Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Towlie

(5,326 posts)
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 02:50 PM Nov 2017

Victims have to be believed!

I didn't get her name but that's what a woman just said as she was being interviewed by Craig Melvin on MSNBC.

Upon thinking about it, I realized what a logical fallacy that is. It's a tautology! If you know that someone is a victim then that means you believe them, but if you have doubts then you don't know if that person is a victim. What she said is like saying you have to believe those whom you believe.

I'm sure she wouldn't argue that Jamie Phillips, who was caught lying by the Washington Post, should be believed.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

OregonBlue

(7,754 posts)
1. They have to be listened to. Their claims need to be assesed. In the past that didn't happen.
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 02:54 PM
Nov 2017

That was the problem. So we do need that to change. But no, they don't automatically need to be believed, just taken seriously.

MineralMan

(146,318 posts)
2. People who claim to be victims have to be listened to.
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 03:01 PM
Nov 2017

However, they may not be telling the truth, so an examination of the facts is needed.

In politics, such an examination often reveals misstatements or outright lies.

But we should listen to people who claim to be victims and examine their reports carefully to ascertain their truth or non-truth.

rainin

(3,011 posts)
3. I would hate to be a man
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 03:01 PM
Nov 2017

in this "victims have to be believed" environment. Where does this leave an innocent man? All men must be afraid right now wondering if they ever crossed a vindictive woman. This is insanity.

Due process is what we should be standing for.

Plus, can we have some common sense about degrees of harm? I have been butt -brushed and touched while at work (I worked at a bar). I am not harmed for life, nor would I believe any of those men who copped a feel (inappropriately) should be removed from a powerful position. The harm I experienced was minimal.

I was significantly more harmed by Bush's recession!! R's policies kill people!

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
4. I don't give it a second thought.
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 03:20 PM
Nov 2017

"All men must be afraid right now wondering if they ever crossed a vindictive woman..."

I don't give it a second thought. So no, all men must not be afraid.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
7. I don't give that any more thought than I do worrying a woman will say I raped her
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 04:59 PM
Nov 2017

Until there is some rush of false claims, that's not exactly a slippery slope.

The fact that you weren't harmed is a particularly silly argument. You don't get to determine how somebody else is affected by their experiences.

rainin

(3,011 posts)
8. Perhaps it's silly to you.
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 05:15 PM
Nov 2017

But, I will clarify that I wasn't harmed by a butt-brush. I didn't say I wasn't harmed.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
9. for so long women who were raped out of fear that their rapist would beat them
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 06:24 PM
Nov 2017

if they didn't submit never reported the assault. That happened only too often.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Victims have to be believ...