Trump is playing us with Gillibrand tweet

[jodymarie aimee]

Dems have a beef with Gillibrand and Schumer for forcing Franken out. So what does Trump do today...attacks Gillibrand. So we are supposed to flip now and defend her....Aren't DEMs smart enough to see he is playing us...more chaos and division...

[LexVegas]

1. Are you for real?

[samnsara]

2. im just responding to him as if he made those remarks about ANY woman..

..and called into question the SMALL SIZE of his 'contribution'..

[spanone]

3. You give him too much credit. I disagree with them on Franken, but i want them to kick trump's ass

[Atman]

12. Totally agree.

Trump isn't capable of that kind of chess, as light-weight as it is -- certainly no Obama 5 dimensional player. He got smacked down by Gillibrand, so he simply could not stop his school yard bully self from responded. There is nothing calculated about it, just typical Trump.

[Denzil_DC]

4. I suspect people put more thought into interpreting Trump's tweets

than he does into churning them out.

[Trust Buster]

5. Who cares ? The fool just claimed that Gillibrand was willing to trade sexual favors in return for

Campaign contributions. We are a country of laws. Gillibrand should sue for defamation. Conspiracy theories will achieve nothing.

[brooklynite]

6. OR...Gillibrand called for him to step down and he lashed out like he always does...

...With the exception of small pockets of online bloggers, nobody is "having a beef with Gillibrand and Schumer"

[hlthe2b]

7. I have no problem believing Gillibrand made a big mistake on Franken, while supporting her fully on

this. I give her props for her response.

I am not (nor are most of us) RW simpletons who cannot hold complex beliefs and thought processes. I can support her on this all the while I want to send a message to her that she made a big mistake in how she dealt with Franken.

[GoCubsGo]

11. Exactly right.

I'm not thrilled with her for leading the charge to throw Franken under the bus. But, I would be mad as hell with her if wasn't taking on the pervert who currently occupies the White house. Good for her for going good and hard at him. I hope others will join her, including republicans.

[ucrdem]

8. Maybe it would have been better to go after Moore?

I guess she'll get around to him after he's elected.

[Renew Deal]

9. You figured it out

[ecstatic]

10. And defending her is the appropriate response. We're "family," he's not

He doesn't get to hint that she's a whore with my approval. Fuck that!

[DemocratSinceBirth]

13. Trump implied Kirsten Gillibrand would have sex with him for money and we are to assume what ?

Donald J. Trump?Verified account
@realDonaldTrump
Follow Follow @realDonaldTrump
More
Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!
5:03 AM - 12 Dec 2017

[Freethinker65]

14. Nope. Trump just attacked all women that speak up. Going to be fun for SHS to spin it