Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stuart G

(38,436 posts)
Thu Dec 14, 2017, 11:20 PM Dec 2017

What Collins wants is not in the new spending bill ..Talking Points Memo:

According to the article link below, what Collins wanted is not in this new spending bill. This is a temporary spending bill meant to keep the government open.

____________________________________________________________________________________

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/republicans-race-again-to-avoid-a-government-shutdown

As the outline of that spending deal emerges, GOP lawmakers confirmed to TPM that it will include five years of funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), which expired at the end of September, but will not include two policies to stabilize the health insurance market that Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) demanded in exchange for voting to repeal the individual mandate in the Republican tax bill.

Collins told TPM on Thursday that if the House sends over a funding bill without her two demands—one provision restoring the cost-sharing reduction payments to insurance companies that President Trump defunded earlier this year, and another creating a multi-billion dollar reinsurance program to stabilize the individual market—the Senate could simply vote to insert them and kick the bill back to the House.

Asked what she plans to do if the House strips them out, and whether she would vote for the tax bill without knowing the fate of the provisions, Collins appeared irritated.

“You know, I’m really tired of the cynicism of the press,” she told TPM with a tight smile. “Why don’t we wait and see what happens?”

The House’s influential far-right Freedom Caucus has all along been staunchly opposed to Collins’ proposals, deriding them as corporate welfare and a “bailout” for health insurance companies. Even without those proposals included, Freedom Caucus Chair Mark Meadows (R-NC) told TPM he anticipates a “block of perhaps no’s” on the spending bill, but thinks it can still pass. Whether a deal that heavily favors military spending over all else can pass the upper chamber, however, is another story.__________________________________
(article continues at link)

_____________________________________________________________________________________

It looks like this is the temporary bill to keep the government going, NOT the TAX BILL. I was not sure in the original post, and I have changed it, as I reread it a few times.. sorry...to all who read it originally...

......I made a mistake........



2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Collins wants is not in the new spending bill ..Talking Points Memo: (Original Post) Stuart G Dec 2017 OP
What I expected: no_hypocrisy Dec 2017 #1
Sucker Achilleaze Dec 2017 #2

no_hypocrisy

(46,128 posts)
1. What I expected:
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 07:29 AM
Dec 2017

Mitch would show Collins a printed version of the bill, open it to the page and paragraph that had her demands to show her, . . . . and then have the Senate vote on a version without it. The Bait-and-Switch tactic.

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
2. Sucker
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 07:32 AM
Dec 2017

Last edited Fri Dec 15, 2017, 08:38 AM - Edit history (1)

What kind of fool would trust Comrade Casino* and his republican comrades? A damn fool.

* aka republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What Collins wants is not...