General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHarvard Con law Prof Laurence Tribe: why DT can't make Mulvaney acting head of CFPB.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2017/11/27/sorry-mr-president-you-cant-make-mulvaney-acting-head-of-cfpb/?utm_term=.51954d12f85bYet OLC concluded, unconvincingly, that the 1998 Federal Vacancies Reform Act still leaves the president with the option of installing Mulvaney, even though that statutes own terms explicitly state that it doesnt kick in when another agency-specific statute (here, the subsequently enacted provision of Dodd-Frank) designates an officer or employee to perform the functions and duties of a specified office temporarily in an acting capacity. The OLC analysis treated that language as inconclusive because the Vacancy Reform Act itself, like the CFPB-specific statute, similarly uses mandatory terms, as if interpreting overlapping statutes were a matter of grammatical classification rather than a matter of making sense of an overall statutory scheme.
However muddled, at least its a theory. But CFPBs general counsel, Mary McLeod, in her own Nov. 25 memo, offers a wholly incongruous legal gloss. She doesnt rebut OLCs concession that the vacancy created by Cordrays resignation triggers the agency-specific succession provision of Dodd-Frank but she doesnt exactly accept it, either. Instead, she toys with various definitions of unavailability as she attempts to advance the idea that the directors resignation makes his status something other than unavailable (an alternative status she never quite articulates), winding her way to the notion that Congress may have intended unavailability to mean something temporary, not permanent.
MattP
(3,304 posts)SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)into whether Trump's judicial choices will side with the rule of law, or side with their benefactor.
Wouldn't you just LOVE IT if the Judge ruled against the Orange Shit Cannon? A Trump appointed Judge having the integrity to go against "The Little DICKtator's"wishes?
I'm not holding out much hope, though, especially in the first big test of Trump's DICKtatorial powers. Oh well, it was a nice thought.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)apply to a 'resignation', but rather a temporary indisposition to fulfilling the duties.
It's literally impossible to argue that this verbiage ... is 100% clear-cut, in either direction.
You think the power-hungry Rethugs involved in crafting of the statute didn't slip this poison pill of ambivalence into the text of it for this VERY REASON?
As soon as I read it, I said ... yup ... we'll probably lose this, given the GOP's control over POTUS, Congress, and SCOTUS.
I'm pissed as F*** ... but we're going to lose, yet again.
Thanks Asshole 35%, and the 3rd Party Voters, and most of all, the assholes who STAYED HOME cause 'they're all the same' ...
F*** all y'all.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)I don't have a good feeling about it.
Seems more likely in my mind, whoever wrote that from the OLC ... will be let go tomorrow.
Cause that's the kinda Banana F***ING Republic we now live in.
Someone please ... make the stupid STOP ... I'm begging ... by whatever means necessary.