General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCollins and Murkowski push maniacs' lie that losing health insurance is 'freedom'
Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska are both justifying their votes to give massive tax cuts to corporations and rich people while crippling Obamacare with a repeal of the individual mandate with the lie all Republicans use: Repealing the mandate is just giving their constituents more freedom. That would be the freedom to go without health carebut they don't want anyone to hear that part.
Maybe economist and health policy expert Matthew Fiedler can debunk the myth of "freedom" for them.
The first flaw in this argument is that it assumes individuals bear the full cost of their decisions about whether to obtain insurance coverage; in fact, one persons decision to go without health insurance coverage shifts costs onto other people. Notably, CBO has estimated that the departure of healthy enrollees from the individual market spurred by repeal of the individual mandate will increase individual market premiums by 10 percent, causing some in that market to involuntarily lose coverage and causing those who remain to bear higher costs. In addition, many of those who become uninsured will end up needing health care but not be able to pay for it, imposing costs on other participants in the health care system. [...]
The second flaw in this argument is that it assumes individual decisions about whether to purchase health insurance coverage reflect a fully informed, fully rational weighing of the cost and benefits. In fact, there is strong reason to believe that many individuals, particularly the healthier individuals most affected by the mandate, are likely to undervalue insurance coverage. This likely reflects a variety of well-documented psychological biases, including a tendency to place too much weight on upfront costs of obtaining coverage (including the hassle costs of enrolling) relative to the benefits insurance coverage would provide if the individual got sick and needed care at some point in the future. It is therefore likely that many people who would drop insurance coverage due to repeal of the individual mandate would end up worse off, even solely considering the costs and benefits to the individuals themselves.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/11/29/1719489/-Collins-and-Murkowski-push-maniacs-lie-that-losing-health-insurance-is-freedom
cilla4progress
(24,766 posts)Today. Re-called some on the fence senators, and called my MOC.
Are these senators that stupid, or just beholden to donors?