Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Feb 3, 2015, 02:11 PM Feb 2015

EPA Keystone Review Links Oil Sands to Carbon Emission Jump

Source: Bloomberg

(Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said developing Canadian oil sands would significantly increase greenhouse gases, a conclusion environmental groups said gives President Barack Obama reason to reject the proposed Keystone XL pipeline.

“Until ongoing efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production of oil sands are more successful and widespread,” developing the crude “represents a significant increase in greenhouse gas emissions,” the EPA said Tuesday in a letter to the State Department, which is reviewing the project.

The proposed pipeline has pitted Obama’s allies in the environmental movement against the U.S. energy industry. Obama has said he’ll reject TransCanada Corp.’s Keystone if it would lead to a significant increase in carbon pollution.

Proposed in 2008, Keystone would deliver Alberta oil sands to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries. The Republican-led House next week probably will pass a Senate bill to approve the pipeline and circumvent the State Department review. Obama said he will veto the measure and continue with his administration’s review. Supporters don’t appear to have the votes to override a veto.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-03/epa-keystone-review-links-oil-sands-to-higher-carbon-emissions

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EPA Keystone Review Links Oil Sands to Carbon Emission Jump (Original Post) Purveyor Feb 2015 OP
Oil sands are the dirtiest fuel source this side of coal. The fields should be shut down, reclaimed. leveymg Feb 2015 #1
Damn near worse. Panich52 Feb 2015 #3
Cute stuff! Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2015 #4
Thanks Obama for early 1st term upgrade to the EPA :). The changes start to have an impact! Sunlei Feb 2015 #2

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
3. Damn near worse.
Tue Feb 3, 2015, 09:01 PM
Feb 2015

Google Alberta tar sands images. Looks as devastating as mountaintopping. And releases even more methane than coal. EPA's 'announcement' is hardly a surprise. Except maybe to Boehner and his personal financial interest in the toxic environmental disaster.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
2. Thanks Obama for early 1st term upgrade to the EPA :). The changes start to have an impact!
Tue Feb 3, 2015, 02:18 PM
Feb 2015

republicans must have missed the changes, everyone knows republicans don't care at all about clean air and water

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»EPA Keystone Review Links...