Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

napkinz

(17,199 posts)
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 06:01 PM Jul 2012

"We have no collective will in this country to make sure such a day never happens again." Agree?

After Aurora, Michael Tomasky on the Country the NRA Wants to See

by Michael Tomasky
July 21, 2012

Don’t believe those who say we will prevent horrific shootings. This is the America we live in now.

If there’s one thing I hate hearing at times like this, it’s that violin-music language about how we must work to ensure that something like the Aurora shooting “never happens again.” I can understand why it makes people feel better in some way to say it. But really. Nonsense. We have no collective will in this country to make sure such a day never happens again. In fact, if anything, we are headed for a day when 20 percent of the people in a movie theater are armed themselves, and we have a good old shoot ’em up that would’ve made John Ford’s head spin but will make the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre’s heart soar like an eagle.

I accept that guns have been a part of American life since the beginning—the first individual mandate after all, as liberals didn’t mind saying when seeking to defend the health-care law. I can understand (barely, but I can) how a person can love guns as I love guitars, which, if I had the money, I’d collect avidly.

But please. The idea that honest efforts to keep guns out of the hands of potential killers and mentally unstable people poses any rational threat to my friends or America’s hunters and collectors is completely preposterous. This is such a con. Rock-ribbed conservatives usually don’t show a great deal of sympathy for our country’s mentally ill, when the question involves social spending on their behalf; but by God try to deny them to right to bear arms, and watch how quickly and feverishly the right wing rallies to their side, linking arms as if the famous “slippery slope” would lead inevitably from the mentally ill to law-abiding citizens. (Technically, the mentally disturbed can’t buy guns, but as a practical matter, existing proscriptions are easily circumvented, as we learned with Jared Lee Loughner in Arizona).

It is of course LaPierre’s National Rifle Association that has hyped this slippery slope and made it so omnipresent in the minds of its members. Give him credit: Twenty or so years ago, the NRA was losing ground. At the time, when some nut shot up a post office or a McDonald’s, we actually had the conversations about gun laws we no longer bother with, and laws were passed like the 1994 assault weapons ban. Then the NRA got to work on three fronts. First, no accommodation or compromise. Second, it built an enviable track record of defeating incumbents who opposed it. And third, it developed an expert vocabulary for stoking gun-owners’ anxieties about liberals’ desire to take their guns, as we’ve seen recently in the Fast and Furious “controversy,” which gained traction on the right pretty much entirely because the NRA persuaded its partisans that the whole program was a stalking horse for a dark conspiracy to rid America of firearms.

Read more: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/07/21/after-aurora-michael-tomasky-on-the-country-the-nra-wants-to-see.html




9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"We have no collective will in this country to make sure such a day never happens again." Agree? (Original Post) napkinz Jul 2012 OP
No amount of regulations would have stopped James Holmes, he'd still have been able to buy the guns GarroHorus Jul 2012 #1
Wow. Now you have resorted to screaming. Kingofalldems Jul 2012 #9
plenty of so-called Democrats fall for NRA propaganda Skittles Jul 2012 #2
I blame the right for their lack of support for quality health care and a well-regulated militia. LonePirate Jul 2012 #3
The answer is so simple and so progressive pipoman Jul 2012 #4
One thing I know for sure... Speck Tater Jul 2012 #6
The human condition these days is... Speck Tater Jul 2012 #5
I keep thinking of a line from a Lennon song napkinz Jul 2012 #7
I think most people want to stop these things Marrah_G Jul 2012 #8
 

GarroHorus

(1,055 posts)
1. No amount of regulations would have stopped James Holmes, he'd still have been able to buy the guns
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 06:04 PM
Jul 2012

He'd also have been able to do it 100% legally.

Short of banning guns, you will NEVER stop it. NEVER.

And you will NEVER be able to ban guns when gun ownership is an enumerated right under the constitution.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
4. The answer is so simple and so progressive
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 06:31 PM
Jul 2012

it is shocking how many ignore it..

Mental health services in this country are not available until after someone commits a criminal act. Health care is broken and the results of this are far reaching.

 

Speck Tater

(10,618 posts)
5. The human condition these days is...
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 06:47 PM
Jul 2012

long periods of apathy punctuated by brief, 10-minute episodes of outrage, followed immediately by a return to apathy. Nothing will get done because so few people even give a damn.

napkinz

(17,199 posts)
7. I keep thinking of a line from a Lennon song
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 06:51 PM
Jul 2012

"I tell them there are no problems, only solutions."

Now is that just a "cool-sounding" line from a song, or does it really mean something?









Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
8. I think most people want to stop these things
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 06:51 PM
Jul 2012

I think they have differing opinion as to how to go about that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"We have no collecti...