Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

aggiesal

(8,915 posts)
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 08:34 PM Feb 2015

Washington state judge rules against florist who refused gay wedding

Source: Reuters

(Reuters) - A judge in Washington state on Wednesday ruled that a florist who refused to sell flower arrangements for a gay couple's wedding violated state anti-discrimination law, court records show.

Florist Barronelle Stutzman was sued by both the state Attorney General Bob Ferguson and the couple, Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed, in 2013.

The pair were longtime customers of Stutzman's Richland business, Arlene's Flowers, and asked her to provide decorations for their wedding following the state's legalization of same-sex marriage.

Stutzman maintained that her Christian beliefs prevented her from selling flowers for the same-sex wedding, "because of (her) relationship with Jesus Christ," according to court documents.

"Confirming the enactment of same-sex marriage, there would eventually be a direct and insoluble conflict between Stutzman's religiously motivated conduct and the laws of the state of Washington," Benton County Superior Court Judge Alexander Ekstrom said in his 60-page opinion.

...

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/19/us-usa-washington-gaymarriage-idUSKBN0LN0B520150219








Need I say more?
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Washington state judge rules against florist who refused gay wedding (Original Post) aggiesal Feb 2015 OP
I Love it! BlueJazz Feb 2015 #1
Unless Jesus was one of the people getting married... jberryhill Feb 2015 #2
I agree, ... aggiesal Feb 2015 #4
"While religious beliefs are protected by the First Amendment, actions based on those beliefs.... uppityperson Feb 2015 #3
So, what's the punishment? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2015 #5
Lots more here: blkmusclmachine Feb 2015 #6
I don't understand reusing to christx30 Feb 2015 #7
So what about Hobby Lobby and SC sanctioned religious nuttery? BrotherIvan Feb 2015 #8
so it was okay to take their money when they were only living together? niyad Feb 2015 #9
Holier than thou piece of shit. Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2015 #10
I hope she dies penniless mwrguy Feb 2015 #11
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
2. Unless Jesus was one of the people getting married...
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 08:44 PM
Feb 2015

...then I can't see how her relationship with Jesus enters into the picture of whether she can sell flowers to them.

aggiesal

(8,915 posts)
4. I agree, ...
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 09:03 PM
Feb 2015

We have a secular government.

The florists' have to understand that it's OK to have their relation with Jesus,
but even Jesus, said "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's"

i.e. If you want the benefits that the tax base gives you (roads, water, ...)
that allows you to make a profit and a living, then everyone that gives to
Caesar (government) is entitled to your service.

I think they tend to forget that.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
3. "While religious beliefs are protected by the First Amendment, actions based on those beliefs....
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 08:45 PM
Feb 2015

"While religious beliefs are protected by the First Amendment, actions based on those beliefs aren’t necessarily protected, he said. "
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2025728983_judgewashingtonfloristwhorefusedgayweddingbrokelaw1888xml.html

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
5. So, what's the punishment?
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 09:06 PM
Feb 2015

I mean, aside from the fact any rational person shouldn't patronize this business again?

These lawsuits make little sense to me. Spread the word, boycott, and patronize progressive businesses. I don't want assholes to be forced to take my money.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
7. I don't understand reusing to
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 09:37 PM
Feb 2015

make a floral arrangment or bake a cake. "Jesus will hate me and send me to hell for making the bouquet."
Why not just do your job, take the money, and move on with your life? The wedding is not about the church, and it's sure as hell not about you. Get over yourself.

That said, I don't understand suing if someone doesn't want to do the work for you. These days there are services all over the place. If someone doesn't want your money, give it to someone else.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
8. So what about Hobby Lobby and SC sanctioned religious nuttery?
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 10:36 PM
Feb 2015

I'm glad this judge wasn't such a nut. And Mrs. Stutzman had better go back and read her Bible where Jesus didn't say anything about being gay.

 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
10. Holier than thou piece of shit.
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 11:12 AM
Feb 2015

From the fair and balanced Fox News (sic) dot com:

"Waggoner is referring to the Attorney General’s decision to seek legal fees and penalties not only against Arlene’s Flower shop - but also Stutzman personally.

The law allows for penalties of up to $2,000 per violation — and Waggoner said the flower shop has been inundated with requests to provide flowers to gay weddings. Each one of those requests would be a violation, she said.

“Every time someone comes in you get tagged with a $2,000 fine,” she said. “They’re setting her up.”

And should they lose the appeal, there’s a very real chance Stutzman could lose her home."

BWAHAHAHA!! Come'on all you gay marriers, tell her to bake you a cake - and make sure she knows you are GAY!!!!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Washington state judge ru...