Brad Ashford (D-NE) thinks Congress needs a pay cut — so he's donating 10% of his $174K salary
Source: Omaha World Herald
By Joseph Morton
WASHINGTON Congress needs to take a pay cut.
At least, thats the opinion of Reps. Brad Ashford, D-Neb., and Dave Loebsack, D-Iowa.
Ashford has signed on to Loebsacks proposal to reduce by 10 percent the salaries of members of Congress now set at $174,000.
The last four years in Congress have been some of the least productive in our nations history, said Ashford, who was elected in November. The partisanship and gridlock have reached an all-time high, and when I travel around the 2nd District, Nebraskans tell me they want accountability.
FULL story at link.
KENT SIEVERS
Democrat Brad Ashford says its silly for members of Congress to be paid so much when they do so little.
Read more: http://www.omaha.com/news/politics/brad-ashford-thinks-congress-needs-a-pay-cut-so-he/article_cbca23f3-23bc-508d-af1d-8c7bb4b067eb.html
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)There's no way U.S. M$M will report on this. Instead, they'll probably go on the defensive with a potential war with Russia, etc., etc., oh, and the gratuitous, "Obama is unpopular!" meme.
fbc
(1,668 posts)It sounds too much like a "big government spends too much" move and our problem, as pointed out by the group of economists that always turns out to be right, has been that the US government has not spent enough.
mpcamb
(2,871 posts)Hope we're wrong about it being ignored, too.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)geomon666
(7,512 posts)Public servants and all that.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)even pay millions of their own money to get the job.
Most of them are bought and paid for by the 1% so why should the taxpayers have to contribute too?
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)But Pukes, Baggers and DINO's would just say no...actually,
crickets.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)I have been following Brad Ashford and he is very strange.
And that's why I think he's a one termer.
And Congress is a lot of bad things, but overpaid is not one of them.
If you pay Congressmen peanuts, then you're making it all the more impossible for modest income people to serve. If their salaries are too low, the only people who will serve are rich people who don't need the money.