Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNewly revealed email from Trump transition could be the smoking gun
https://thinkprogress.org/newly-revealed-email-from-trump-transition-could-be-the-smoking-gun-c97c4fcda2b3/?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=5a238bda04d30126539e2eef&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitterA key aide in the Trump transition appeared to write in an email that Trump should seek to ease sanctions on Russia because that country had helped Trump win the election.
The aide, K. T. McFarland, currently the nominee to be the next United States Ambassador to Singapore, wrote on December 29 that sanctions imposed by the Obama administration were undesirable, according to a report by the New York Times. McFarland explained that Trump was seeking to improve relations with Russia which has just thrown the U.S.A. election to him.
Taken on its face, the email appears to describe a quid pro quo transaction where relaxed sanctions were exchanged for Russias help in winning the presidency.
White House lawyers, however, say that the email should not be taken literally. Rather, the lawyers told the New York Times that she meant only that the Democrats were portraying it that way. The paper does not appear fully convinced by this explanation: It is not clear whether Ms. McFarland was saying she believed that the election had in fact been thrown.
(snip)
Overall, the emails obtained by the New York Times show the effort to influence U.S. foreign policy with Russia prior to Obamas inauguration extended far beyond Gen. Michael Flynn.
(end snip)
2 questions - Is this the same group of lawyers that wrote the tweet that implicated the orange hyena in obstruction of justice this morning? and did quid meet quo here?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1129 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Newly revealed email from Trump transition could be the smoking gun (Original Post)
deminks
Dec 2017
OP
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)1. That is going to be an interesting confirmation hearing
assuming McFarland stays the nominee.
dweller
(23,643 posts)2. after the snip,
why does it say "obama's inauguration" in the paragraph following?
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)3. It ... IS ... the smoking gun, M$M will claim this is magic bullet crap but don't believe them
SonofDonald
(2,050 posts)4. "She meant only that the Democrats were portraying it that way"
Just amazing how it can be blamed on the Democrats right off the bat, like that would be the way she would normally describe what happened in an internal communication.
Sure it is.
The dog ate my homework......