General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEvidence that Kayla Moore is a wretched human being
"After losing his husband in a car accident only three months after their marriage ceremony, Alabama resident Paul Hard found his pain was only beginning. His dead husbands mother Pat Fancher immediately moved to take control of her sons estate and all inheritance. After LGBT marriage equality arrived in Alabama, Hard filed for and received an amended death certificate showing he and his husband Charles David Fancher were married at the time of Fanchers death. This should have been the end of it.
Almost a year after her sons death Pat Fancher is still fighting her son-in-law for control of her sons estate. Working with the Foundation For Moral Law (FML) to sue for her sons estate, Fancher still believes Hard is not entitled to any of his dead husbands estate citing several legally-questionable reasons."
"Adding her two cents to the lawsuit, FML president Kayla Moore (who just happens to be Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moores wife) argued:
It is outrageous that five unelected lawyers on the U.S. Supreme Court think they can invalidate a constitutional amendment adopted by 81% of Alabama voters in 2006, on the flimsy ground that violates a so-called right found nowhere in the Constitution. It adds insult to injury to contend that this so-called right should be applied retroactively to matters that should have been settled long ago.
"
http://www.peacock-panache.com/2015/07/al-mother-still-fighting-to-block-dead-son-fancher-husband-from-estate-11228.html
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)That foundation seems to have more than a few cracks in it. Shouldn't have put it on such shaky ground!
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)The lady holding up the "teabagging for Jesus" sign, Nixon's the one, Committee to Re-Elect the President.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)And is doing everything they can to drag us all back there.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)Maraya1969
(22,497 posts)rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)The constitution does not cover multi round guns, but the Court says they are legal, the Constution does not cover air travel, but we have air travel and regulations and the Court rule on them.
The thing that I despise about the right is they cherry pick certain rights that they want held sacred and any not in agreement with what they want are to them invalid, ISIS thinks the same way.