Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(135,843 posts)
Tue Dec 12, 2017, 05:21 PM Dec 2017

Exclusive: Grassley urges Trump to reconsider controversial judicial picks

Washington (CNN)Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley issued a rare rebuke Tuesday of two of President Donald Trump's most controversial judicial nominees, urging the White House to rethink the picks.

Grassley told CNN that he is advising the White House to "reconsider" the nomination of Jeff Mateer, who was selected to become a federal judge in Texas. He said the White House "should not proceed" on the nomination of Brett Talley, whom Trump picked to become a federal judge in Alabama.

"I've advised the White House they ought to reconsider," Grassley said as he left a Judiciary Committee hearing. "I would advise the White House not to proceed."

Grassley's comments amount to an unusual brake on Trump's bid to fill the judiciary with young conservative voices. The Senate has moved at an unprecedented pace this year to seat federal judges but controversy has surrounded the Mateer and Talley nominations.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/12/politics/trump-judicial-picks/index.html
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Exclusive: Grassley urges Trump to reconsider controversial judicial picks (Original Post) spanone Dec 2017 OP
geez stupid, just get your fellow repubs to vote NO on them. nt msongs Dec 2017 #1
imagine how incompetent these appointees have to be if they made grassley shake his head? spanone Dec 2017 #3
These judges were rated as unqualified by the ABA Gothmog Dec 2017 #2
Is the one with no experience among those malaise Dec 2017 #4
Will Grassley vote against them? Renew Deal Dec 2017 #5
Fuck Chuck's bogus "good Retrumplican" bullshit routine maxrandb Dec 2017 #6
Talley has already been approved by Grassley's committee gratuitous Dec 2017 #7

maxrandb

(15,331 posts)
6. Fuck Chuck's bogus "good Retrumplican" bullshit routine
Tue Dec 12, 2017, 07:29 PM
Dec 2017

Here's the only response to ANYONE with an "R" after their name.

"Go fuck yourself sideways with a First Edition hard cover copy of Atlas Shrugged you worthless piece of amphibian Shit"!!

From Senator to Dogcatcher... that's the only response that currently makes sense in response to ANY Retrumplican

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
7. Talley has already been approved by Grassley's committee
Tue Dec 12, 2017, 07:34 PM
Dec 2017

The next step for Talley's nomination for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench is a vote of the full Senate. I wonder why Grassley didn't stop Talley's nomination in the committee he serves as chairman? Or has he suddenly decided that every presidential nomination for the judiciary deserves to be voted on by the full Senate? That hasn't always been his position.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Exclusive: Grassley urges...