Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Are_grits_groceries

(17,111 posts)
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 06:23 AM Jul 2012

The length of time taken to notify some families is inexcusable IMHO:

I know they have to leave the bodies in order to process the crime scene.

There are hundreds of law enforcement people on site. Why can't a team be assigned to try to find out the identity of the victims? They would follow protocol and do as little to the crime scene as possible.

I believe a small trained group could do this and let families know what has happened. It wouldn't be a full report by any means, but it would answer the critical question the families have.

They may not be able to identify all, but any family that does't have to wait hours would be worth it.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The length of time taken to notify some families is inexcusable IMHO: (Original Post) Are_grits_groceries Jul 2012 OP
I understand your frustration but dballance Jul 2012 #1
It's not always as simple as it seems it should be. I wear a dog collar with tags when I go out. HopeHoops Jul 2012 #2
I saved my dog-tags, there always in my possession. Has my blood type info. lonestarnot Jul 2012 #3
I don't always carry my "papers" noamnety Jul 2012 #4
 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
1. I understand your frustration but
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:50 AM
Jul 2012

The more people you have enter a crime scene, even if they are pros, the more likely it is to become contaminated. Or that some crucial piece of evidence like a footprint or fibers are to get obscured.

It is impossible for us to not leave fibers and traces of our own DNA behind. And how can you assure they would leave the bodies back in the exact position as before they touched them?

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
2. It's not always as simple as it seems it should be. I wear a dog collar with tags when I go out.
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 11:10 AM
Jul 2012

It has actual dog tags, from PetSmart, with my medical conditions, ICE (in case of emergency) numbers, hospital preference, and a pill case with my emergency pills. My service dog's harness has the same. Both are on leash clips so they can be easily removed. Sure, most people will have a driver's license, but how will that help with tracking down relatives, especially if you're single and live away from your closest kin? I've got contact information in my wallet also, but most people don't keep that sort of thing.

I'd rather find out something happened to a close relative from the police than seeing it on the news. I think they do a pretty good job of it.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
4. I don't always carry my "papers"
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 11:16 AM
Jul 2012

It's pretty common for me to go out for a run or bike ride in workout clothes with no pockets, so I don't have ID on me.

If I go out with my husband and I know I won't be driving, I don't generally bother with a purse. I hate purses. And I try not to take my ID out of my wallet and put it in a pocket because I know I'm absent-minded enough that I might forget to put it back in my wallet for when I really need it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The length of time taken ...