General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeter Jackson: Harvey Weinstein Made Me Blacklist Accusers Ashley Judd and Mira Sorvino
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
From http://time.com/5066394/peter-jackson-harvey-weinstein-interview/
By SAMANTHA COONEY
Updated: December 15, 2017 1:37 PM ET
The Lord of the Rings director Peter Jackson said he suspects Harvey Weinsteins company fed him information to discourage him from working with Ashley Judd and Mira Sorvino, two of the dozens of women who have publicly accused the producer of sexual misconduct this year.
In an interview with New Zealand news website Stuff, Jackson said that he didnt have direct knowledge of the allegations against Weinstein. But he now believes the Weinstein brothers, who originally controlled the rights to The Lord of the Rings series at Miramax, convinced him not to cast Judd and Sorvino.
I recall Miramax telling us they were a nightmare to work with and we should avoid them at all costs. This was probably in 1998, Jackson said. At the time, we had no reason to question what these guys were telling us but in hindsight, I realise that this was very likely the Miramax smear campaign in full swing I now suspect we were fed false information about both of these talented women and as a direct result their names were removed from our casting list.
A Weinstein spokesman denied he had any influence over the casting for the films. Mr. Weinstein has nothing but the utmost respect for Peter Jackson. However, as Mr. Jackson will probably remember, because Disney would not finance the Lord of the Rings, Miramax lost the project and all casting was done by New Line, the statement said.
...
More at link.
Bradshaw3
(7,522 posts)And then after a trial, he goes to jail.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,357 posts)more to the story, no matter the industry. Even "good" men can follow the path of least resistance when it comes to believing what toxic men tell them.
Glorfindel
(9,730 posts)Each of them is a class act, and being disparaged by Harvey Weinstein is a badge of honor, indicating that they rejected his repulsive advances. It's just a shame that we have been deprived of the pleasure of seeing them in more movies. Many thanks to Peter Jackson for his honesty and courage.
RobinA
(9,894 posts)He apparently didn't have the courage back then when it counted.
Glorfindel
(9,730 posts)Galadriel, Arwen Evenstar, Eowen, Tauriel, and Ann Darrow in "King Kong." I can't see Mira Sorvino or Ashley Judd applying for or being cast in any of those roles. Rosie Cotton and the terrifying harridan who screams, "Torry Kong!" are the only other two who come to mind.
cab67
(2,993 posts)...Mira Sorvino would have made a good Arwen.
Orrex
(63,216 posts)But Cate Blanchett nailed that role.
Orrex
(63,216 posts)For me, she's one of those "could read the phone book and I'd still watch" kind of people.
cab67
(2,993 posts)It sounds like Jackson was unaware of the misconduct allegations against Weinstein. I've been in this situation myself; I've been told unpleasant things about colleagues (male and female) from people I had no reason do doubt, only later to learn there were ulterior motives behind it.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Women whose careers were sidelined by a creep.
Glorfindel
(9,730 posts)"proud possessors of vaginas." Damned if you do, damned if you don't, but I'll err on the side of good manners, thank you very much.
RandomAccess
(5,210 posts)And not just by Harvey Weinstein.
Either thru being blacklisted like Sorvino and Judd, or by taking themselves out of the business entirely, like so many women we'll never know much about. When the Weinstein scandal broke, Tippi Hedrin ("The Birds" ) tweeted that she left the business when Hitchcock threatened her when she wouldn't comply with his inappropriate behavior. I always wondered about HER. How many other women have we lost the talents of this way?
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)She wrote about this in a book, I believe. I've heard her talk about it in interviews. I was shocked to find out that old, fat Hitchcock was a perv, and very vindictive.
She said that even later, after it was all over, she rec'd a "gift" from him....when she opened it, it was a doll with the head cut off. Just bizarre stuff like that. He had told her he'd ruin her career.
Makes me wonder if Grace Kelly was more cooperative? Or the others he hired for his films?
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Wish there were more like him. He didn't have to come out and reveal this. He's a stand-up guy.
33taw
(2,444 posts)At his back on this issue.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)No reason not to believe it. He trusted whoever told him that.
That sort of info is passed along a lot "in the biz," I suspect.
I don't blame him at all. There's no reason, unless you suspect it's a lie, to go investigate on your own with different sources. I'm sure he was already working long hours, as were his assistants. It's not like they were big stars. Easy just to choose someone else.
BannonsLiver
(16,397 posts)He was told they were difficult to work with. Jackson probably never knew they real reason Weinstein was bad mouthing them. Most people when told someone is difficult to work with dont seek to find out for themselves.
Im of the belief that better late than never applies to situations like this and those who finally get it should be welcomed, not shit on.