Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For anyone keeping score. (Original Post) DearAbby Jul 2012 OP
You fail to mention SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #1
Did you hurt yourself trying to miss the point? morningfog Jul 2012 #2
Lol! sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #3
The OP picture speaks for itself. A hundred posts would not say it any clearer. freshwest Jul 2012 #5
Except the OP isn't true NT Trunk Monkey Jul 2012 #13
How about the other 49 states?? Angry Dragon Jul 2012 #52
Some require it some don't Trunk Monkey Jul 2012 #55
Um. no Orrex Jul 2012 #61
Now we're debating semantics but.... Trunk Monkey Jul 2012 #64
So you were more interested in hojacking the thread than in discussing the point? Orrex Jul 2012 #65
Not at all Trunk Monkey Jul 2012 #66
And not nearly as regulated as they should be Orrex Jul 2012 #67
Naw, that sort of injury is purely mental... No worries there Scootaloo Jul 2012 #15
Didn't miss the point at all SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #27
So, how about if the OP identified two constitutional rights... bhikkhu Jul 2012 #59
Master of the duck and weave - or... lame54 Jul 2012 #48
they are so brainwashed by the NRA Skittles Jul 2012 #51
You fail to mention... madinmaryland Jul 2012 #8
Sorry SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #28
Whifffffff......... lastlib Jul 2012 #50
My idea and/or understanding of a gun nut FarPoint Jul 2012 #53
To me a gun nut is someone who has bought into the whole sub-culture Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2012 #58
I can see that .... FarPoint Jul 2012 #60
That oversimplifies it. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2012 #63
Who did you trip over to tell us that? DainBramaged Jul 2012 #19
Major failsauce and I applaud everyone in this thread Rex Jul 2012 #39
And what is it? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #42
Major fail. Rex Jul 2012 #45
Swing, and a miss, Strike Three! lastlib Jul 2012 #56
Nah, just can't dumb myself down enough to reach you guys n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #57
Give yourself some credit.... MrMickeysMom Jul 2012 #62
Why did you capitalize constitutional? Rex Jul 2012 #29
What state mandates a waiting period for a contraceptive implant? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #30
Which state would you be talking about Rex Jul 2012 #33
I made my assumption regarding abortion SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #35
Why is what? Your post assumed it was about abortion and I think you are Rex Jul 2012 #36
What you just posted makes absolutely no sense SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #37
Of course to you that would be true. Rex Jul 2012 #38
It was obviously true to you too, since you edited the post to make more sense n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #43
Wrong, nice assumption Rex Jul 2012 #44
Good thing I don't measure my self-worth SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #46
Of course you don't. Rex Jul 2012 #47
Here, let's try to make his easy... SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #41
Maybe we should have abortion shows. nt rrneck Jul 2012 #4
LIke Rush demanding Fluke provide him free sex acts online? freshwest Jul 2012 #6
This needs to go viral! Thanks for posting it. freshwest Jul 2012 #7
And the RW extremists want to keep it that way. baldguy Jul 2012 #9
Not trying to be argumentative here but... Fridays Child Jul 2012 #10
State legislatures offered 1000 bills across the nation Tsiyu Jul 2012 #14
In washington state we have no abortion requirements. To buy at a WAC gun show you need AtheistCrusader Jul 2012 #23
The difference being that the gun show purchase doesn't jp11 Jul 2012 #11
This is just another example of... tex-wyo-dem Jul 2012 #12
Incidentally... Scootaloo Jul 2012 #16
Scootaloo, I guess you're referring to this person... freshwest Jul 2012 #18
One of a few Scootaloo Jul 2012 #20
Indeed, Scootaloo. Chorophyll Jul 2012 #54
I would pay to watch you debate these issues with any fundy gun nut. DCKit Jul 2012 #17
Mostly true krispos42 Jul 2012 #21
Most sellers DainBramaged Jul 2012 #22
Theft. Fraud. Straw purchases. Smuggling. Illicit manufacture. AtheistCrusader Jul 2012 #24
Excellent. blue neen Jul 2012 #25
You are correct - we need to loosen the restrictions on abortion. Good point. nt hack89 Jul 2012 #26
Excellent post DearAbby malaise Jul 2012 #31
"Men" like this guy Aerows Jul 2012 #32
Goes to show what our priorities are in this country... YoungDemCA Jul 2012 #34
Yes. Profits over people. freshwest Jul 2012 #40
Yup, 'personal freedoms' at work ... Myrina Jul 2012 #49

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
1. You fail to mention
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 12:17 AM
Jul 2012

That owning a gun is as much a Constitutional right as is abortion and that only private sellers can sell guns at shows without the background check and waiting period.

 

Trunk Monkey

(950 posts)
13. Except the OP isn't true NT
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 01:28 AM
Jul 2012
Before a gun show vendor transfers or attempts to transfer a firearm, he or she shall require that a background check, in accordance with the national instant criminal background check system, be conducted of the prospective transferee, and obtain approval of the transfer from the Colorado Bureau of Investigation through a licensed gun dealer.

It is also unlawful to transfer a firearm if any part of the transaction takes place at a gun show, unless a licensed dealer first obtains a background check on the prospective transferee. This does not apply to firearms defined as antiques, curios or relics under federal law.

Taken straight out of the Colorado Revised Statutes

Orrex

(63,220 posts)
61. Um. no
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 11:33 PM
Jul 2012

It refers to "a gun show." It doesn't say "at all gun shows everywhere forever and ever amen."

It's untrue if and only if no gun show exists wherein one can purchase a gun with cash and without a background check.


Nice attempt at a deflection, but...




On second thought, it was a pretty lame attempt.

 

Trunk Monkey

(950 posts)
64. Now we're debating semantics but....
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 06:22 AM
Jul 2012

The OP said anyone can buy a gun at a gun show w/out an ID

However no one in Colorado can so the OP is untrue

 

Trunk Monkey

(950 posts)
66. Not at all
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 10:28 AM
Jul 2012

IMO if the point is untrue there is no point to discuss.

I think guns are a little more regulated than you think they are.

Orrex

(63,220 posts)
67. And not nearly as regulated as they should be
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 02:44 PM
Jul 2012

The point is "untrue" only if you cling to a literal and restrictive definition of one word in the OP. Do you really suppose that the OP was suggesting that literally "anyone" can get a gun at a gun show? Do you actually believe that a reasonable reader would construe that literally "anyone" was meant?

You're engaging in the most tritely disingenuous tactic of avoiding an actual discussion: find one word whose usage you can complain about, and pretend that you've invalidated the entire discussion. It's a hoary internet tactic, never persuasive to anyone actually interested in a dialogue.

You can pretend that there's no point to discuss, but that's rhetorically identical to jamming your fingers in your ears and closing your eyes.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
27. Didn't miss the point at all
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 03:55 PM
Jul 2012

I just appreciate intellectual honesty, and the graphic, while effective at making the point, is intellectually dishonest.

Reproductive choice and gun ownership are both Constitutional rights - why not acknowledge that?

bhikkhu

(10,720 posts)
59. So, how about if the OP identified two constitutional rights...
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 10:11 PM
Jul 2012

and then highlighted the disparity between the regulations that apply to them. Would that be better?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
28. Sorry
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 03:56 PM
Jul 2012

I didn't realize that acknowledging that gun ownership is a Constitutional right equated to being a gun nut.

FarPoint

(12,428 posts)
53. My idea and/or understanding of a gun nut
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 08:08 PM
Jul 2012

is a male who sexualized the weapon, a gun, for ones intimate body part. Firing the weapon represents intimacy via the weapon. Hitting the target is said to represent orgasm. This transference could explain why guns are so very territorial....almost sacred to many.

Thus the term gun nut came into being..........

That is what I was told.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
58. To me a gun nut is someone who has bought into the whole sub-culture
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 10:02 PM
Jul 2012

It's like assuming owning a Harley means you HAVE to get the appropriate tattoos, the outfit, grow a beard and drink Bud and Jack Daniels.

A gun nut is someone who's bought the stereotype and they've modelled their whole identity around something they own.

They feel if you take away that something you are taking away their reason for being.

Bikers talk about their bikes the way gun nuts talk about their guns. It's all about freedom. At least with bikers it's the freedom of the open road. With gun nuts it's the freedom to turn their home into an anti-government bunker/ammo dump preparing for that glorious day when they let "THEM" know they fucked with the wrong guy.

FarPoint

(12,428 posts)
60. I can see that ....
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 11:13 PM
Jul 2012

Phallic Symbols.... that's what we are identifying. I had to go look it up. Yeap...phallic symbols.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
63. That oversimplifies it.
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 11:52 PM
Jul 2012

I'm talking about the distinction between being a fan, and a fanatic.

It's the difference between liking Star Trek and believing you are a Klingon.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
29. Why did you capitalize constitutional?
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 03:56 PM
Jul 2012

And why do you assume the lady in the picture wants an abortion? Maybe she is there to get a contraceptive implant.

Very revealing about yourself...

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
35. I made my assumption regarding abortion
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 04:03 PM
Jul 2012

Based on the text in the picture that referenced waiting periods. You questioned why I assumed the woman was there for an abortion, and I gave you my answer.

I notice that other posters on this thread also assumed and referenced abortion with regards to this picture, but you only come after me...why is that?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
36. Why is what? Your post assumed it was about abortion and I think you are
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 04:07 PM
Jul 2012

incorrect. Is that too hard to understand?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
44. Wrong, nice assumption
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 04:19 PM
Jul 2012

but that was a hit and miss. I love the fact that people are telling you how badly you failed in this thread. It is very deserving.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
46. Good thing I don't measure my self-worth
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 04:21 PM
Jul 2012

Based on the (wrong) assumptions of anonymous posters on a discussion board.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
41. Here, let's try to make his easy...
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 04:14 PM
Jul 2012
And why do you assume the lady in the picture wants an abortion?


Because the text references waiting periods.

Maybe she is there to get a contraceptive implant.


Are there states that mandate waiting periods for implants? I know some states mandate waiting periods for abortions, but I know of none that do so for implants, so I assumed the picture and text referred to abortions.

Very revealing about yourself...


How is it any more revealing about me than it is about any of the other posters on this thread that also assumed this referred to abortion? And why are you making assumptions about me and not the others that came to the same conclusion I did?

My guess is that you didn't do so because you agree with their stance on gun ownership but disagree with mine.

Of course, I could be wrong.

Fridays Child

(23,998 posts)
10. Not trying to be argumentative here but...
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 12:56 AM
Jul 2012

...are pre-abortion counseling, testing, and waiting periods required in every state? Of course, if they're required in even one state the right to reproductive freedom is limited and endangered.

I also wonder whether there are any states that place restrictions on firearms purchases. I haven't really paid attention to this debate, in the past. In any case, I believe that the Second Amendment is silent on the issue of regulating firearms ownership.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
14. State legislatures offered 1000 bills across the nation
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 01:52 AM
Jul 2012

this past year attempting to ( or succeeding in ) taking away women's right to privacy and to make their own reproductive choices.

Many of those state bills were passed into law.

The only state laws affecting gun ownership that I've read about are those making it perfectly legal to carry your pistol into Chuckie Cheese, church or the local State Park.

"Pro-Life" and all that trumps it, Baby.....

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
23. In washington state we have no abortion requirements. To buy at a WAC gun show you need
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 03:10 AM
Jul 2012

to be a member, and have a background check, or they escort you to the door for so much as picking up a gun to look at it.

(Of course, you can buy whatever you want from a private seller in the newspaper though)

jp11

(2,104 posts)
11. The difference being that the gun show purchase doesn't
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 12:59 AM
Jul 2012

mean you get a new gun that is even safe to fire. Anyone can sell any gun to anyone as a private seller and there is nothing that verifies the gun is safe, working, not stolen etc.

The comparison would be more accurate to compare the legal/safe way of getting an abortion in some states requiring counseling, unnecessary medical tests, or waiting periods to legal purchases of guns through retailers where licenses/permits, waiting periods etc are in force.

Using the the private seller who is free from responsibility of making sure the purchaser CAN legally buy the gun would be on par with some underground abortion services by unlicensed practitioners in unsanitary locations that could put the woman's life in danger. In addition the purchaser would be breaking the law if they were not legally able to purchase/own the same gun from a retailer because while they can buy the gun at a gun show from a private seller it is illegal for them to do so absent the proper licensing.

But that isn't the point of the post or graphic so who cares about the accuracy right?

tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
12. This is just another example of...
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 01:14 AM
Jul 2012

Your typical off-the-charts RW hypocrisy. Their whole argument for limiting reproductive rights is "pro-life"...not killing innocent lives, yet when it comes to guns, the thought that one gun in the hands of the wrong person can end multiple innocent lives within seconds doesn't register at all.

Of course this is in concert with another stunning display of RW hypocritical though process: As soon as the fetus leaves the womb, you are on your own (demonstrated by their lack of support for universal healthcare).

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
18. Scootaloo, I guess you're referring to this person...
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 02:56 AM
Jul 2012


George Richard Tiller

Born August 8, 1941
Died May 31, 2009
Cause of death Gunshot wound

 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
17. I would pay to watch you debate these issues with any fundy gun nut.
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 02:41 AM
Jul 2012

Disclaimer: I own a 12 gauge shotgun and a BB gun. I don't sleep with either of them.

They're just "there".

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
21. Mostly true
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 03:00 AM
Jul 2012

"gun show" is misleading... whether a background check is performed depends on who the seller is, not where the sale takes place. Most sellers at gun shows are federally licensed dealers, and must perform a background check regardless of geographic location.

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
22. Most sellers
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 03:06 AM
Jul 2012

therein lies the problem


Can anyone tell me how come there are so many guns in the hands of criminals??


anyone???

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
24. Theft. Fraud. Straw purchases. Smuggling. Illicit manufacture.
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 03:11 AM
Jul 2012

It can also be in the hands of someone who was formerly law abiding, but committed a crime.


Why do you ask?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
32. "Men" like this guy
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 04:00 PM
Jul 2012

It's macho bullshit.

Grandmothers have to carry a pistol in their purses because "men" seem to think a pistol makes them fertile and desirable.

I could call out some DU members that are Gungeon denizens that make me feel less safe in the world. Your dick is not threatened if it takes 20 days to get a permit for an ar-15. If your dick is threatened by that, then your dick is a shriveled, tiny piece of bacon that no one gives a crap about blowing off.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For anyone keeping score.