Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 05:32 PM Feb 2015

U.S. Rhetoric Collides With Iraqi Reality in Islamic State Fight

Source: Bloomberg

by John WalcottZaid SabahDavid Lerman
3:09 PM EST February 20, 2015


(Bloomberg) -- An Iraqi military officer said Friday his nation’s troops will need six months to get ready to retake the city of Mosul from Islamic State, undercutting a U.S. statement that the assault would begin as early as April.

The gap between American rhetoric and Iraqi reality has raised questions about why U.S. officials are taking the unusual step of telegraphing publicly to the enemy details of a planned military operation that is months away.

On Thursday, an official from the U.S. Central Command said the U.S. and Iraq are planning an April or May offensive that will require five Iraqi brigades with 20,000 to 25,000 troops to defeat 1,000 to 2,000 Islamic State fighters in the country’s second-largest city.

On Friday, an officer in the Iraqi defense ministry said in a telephone interview that it will take at least until August to arm and train Iraqi forces and resolve their differences with local allies -- Kurdish fighters and Shiite paramilitary forces -- that the officer said are stronger and more capable than the Iraqi army.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-20/u-s-rhetoric-collides-with-iraqi-reality-in-islamic-state-fight

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Rhetoric Collides With Iraqi Reality in Islamic State Fight (Original Post) Purveyor Feb 2015 OP
to capture Mosul. different idea...starve them out...nt quadrature Feb 2015 #1
Then all their prisoners and others in the city will also starve Lurks Often Feb 2015 #2
that is exactly right quadrature Feb 2015 #3
The US has committed too many atrocities in the ME, already. ronnie624 Feb 2015 #4
It's good you won't be making that decision then Lurks Often Feb 2015 #5
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
2. Then all their prisoners and others in the city will also starve
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 11:39 PM
Feb 2015

including children and elderly that have nothing to do with ISIL.

 

quadrature

(2,049 posts)
3. that is exactly right
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 12:07 AM
Feb 2015

that is the decision that
has to be made.

if we allow food in to Mosul,
we are feeding ISIS

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
4. The US has committed too many atrocities in the ME, already.
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 04:08 AM
Feb 2015

There will never be peace there, until Western powers seriously reconsider their self-serving policies of violence and dominance to control energy resources in the region. Attacking civilians, including through starvation, is a violation of international law.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
5. It's good you won't be making that decision then
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 11:55 AM
Feb 2015

I am NOT ok with starving innocent people or prisoners to get those ISIL members in Mosul.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Rhetoric Collides Wi...