Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

avebury

(10,952 posts)
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 05:29 PM Dec 2017

Trump Judicial Nominee Drops Out After Embarrassing Hearing

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-judicial-nominee-matthew-petersen_us_5a37ec14e4b0ff955ad51e82?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009

President Donald Trump’s judicial nominee Matthew Petersen has withdrawn his name from consideration after a video went viral of him failing to answer basic questions about law in his confirmation hearing.


In his letter to the president, Petersen said he’s withdrawing because he doesn’t want to be “a distraction” to the administration.


“I had hoped that my nearly two decades of public service might carry more weight than my two worst minutes on television,” he said. “However, I am no stranger to political realities, and I do not wish to be a continued distraction from the important work of your Administration and the Senate.”

Petersen is Trump’s third district court nominee to get derailed over a lack of qualifications. Brett Talley, a 36-year-old lawyer who had never tried a case and earned a rare and unanimous “not qualified” rating by the American Bar Association, withdrew his nomination last week. Jeff Mateer, who had described transgender children as evidence of “Satan’s plan,” is not moving either.

Kennedy said Trump has also told him that he’s counting on senators to reject his bad judicial picks.

---

More proof that Trump could care less about actually taking the time to do his job.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump Judicial Nominee Drops Out After Embarrassing Hearing (Original Post) avebury Dec 2017 OP
Thank God for these small wins! nt ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #1
Two decades of public service and he is only 36 yrs old? Irish_Dem Dec 2017 #2
Talley is a different unqualified nominee dsc Dec 2017 #9
Thank you for the correction and clarification. I cannot keep the Trump rejects straight. Irish_Dem Dec 2017 #10
But but but he has the best people onecaliberal Dec 2017 #3
The guy was a complete embarrassment. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2017 #4
He did stay at a Holiday Inn Express however. Dread Pirate Roberts Dec 2017 #5
Gee Matt, ya think? gratuitous Dec 2017 #6
"....counting on senators to reject his bad judicial picks. " dixiegrrrrl Dec 2017 #7
reject them??? onethatcares Dec 2017 #8
Goodbye to this dunce malaise Dec 2017 #11

Irish_Dem

(47,270 posts)
2. Two decades of public service and he is only 36 yrs old?
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 05:33 PM
Dec 2017

Guess he graduated from Law School when he was 15 which explains why he does not display basic knowledge of the law.

dsc

(52,166 posts)
9. Talley is a different unqualified nominee
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 06:15 PM
Dec 2017

I know, it is hard to keep them apart, but the 36 year old is Talley the guy who just withdrew is someone else.

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
4. The guy was a complete embarrassment.
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 05:38 PM
Dec 2017

I watched some of the questioning by the panel and just cringed.

Where the heck did they find him???

Dread Pirate Roberts

(1,896 posts)
5. He did stay at a Holiday Inn Express however.
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 05:41 PM
Dec 2017

He would have been better advised to say he watched a requisite number of Law & Order episodes.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
6. Gee Matt, ya think?
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 06:00 PM
Dec 2017

A "distraction" who was angling for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench, where who know what havoc he would have wrought. But that was the whole idea, wasn't it?

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
7. "....counting on senators to reject his bad judicial picks. "
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 06:06 PM
Dec 2017

Well, ok then. we'll see what we can to help.

onethatcares

(16,178 posts)
8. reject them???
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 06:10 PM
Dec 2017

hell, they'd accept them with open arms and non normal confirmation hearings if they could.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump Judicial Nominee Dr...