Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 01:08 AM Feb 2015

Armed gun-rights advocates rally at Washington state capitol

Source: Associated Press

Armed gun-rights advocates rally at Washington state capitol
By DERRICK NUNNALLY, Associated Press | February 7, 2015 | Updated: February 7, 2015 3:54pm


[font size=1]
Photo By Elaine Thompson/AP

Marie McFadden holds her daughter, Faith, 6, as she prays with armed demonstrators as the group
concludes a gun-rights rally at the state capitol Saturday, Feb. 7, 2015, in Olympia, Wash.
Approximately 50 demonstrators, including a half-dozen small children, protested rules that prohibit
openly carrying guns into the House and Senate viewing galleries.
[/font]
OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — A gun-rights rally drew about 50 people, mostly armed, to the steps of the Capitol on Saturday morning for a demonstration they hoped would end with their arrest. To raise money for bail, some protesters hawked caps with "Fight Tyranny — Shoot Back" printed on them and sold out.

The plan was to walk into the Capitol after a few speeches and carry guns into the Legislature's viewing gallery, in defiance of rule changes made in January that banned the open carry of firearms there. However, the Washington State Patrol kept the gallery doors locked after the building opened to the public at 11 a.m. The crowd, including two state legislators, walked through the marble hallways, with some lining up to knock on the doors to the House gallery and Gov. Jay Inslee's office.

No one was arrested, and the State Patrol reported no disturbances. The protesters went instead to the closed gate of the governor's mansion and prayed.

"What's the world coming to when there are people who want to break the law and they won't let you do it?" said Dave Grenier, 58, of Tumwater, as his fellow pro-gun demonstrators began to file out of the Capitol.

Their complaints against state government stem from the 2014 passage of Initiative 594 by voters statewide. It imposed new background-check requirements on several types of gun transfers, including purchases and loans, and opponents say the new law infringes on firearm rights guaranteed in the state and federal constitutions.


Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Gun-rights-advocates-rally-at-Washington-state-6068480.php

71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Armed gun-rights advocates rally at Washington state capitol (Original Post) Judi Lynn Feb 2015 OP
Huh. I know someone in that crowd. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #1
Do tell! Suich Feb 2015 #2
Yeah, so do I alcina Feb 2015 #22
I've seen some guys like this so uptight I think they're going to crack. Just super anxious and RKP5637 Feb 2015 #26
I caused some serious anxiety for one guy alcina Feb 2015 #27
... RKP5637 Feb 2015 #35
un--never good to mess with paranoid riversedge Feb 2015 #37
Thank you for wise advice alcina Feb 2015 #56
of course there is more going on Skittles Feb 2015 #71
Gun Nutters doing what they do best... SoapBox Feb 2015 #3
"looking"???? nt Cryptoad Feb 2015 #23
Of course they prayed, because Jesus was this huge gun proponent. pnwmom Feb 2015 #4
Who needs bullets when you've got PRAYER and JEEZUS on your side ?!?! blkmusclmachine Feb 2015 #9
I know it is what they want, but they should be arrested for brandishing and their guns confiscated on point Feb 2015 #5
What do you mean 'getting' ? they're psycho YOHABLO Feb 2015 #6
Brandishing has legal meaning, and no one in that article is doing so. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #7
You need to look up the legal definition of brandishing Nt hack89 Feb 2015 #14
Ix-nay on the "andishing-bray" word. Paladin Feb 2015 #39
Oh damn, do I rec your post! BrotherIvan Feb 2015 #49
when talking about definitions of crimes Amishman Feb 2015 #58
This is an online talk site, not a court of law. Paladin Feb 2015 #59
Problem is, the term describes an actual crime. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #63
I stand by my prior comments. (nt) Paladin Feb 2015 #64
And you're welcome to your opinion. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #65
I'll rely on the same source for definitions of "brandish," "assault rifle," "arsenal," etc. : Paladin Feb 2015 #66
I didn't know Wayne LaPierre owned Websters, American Heritage, and other dictionaries. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #67
Don't be obtuse, it doesn't suit you. Paladin Feb 2015 #68
I prefer pedantic. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #69
They're protesting against Washington State's new background check law. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #8
Wonder if they support an inalienable right to vote cprise Feb 2015 #12
Nope. They're more into made up "rights" rather than what is actually written in the Constitution. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #19
Both the Democratic Party platform and President Obama would disagree hack89 Feb 2015 #32
Well thanks to the right wing 5 on the Supreme Court, their rewrite of the 2nd Am is now law. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #40
President Obama and Congressional Dems have been very good to gun owners hack89 Feb 2015 #41
Tell your bullshit to someone else. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #45
UBCs could have passed if gun control advocates hadn't overplayed their hand hack89 Feb 2015 #48
those pesky facts again Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #51
You nailed it... We have got a lot of these RWNJs voting here. They're screwing life up for us. freshwest Feb 2015 #47
Actually ignoring them is the best way to handle them. Let them move on with out media coverage. kelliekat44 Feb 2015 #10
if they want attention, go see their buddie McCain! McCain shouts, "get a job you scum!" Sunlei Feb 2015 #11
Losers. nt onehandle Feb 2015 #13
ROFL SoapBox Feb 2015 #16
Praying for guns......WTF is wrong with these people.. Historic NY Feb 2015 #15
Gun activists are largely fundies who ignore the messages of peace in the new testament. onehandle Feb 2015 #20
'Cause that King Jamed guy changed it...nt freebrew Feb 2015 #34
And since king James was gay, that makes it part of the homosexual agenda Nobel_Twaddle_III Feb 2015 #43
stupid, paranoid assholes Skittles Feb 2015 #70
594 was approved by the majority of voters.... paleotn Feb 2015 #17
Exactly! jen1980 Feb 2015 #52
Or just wait the rest of the 2-year editing limit ManiacJoe Feb 2015 #60
The police are preventing judicial review by denying them grounds to sue Taitertots Feb 2015 #18
"What's the world coming to when there are people who want to break the law and they won't let you onehandle Feb 2015 #21
I'm stilling trying to understand its meaning. rickford66 Feb 2015 #44
Guns are now prohibited in the Viewing Galleries. ManiacJoe Feb 2015 #61
"Look at me!" old guy Feb 2015 #24
all seven of them? nt Cryptoad Feb 2015 #25
In the....fucking.....viewing gallery!!!!???? louis-t Feb 2015 #28
White wingers sporting their weapons. Typical gun fanciers. Hoyt Feb 2015 #29
What's the world coming to when there are people who want to break the law and they won't let you do mentalslavery Feb 2015 #30
Stupid fucking gun nuts jpak Feb 2015 #31
The people in this picture may very well be among the dumbest of our species. world wide wally Feb 2015 #33
future murderers just waiting for the right opportunity to kill someone they blame for their whereisjustice Feb 2015 #36
There are several more photos at the link including this one. riversedge Feb 2015 #38
Child endangerment. nt SunSeeker Feb 2015 #46
How sweet. Wouldn't that make a great Norman Rockwell painting? Daddy brought 2 guns. Awwwww. n/t Judi Lynn Feb 2015 #55
Huh, I wonder what have happened if they DiverDave Feb 2015 #42
Shitheads and crazies alcibiades_mystery Feb 2015 #50
Is this the same state . . . Brigid Feb 2015 #53
Typical Gun Nut maniacs rstanleyj2918ca Feb 2015 #54
wonder if they realize guns don't have rights...people do. ileus Feb 2015 #57
some of these " people " are sitting on stock piles of ammo olddots Feb 2015 #62

alcina

(602 posts)
22. Yeah, so do I
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 11:40 AM
Feb 2015

And he -- along with several of the other pro-gun guys I know -- is taking heavy doses of anti-anxiety meds. I've often wondered if the gun obsession is a form of OCD for which the meds provide some mild relief, or if the meds are to offset their fears about having their guns taken away.

RKP5637

(67,109 posts)
26. I've seen some guys like this so uptight I think they're going to crack. Just super anxious and
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 12:13 PM
Feb 2015

with their guns and all. IMO there's a lot more gong on than just gun rights with them.

alcina

(602 posts)
27. I caused some serious anxiety for one guy
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 12:34 PM
Feb 2015

An acquaintance was blathering on one time about his compound, bunker, stash of weapons, blah blah blah. And at some point, he asked me if I had a plan for when the "inevitable" happens. (Never did quite find out which "inevitable" he meant, but whatever.) I replied that, since I knew where he lived, my plan was to take him out first, and then survive on his stash.

For months afterward, he would periodically ask a mutual friend if I was serious.

Silly me. I never should have shown my hand.

alcina

(602 posts)
56. Thank you for wise advice
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 04:18 PM
Feb 2015

Had I known how paranoid he was, I probably would not have made that comment to him. Thankfully, I now live thousands of miles away, so I shouldn't have to worry.

But now I need a plan B.

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
71. of course there is more going on
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 04:52 PM
Feb 2015

they're paranoid idiots - they should be investing in therapy instead of guns

on point

(2,506 posts)
5. I know it is what they want, but they should be arrested for brandishing and their guns confiscated
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 02:18 AM
Feb 2015

and their gun rights stripped.

These fools are terrorists and getting dangerous to the country.

Paladin

(28,262 posts)
39. Ix-nay on the "andishing-bray" word.
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 04:00 PM
Feb 2015

The pro-gun crowd will nail you for it if it doesn't meet the NRA-approved definition......

I'm jesting, of course; "brandishing" is an accurate and legitimate description of what's going on. We need to quit ceding vocabulary control to the gun enthusiasts; we've allowed it to go on for way too long......

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
49. Oh damn, do I rec your post!
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 08:31 PM
Feb 2015

Letting the gunners define the definitions and hence the laws is about as smart as allowing 'pro-lifers' to define what means life. Stop the madness already.

Amishman

(5,557 posts)
58. when talking about definitions of crimes
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 10:55 AM
Feb 2015

everyone should follow the correct legal definition.

encouraging arrests when a crime is not being committed just wastes police resources, and potentially opens the door to wrongful arrest / imprisonment lawsuits.

Paladin

(28,262 posts)
59. This is an online talk site, not a court of law.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:05 AM
Feb 2015

Imposition of hyper-detailed definitions online has been used by pro-gun types to stifle and intimidate pro-control advocates, and to avoid meaningful discussion of the actual issues at hand. This practice has gone on way too long and needs to stop. We don't allow our opponents to control the vocabulary on right-to-life and foreign policy matters; the same should be true regarding gun control.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
63. Problem is, the term describes an actual crime.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 05:46 PM
Feb 2015

AND there have been some people on this site that link it to actually calling the cops whenever they see someone doing it.

So it matters in this context.

bran·dish
(brăn?dĭsh)
tr.v. bran·dished, bran·dish·ing, bran·dish·es
To wave or flourish (something, often a weapon) in a menacing, defiant, or excited way. See Synonyms at flourish.

n.
A menacing, defiant, or excited wave or flourish of something.


And that's not even a legal dictionary.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
65. And you're welcome to your opinion.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 06:31 PM
Feb 2015

I would probably fully agree with you, if 'brandish' was a softer definition in common use, along the lines of 'displaying' or 'visible'. Certainly when people open carry, it is visible.

Paladin

(28,262 posts)
66. I'll rely on the same source for definitions of "brandish," "assault rifle," "arsenal," etc. :
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 07:15 PM
Feb 2015
Whatever the New York Times says they are, on any given day.

Better that, than definitions which are vetted, approved, and then forced into public discourse by the likes of Wayne LaPierre and Ted Nugent, on behalf of the pro-gun militancy movement.

But you too are welcome to your opinion.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
67. I didn't know Wayne LaPierre owned Websters, American Heritage, and other dictionaries.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 07:18 PM
Feb 2015

NYT sometimes uses pro-gun language, does it not?

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
69. I prefer pedantic.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 07:50 PM
Feb 2015

I try to keep my terminology tight (and point it out on same team conversations), because it makes it easier to call out the other side on disingenuous bullshit, when they can't point a finger back. Normally it doesn't matter though. They'll be disingenuous regardless.

SunSeeker

(51,559 posts)
8. They're protesting against Washington State's new background check law.
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 02:39 AM
Feb 2015

They claim it infringes on their right to have guns. And yet they all have guns and don't cite to one person who should have a gun who was denied a gun by that law. Considering 90% of Americans favor universal background checks, these idiots apparently have a big problem with Americans.

cprise

(8,445 posts)
12. Wonder if they support an inalienable right to vote
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 07:20 AM
Feb 2015

Seems much of the pro-gun supporters are in favor of barring people from the polls based on vague suspicions.

SunSeeker

(51,559 posts)
19. Nope. They're more into made up "rights" rather than what is actually written in the Constitution.
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 10:43 AM
Feb 2015

Like the "right to fire arms." They and the right wing 5 on our Supreme Court overturned long standing Supreme Court precedent and disregarded historical fact, and the actual words in the Constitution, in interpreting the Second Amendment as enshrining some kind of individual right to guns, when it is and always has been about the right to maintain a public militia so as to avoid standing armies.

Right to vote? Promotion of the general welfare? Not respecting an establishment of religion? In other words, the HEART of our Constitution? They happily ignore it.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
32. Both the Democratic Party platform and President Obama would disagree
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 01:23 PM
Feb 2015

both say the 2A protects an individual right to own guns. It is not just the right wing you are fighting on this issue.

SunSeeker

(51,559 posts)
40. Well thanks to the right wing 5 on the Supreme Court, their rewrite of the 2nd Am is now law.
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 04:17 PM
Feb 2015

The Dems are picking their battles until we get a progressive majority on the Supreme Court.

Don’t worry, no one is coming after your precious guns.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
41. President Obama and Congressional Dems have been very good to gun owners
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 04:30 PM
Feb 2015

I don't worry about anyone taking away my guns - haven't for a very long time.

You understand that the SC has said that the 2A allows the strict regulation of guns. Registration, AWBs, UBCs are all perfectly legal and constitutional. So stop blaming the SC and the 2A. Your problem is a lack of widespread popular support. If you had the votes you would have the laws you want.

SunSeeker

(51,559 posts)
45. Tell your bullshit to someone else.
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 08:06 PM
Feb 2015

Popular support is not what is stopping common sense gun control. 90% of Americans want universal background checks, yet our so-called representatives didn't let it pass. Now that owning a gun has been elevated to a constitutional right by those 5 right wing idiots on the Supreme Court, the NRA has even more ammunition to bat down such reforms, particularly in court. Dems and Obama decided to just move on and deal with other problems.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
48. UBCs could have passed if gun control advocates hadn't overplayed their hand
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 08:30 PM
Feb 2015

remember that instead of showing some restraint they tried to pass every possible gun control law including an AWB - all at once in one big package. If they had tried to pass UBCs by itself it most likely would have passed.

And remember that it was Harry Reid in the Senate that killed it as he tried to protect Dems from pro-gun states as they ran for reelection.

 

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)
10. Actually ignoring them is the best way to handle them. Let them move on with out media coverage.
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 06:52 AM
Feb 2015

They will end up doing something stupid to each other.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
16. ROFL
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 10:34 AM
Feb 2015

Oh my gosh...I'm always trying to come up with some witty, insulting post , when there are such stories but...losers.

I don't think I've thought of that in years. It's a perfect description.

(This also got me wondering how many of these losers, are getting some form of gub'ment help.)

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
15. Praying for guns......WTF is wrong with these people..
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 10:19 AM
Feb 2015

where is it in the bible that Jesus went into the desert and prayed 40 days for guns.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
20. Gun activists are largely fundies who ignore the messages of peace in the new testament.
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 11:32 AM
Feb 2015

Really, it's just the modern day Klan. They did the same thing.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
18. The police are preventing judicial review by denying them grounds to sue
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 10:37 AM
Feb 2015

I agree with the open carry restrictions. They should arrest people for breaking it and let them have their day in court.

This is not something we should be happy about.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
21. "What's the world coming to when there are people who want to break the law and they won't let you
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 11:37 AM
Feb 2015

...do it?"

I had to read that three times before I was sure I got it right.

I wonder what they would do if a black male child with Skittles and iced tea wanted to rally on their front yards?

Wait... I know...

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
61. Guns are now prohibited in the Viewing Galleries.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 07:16 PM
Feb 2015

Just like signs and banners are banned.

The protesters wanted to take their guns into the viewing galleries and get arrested. Instead the cops just stopped them from entering the galleries with their guns.

louis-t

(23,295 posts)
28. In the....fucking.....viewing gallery!!!!????
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 12:52 PM
Feb 2015

"Hey Senator, I don't think I liked the way you voted on that bill." Blam! Blam!

 

mentalslavery

(463 posts)
30. What's the world coming to when there are people who want to break the law and they won't let you do
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 01:17 PM
Feb 2015

Its called deterrence jack-ass.

world wide wally

(21,744 posts)
33. The people in this picture may very well be among the dumbest of our species.
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 02:14 PM
Feb 2015

Any of them would just blend in with the population in "Idiocracy".
I wish I was joking!

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
36. future murderers just waiting for the right opportunity to kill someone they blame for their
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 03:28 PM
Feb 2015

own bad choices.

DiverDave

(4,886 posts)
42. Huh, I wonder what have happened if they
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 04:37 PM
Feb 2015

were black?

Entitled white lunatics, being treated with kid gloves.
Figures...they ought to be in jail.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
53. Is this the same state . . .
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 09:31 PM
Feb 2015

Where idiots like this ( or maybe it's the same idiots) who caused a ruckus recently by storming the state capitol building with their Precious?

 

rstanleyj2918ca

(8 posts)
54. Typical Gun Nut maniacs
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 10:08 PM
Feb 2015

When will this country ever get some sense, and restrict access of these dangerous, murdering machines to these nutcases? Sheesh!

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
62. some of these " people " are sitting on stock piles of ammo
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 07:43 PM
Feb 2015

the threat of that potential catastrophe out weighs their dumbth .

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Armed gun-rights advocate...