Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDonald Trump seems to be quite unfamiliar with the rules of criminal evidence.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
I suggest a hands on, crash course for him.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 858 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Donald Trump seems to be quite unfamiliar with the rules of criminal evidence. (Original Post)
Tommy_Carcetti
Dec 2017
OP
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)1. It worked well for GHWB, though. Prepare for "Kate Steinle" to be the new "Willie Horton."
Butterflylady
(3,553 posts)3. True, but since Lee Atwater has passed on
Stone will give it a try.
Historic NY
(37,454 posts)2. California Evidence Code Summary Trial Guide
light toilet reading for donald
https://www.elexpublishers.com/california-evidence-guide.html
mythology
(9,527 posts)4. Wouldn't it be simpler to list the things he is familiar with?
Much shorter list.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)5. This guy has been in 35,000 lawsuits!
He knows the law.
He is using divisive issues to promote his political agenda and to keep his base together.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)6. And I think he just got a big boost for his agenda
Was it too much for me to expect at least a verdict of involuntary manslaughter? Guy has gun, gun goes off, woman dies in her father's arms, isn't there some culpability there? Especially since his story about "finding" the gun sounds just like pure bullshit?