Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

blondebanshee

(353 posts) Fri Dec 15, 2017, 05:23 PM Dec 2017

TRUMP GOLF COUNT: 79* Cost to Taxpayers:

At least $90,249,561

Fun site

http://trumpgolfcount.com/

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

TRUMP GOLF COUNT: 79* Cost to Taxpayers: (Original Post) blondebanshee Dec 2017 OP

It would be a bargain if we paid him to spend more time golfing. n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2017 #1

He needs to spend less time golfing ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #2

republicans owe Americans a big fat reimbursement check Achilleaze Dec 2017 #3

Thanks for this! smirkymonkey Dec 2017 #4

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)

1. It would be a bargain if we paid him to spend more time golfing. n/t

Reply to blondebanshee (Original post)

Fri Dec 15, 2017, 05:24 PM

Dec 2017

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)

2. He needs to spend less time golfing

Reply to blondebanshee (Original post)

Fri Dec 15, 2017, 05:26 PM

Dec 2017

And more time eating fast food and ice cream!

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)

3. republicans owe Americans a big fat reimbursement check

Reply to blondebanshee (Original post)

Fri Dec 15, 2017, 05:31 PM

Dec 2017

republican squandering our hard-earned tax dollars on golden, gourmet goodies for Comrade Casino, their deceitful & treasonous republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief. The blubbering clown claims he's a billionaire, so he can squander his own freaking millions on this goof-off golf horseshit.

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)

4. Thanks for this!

Reply to blondebanshee (Original post)

Fri Dec 15, 2017, 06:46 PM

Dec 2017

Very handy to have at one's fingertips for the holiday mash-ups!

Reply to this discussion