General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFCC Releases Net Neutrality Killing Order, Hopes You're Too Busy Cooking Turkey To Read It
That said, all six of you not currently driving long distances, buying turkeys and potatoes, or otherwise distracted by holiday preparation can now read a fact sheet provided by the FCC (pdf) explaining what Ajit Pai and his lobbying friends in the telecom industry have planned for you.
Throughout the order, the FCC repeatedly tries to claim that the very real harms we've seen in the broadband sector thanks to a lack of healthy competition are entirely "speculative" and "hypothetical":
"Because of the paucity of concrete evidence of harms to the openness of the Internet, the Title II Order and its proponents have heavily relied on purely speculative threats. We do not believe hypothetical harms, unsupported by empirical data, economic theory, or even recent anecdotes, provide a basis for public-utility regulation of ISPs.428 Indeed, economic theory demonstrates that many of the practices prohibited by the Title II Order can sometimes harm consumers and sometimes benefit consumers; therefore, it is not accurate to presume that all hypothetical effects are harmful."
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20171122/09473038669/fcc-releases-net-neutrality-killing-order-hopes-youre-too-busy-cooking-turkey-to-read-it.shtml
Long read. How can these people do such evil with a straight face? Literally. What the fuck.
triron
(22,003 posts)sumus
(21 posts)It appears that the FCC is going to base their decision to kill Net Neutrality on thousands of bogus comments that came from Russian bots. Link to Washington Post article. Plus the FCC knows it and is standing in the way of an investigation.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/11/22/official-says-hes-been-stymied-by-the-fcc-in-investigation-of-fake-net-neutrality-foes/?utm_term=.aee6068e4b3a
AllyCat
(16,187 posts)We let it happen.
onenote
(42,703 posts)First, far more of those comments are pro-net neutrality than opposed.
Second, the vast majority of them are short, conclusory declarations of support or opposition with no legal or policy analysis -- and thus of no value in making a decision.
Third, there are plenty of bogus filings on both sides of the issue. There are some 200 filings under the name "Donald Trump" that support net neutrality.
Schneiderman should focus his attention and resources on matters where he can make a difference, like investigating the Trump crime syndicate.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)William Seger
(10,778 posts)This calls for massive demonstrations.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Mulvaney, et al.?
That's how.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)They will always follow the lowest common denominator and spread out from there. This is as stupid and unknowing as what happened in Europe in the middle of the thirteenth century. When you try to control or stop something that you don't understand then you will eventually pay the consequences, sometimes quickly, but more likely, just horrendously.
The Black Death, 1348
www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/plague.htm
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)in the accumulation and consolidation of power by a ruling class in an authoritarian state masquerading as a fake democracy.