Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trof

(54,256 posts)
Fri Nov 17, 2017, 06:54 PM Nov 2017

Everything you ever wanted to know about 'Body Armor' (flak jackets)


The new Interceptor body armor was worn by soldiers and Marines in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Army and Marines rushed to get enough body armor into Iraq and Afghanistan by December 2003 for everyone who needed it, as fast as it came off the assembly line. For the Marines, the PASGT flak vest gave way to the new Interceptor body armor-an effective and highly valued piece of gear in the global war on terrorism. Because the Interceptor body armor was in relative short supply, deploying service members got priority at their points of issue. Accounting for two armor plates for each Marine in the ground combat element, the Marines fielded 94,056 plates for active forces and 39,284 for reserve forces.


Interceptor Flak Vest Ballistic Protection
The Interceptor's inter-changeable components give troops the ability to dress to the level of a particular threat.
By itself, the Interceptor vest insulates a soldier from shrapnel and 9-mm pistol rounds. When the protective Small Arms Protective Inserts (SAPI) are added, the system acts as a ballistic barrier to 7.62-mm rifle ammunition. The PASGT flak vest only offered protection against fragmentation.

The Interceptor outer tactical vest consists of a very fine Kevlar weave that will stop 9mm pistol rounds. Webbing on the front and back of the vest permits attaching such equipment as grenades, walkie-talkies and pistols. The Small Arms Protective Insert (SAPI) is made of a boron carbide ceramic with a spectra shield backing, an extremely hard material. It stops, shatters and catches any fragments up to a 7.62 mm round with a muzzle velocity of 2,750 feet per second. It's harder than Kevlar. The four pound high-technology plates cost approximately $350 each to produce, a considerable cost reduction achieved by Army-industry cooperation.

A major upgrade effort to make Interceptor with SAPI standard issue for body armor was completed in early 2004. Between 2.0 and 2.5 million SAPI plates were issued. Additional protection was added for upper arm and underarm areas in the form of the Groin Protector (two sizes), the one-size Deltoid and Axillary Protector (DAP), and the Enhanced Side Ballistic Insert (ESBI) or side SAPI (SSAPI). Other components include the Yoke and Collar Assembly (eight sizes; X-Small, Small, Medium, Large, X-Large, XX-Large, XXX-Large, XXXX-Large) and the one-size Throat Protector.

I defy anyone to 'grope' a person wearing one of these.
PERIOD
NO. WAY.
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Everything you ever wanted to know about 'Body Armor' (flak jackets) (Original Post) trof Nov 2017 OP
I don't know... according to some nothing can stop SUPER Al Franken... bagelsforbreakfast Nov 2017 #1
Plus he has xray vision and doesn't have to consult rzemanfl Nov 2017 #3
Since you bring it up, I have a question. LisaM Nov 2017 #2
Just the women, because all men are pigs. n/t rzemanfl Nov 2017 #4
Please tell me this is sarcasm? trof Nov 2017 #10
It is, but to some here it seems to be the gospel truth chisled in stone. n/t rzemanfl Nov 2017 #11
whew...yes. trof Nov 2017 #12
I would not think so. trof Nov 2017 #7
Small arms and shrapnel can easily penetrate the skin VMA131Marine Nov 2017 #13
If you say so, but... trof Nov 2017 #15
You wear it on takeoff and until you are not over the combat zone. Lee-Lee Nov 2017 #21
It looks like the guy next to her is wearing that stuff too. Kirk Lover Nov 2017 #14
This is exactly what I thought when seeing the picture on the internet R B Garr Nov 2017 #16
Yes, when taking off from a combat zone until you Lee-Lee Nov 2017 #20
Spot on. cwydro Nov 2017 #5
Also, on a 36-hour flight home mainer Nov 2017 #6
No sir. You get as comfortable as you can. trof Nov 2017 #8
Then she sure was sleeping weirdly mainer Nov 2017 #9
Ive never believed she was sleeping. BannonsLiver Nov 2017 #17
I have worked on Flak Jackets........ ProudMNDemocrat Nov 2017 #18
Thank you. trof Nov 2017 #19
It doesn't take any brains to understand the humor in the picture. rgbecker Nov 2017 #22
Franken is obviously leering, mugging, playing to type. trof Nov 2017 #23
Thanks, good idea, I'll do the same. rgbecker Nov 2017 #27
I was a member of a fraternity in college in the early 60s. trof Nov 2017 #29
It's a great joke! PJMcK Nov 2017 #28
When I was a police officer (back when dinosaurs roamed the earth), I wore a bullet-proof vest. Vinca Nov 2017 #24
Thank you. trof Nov 2017 #25
The PASGT flak vest only offered protection against fragmentation Not Ruth Nov 2017 #26

rzemanfl

(29,565 posts)
3. Plus he has xray vision and doesn't have to consult
Fri Nov 17, 2017, 06:59 PM
Nov 2017
Playboy for target acquisition data. He's a totally awesome stud. Puzzles me why he has been with the same woman for so long.

for those who have fallen prey to the Republican Dehumorizer.

LisaM

(27,815 posts)
2. Since you bring it up, I have a question.
Fri Nov 17, 2017, 06:58 PM
Nov 2017

Would it be normal for a passenger on a plane, even a military plane, home to be wearing both a flak jacket and a helmet on the trip home? Franken wasn't wearing any protective gear and I don't think the other person was either (my point being, maybe the gear was donned for a photo-op).

However, since I really know very little about what USO entertainers wear on the plane home from their tours, I don't want to jump to any conclusions.

trof

(54,256 posts)
7. I would not think so.
Fri Nov 17, 2017, 07:03 PM
Nov 2017

The helmet and the vest are not comfortable to wear.
I would shed both as soon as I safely could.
Inside an airplane, there's really not much need for one.
If the plane takes a hit you're either going down or not. The vest won't help you.

IMHO either the gag photo was staged, or Tweeden thought the gear was still somehow protecting her.

VMA131Marine

(4,140 posts)
13. Small arms and shrapnel can easily penetrate the skin
Fri Nov 17, 2017, 07:51 PM
Nov 2017

of a cargo aircraft like the C-17 or C-130 without doing fatal damage to the aircraft. However, it could be fatal to someone inside the aircraft, hence the need to wear body armor when ground fire is potentially expected and within range.

trof

(54,256 posts)
15. If you say so, but...
Fri Nov 17, 2017, 08:06 PM
Nov 2017

I notice that Franken is wearing neither helmet nor vest.
I guess he is either incredibly brave or abysmally stupid.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
16. This is exactly what I thought when seeing the picture on the internet
Fri Nov 17, 2017, 08:10 PM
Nov 2017

the first time without hearing any setup to what was going on with the accusations. Why would she be wearing a helmet and flak jacket on the plane? So it looked so obviously staged. Plus, Franken was in civilian clothes, no helmet was not touching her. He is smiling for the camera.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
20. Yes, when taking off from a combat zone until you
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 05:15 PM
Nov 2017

have departed the airspace over the combat zone. Then you can take it off.

BannonsLiver

(16,398 posts)
17. Ive never believed she was sleeping.
Fri Nov 17, 2017, 08:13 PM
Nov 2017

Everything with Trumpkins must be questioned regardless of their gender.

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,786 posts)
18. I have worked on Flak Jackets........
Fri Nov 17, 2017, 08:35 PM
Nov 2017

For my customers who are in the Reserves and Police Department. They are heavy and bulky. Built to resist ammunition rounds and shrapnel. I tried one one and there is no way breasts feel any groping. Just the weight of the jacket against the chest.

rgbecker

(4,832 posts)
22. It doesn't take any brains to understand the humor in the picture.
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 06:25 PM
Nov 2017

The idea of feeling up someone who is wearing a flak vest is a riot and Franken shouldn't be so hard on himself....its a great photo making a great joke.

This is so much a RW hack job by Tweeden, she will certainly get the promotion she has been hoping for from her radio station.

trof

(54,256 posts)
23. Franken is obviously leering, mugging, playing to type.
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 06:34 PM
Nov 2017

I feel so badly for him. He's such a decent human being.
I went to his senate website and sent him a message of encouragement.

rgbecker

(4,832 posts)
27. Thanks, good idea, I'll do the same.
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 07:17 PM
Nov 2017

God forbid a picture of me from years ago ever shows up anywhere.

trof

(54,256 posts)
29. I was a member of a fraternity in college in the early 60s.
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 07:55 PM
Nov 2017

I am DAMN glad nobody had a cellphone with a camera back then.
Let's just say that I possibly did not conduct myself with a total respect for womanhood?

No, I did not rise (or sink) to the level of whipping it out and manipulating it.
But my secondary goal in life (after studying enough to at least pass all my classes) was to get laid.

I subscribed to Playboy.
I papered the walls of my room with the artfully airbrushed centerfolds.
All four walls. 360 degrees..
My room was the envy of the fraternity house.
I was 19.

Now I'm 76. I've matured a bit.
Recently I said "I didn't have real good sense until I was in my mid 30s."
Miz t. looked at me and said "Try mid 40s."
Maybe so.

PJMcK

(22,037 posts)
28. It's a great joke!
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 07:20 PM
Nov 2017

The idea that if he grabbed her breasts he'd end up smashing his fingers into Kevlar is hysterical!

At least it is to me.

Roy Moore chasing after high school girls, however, has no humor. Trump grabbing women without their consent, (it's hard to imagine they'd ever give it!), isn't funny and although I've spent many hours of my life in men's locker rooms, no one talks like he did on the Access Hollywood tape.

Vinca

(50,279 posts)
24. When I was a police officer (back when dinosaurs roamed the earth), I wore a bullet-proof vest.
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 06:36 PM
Nov 2017

There is no way in hell anyone could have groped my boobies without taking that thing off. The Franken photo was obviously comedy and not a serious "grope."

 

Not Ruth

(3,613 posts)
26. The PASGT flak vest only offered protection against fragmentation
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 07:15 PM
Nov 2017

If they were wearing flak vests, that is nothing like a bullet proof vest. And vice versa.

I suspect that one is more comfortable than the other, but could not say which one.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Everything you ever wante...