Fox News has 10k Strzok-Page texts when DOJ only gave Congress 375

[L. Coyote]

Watch how this plays out.
Can you express political opinions and work for the government at the same time?
Do you have a right to private email if you work for the government?
Will Republiscams use this to discredit Robert Mueller?

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

[CincyDem]

1. Rosenstein's response: We released almost 400...have no idea why Fox might claim 10,000.

Can't remember the exact words but implied "you can't believe everything you hear on the news"...and Jefferies made some comment to the Chair about needing an investigation into leaks...in a sarcastic "I know this will never fly" kind of way.

[riversedge]

2. In reading the nytimes story--it reminds me of the drip drip drip of the Hillary and DNC Pedesta

emails. Of course, that was the purpose!!. And the nytimes puts a titillating Clinton headline to the story.

And Fox has more--so the drip drip will continue.

[ffr]

3. Gee, there's a news flash. People in Gov have opinions they share in texts

What a scandal! Oh my goodness, they even go back and forth in their likes and dislikes of the then candidates. What a surprise!!

Oh, but wait, F.B.I. regulations allow agents to express opinions “as an individual privately and publicly on political subjects and candidates.” - NYT



And this is what Rumptard is hitching his wagon to? What a buffoon!

[L. Coyote]

4. When you got nothing, time to fabricate and lie.

The Trump/Russia bots are having a Mueller hate fest on Twitter.
Geee, I wonder why?