science they have rarely goes into any depth and they avoid controversy by selectively avoiding many topics.
You used to have to be a member of the society to get the magazine and you could not become a member without a recommendation. If you didn't know a member, they would accept the recommendation of a member of the military, preferably a retired officer. This tended to skew the kind of people who received the magazine and supported the society with donations. Whereas in the past (50 years ago or more) they supported all kinds of scientific explorations and projects, now days they only fund rich person fantasy projects like James Cameron's dive into the Mariana Trench (he should have enough money to fund it himself), in which they have withheld all scientific data for three years now so as not to impact revenue from their feature film (don't want to spoil the excitement). I'm tempted to believe they didn't find anything worth paying to see on the big screen and have been working frantically trying to come up with some way to stretch 5 minutes worth of interesting into two hours of razel dazel without the movie being panned so badly that no one comes.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)How long can Fox itself avoid culpability?
JHB
(37,161 posts)It's not as if this will deter the people who buy Billo's books. They'll slurp up his sneering denials and fork over more money for his next exercise in stilted history.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)This is no ordinary exposure of lies at Fox.
DescendantOfMany
(22 posts)He would be proud of these publishers and Mr. O'Reilly.