General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRemember when Bush Jr. tried to massage Merkel's neck and she jumped?
He was just goofing, as always. But today it could be considered harassment.
JI7
(89,252 posts)level of power.
question everything
(47,488 posts)I think, or just read someplace, that some men try to do this to female co-workers..
JI7
(89,252 posts)but they really should NOT do it in the first place .
Skittles
(153,169 posts)JI7
(89,252 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)JI7
(89,252 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)I cringed when I saw it because a lot of gals can relate to that unwanted bullshit
delisen
(6,044 posts)wer a custom in the other man's country-lil crystal globe rubbing when present for an all-male sword dance in Saudi Arabia.
yortsed snacilbuper
(7,939 posts)Cicada
(4,533 posts)Walmart went broke in Germany because they made greeters look at customers coming in and talk to them. The Germans told them that creeped Germans out but Walmart insisted. All the way to the closing of all their stores.
question everything
(47,488 posts)greyl
(22,990 posts)Unfortunately, this form of corporate boosterism didnt go over particularly well with the Germans. Maybe they found it embarrassing or silly; maybe they found it too regimented. Or maybe they found this oddly aggressive, mindless and exuberant exercise in group-think too reminiscent of other rallies....like one that occurred in Nuremberg several decades earlier.
Another issue was the smiling. Walmart requires its checkout people to flash smiles at customers after bagging their purchases. Plastic bags, plastic junk, plastic smiles. But because the German people dont usually smile at total strangers, the spectacle of Walmart employees grinning like jackasses not only didnt impress consumers, it unnerved them.
The third was the ethics problem. Back in 1997, Walmart not only required employees to spy on fellow workers (and report any misconduct), but prohibited sexual intimacy among its employees. Apparently, while the folks running the Bentonville, Arkansas-based company had no problem with screwing the environment, they couldnt abide employees doing it to each other (alas, a German court struck down Walmarts ethics code in 2005).
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-macaray/why-did-walmart-leave-ger_b_940542.html
DFW
(54,412 posts)A colleague in northern Germany has a female employee who is a former gymnast and messed up her body something fierce after demanding more of it than it could give. When she heard that I knew something of back massage (after decades of my wife instructing me where and what), she practically demands a brief session from me when I'm up there for work. If I have a few minutes free, I massage her back right there at her desk, and no one thinks anything of it.
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)question everything
(47,488 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)bobbieinok
(12,858 posts)A man just doesn't do that to a woman out of the blue! She was head of state of one of our closest allies!!
Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)As world leaders especially - it looked as if he thought he could touch her regardless of how she felt about it - he took a liberty, both as a man and fellow world leader. He would not have done that to a male world leader but because she is female, he thought he could and it would be accepted.
Even if he thought nothing of it - which is the case of some men who cross the line - it was still taking a liberty. It was still assuming he had the right to touch her no matter what.
If you think in terms of a power hierarchy (so-called "leader of the free world" v. all the rest) - it's a sign of disrespect and could easily be interpreted as harassment of a world leader seen as less simply because said leader is female. It's still a tough row to hoe for women to be taken seriously as leaders.
Now, people can say I'm blowing it of proportion and taking it too seriously - but that is how women (and POC) are all too often dismissed when they point out words/actions that are offensive.
Not all sexual harassment is a man holding power over a woman who works for or with him - it can also be the perceived power of a man over others in any group setting. And how he uses the power he assumes.
JI7
(89,252 posts)even if it wasn't intentional. it still treats women differently than men and like it's ok to behave in certain ways they wouldn't with men on the same level.
Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)she can be touched in any old way by any old body.
If Bush can take the liberty - then why can't they? - kind of thing.
And how serious can she be if men can grab her that way - kind of thing.
We might like to think we live in a world where such things don't matter or such thinking isn't held by some men, but we don't live in that world.
You know how a man can be friends with their female boss and some behavior is OK when it's not the work environment but said behavior would be crossing a line at work? Same thing here.
And because of the persistent sexism in the world, it matters - it really, really matters.
Demit
(11,238 posts)It was a gesture that says I'm not really taking you seriously.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Some of these allegations are outrageous BS.
question everything
(47,488 posts)It summarizes it perfectly. If he can do it, why can't I - Joe Black - in the office?
And perhaps Jane Doe in the office will be too afraid to say NO.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1016197590
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)Now his Party is doing their best to continue dismantling our government.
Arkansas Granny
(31,519 posts)is that so many excuse it by calling it goofing around or diminishing it other ways.
doc03
(35,351 posts)question everything
(47,488 posts)is a useless exercise.