Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:05 PM Jul 2012

Wouldn't it be great if changes were made to respect the families of the dead in Aurora?

Social pressure counts for something.

It needs to become UNCOOL to be into guns and hyperviolence as entertainment or hobby.

All gun owners need to be engaged with community education and speak out against violence.

Hollywood hyperviolent narratives and most of all video game violence needs to be curbed.

We need change or we are disrespecting the victims and their families.

Enough is enough.

94 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wouldn't it be great if changes were made to respect the families of the dead in Aurora? (Original Post) flamingdem Jul 2012 OP
Maybe a few of the families of the dead don't want those changes. Drunken Irishman Jul 2012 #1
I expect that the majority of them are sane people flamingdem Jul 2012 #2
Do you really believe violent video games led to this? Drunken Irishman Jul 2012 #14
I think it's a violent context and shame over mental illness AND access to guns flamingdem Jul 2012 #15
Really? Are we still in 2012 arguing 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #19
I said it's the context and this includes: flamingdem Jul 2012 #21
You realize games have been getting more realistic and graphic 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #35
I blame KISS. Drunken Irishman Jul 2012 #28
You mean the Knights in Satan's Service? 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #44
And Judas Priest obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #63
It's that demon weed. Iggo Jul 2012 #40
This is why I don't like these arguments. We're so quick to place blame. Drunken Irishman Jul 2012 #36
It's context, our culture has a violent context driven by $ nt flamingdem Jul 2012 #46
And yet, violent crime continues to plummet. Drunken Irishman Jul 2012 #58
Due to community policing, shaking down the small timers nt flamingdem Jul 2012 #59
Right... Drunken Irishman Jul 2012 #61
Better to answer with what you think it's about flamingdem Jul 2012 #72
So you're saying that people who watch violent entertainment are the cause of this? mythology Jul 2012 #88
I question the mental health of anyone that owns more than a hunting rifle or small handgun. Comrade_McKenzie Jul 2012 #3
Exactly. We need at least on a social level, reject the idea of needing flamingdem Jul 2012 #4
Agreed. AngryOldDem Jul 2012 #9
Exactly! gregoire Jul 2012 #77
Maybe yes, maybe no sarisataka Jul 2012 #82
You were being sarcastic, right? n/t PavePusher Jul 2012 #86
"You don't need an AK-47 to hunt game." PavePusher Jul 2012 #85
I question the motivations of anyone that medicalizes disagreeing with their political stances. (nt) Posteritatis Jul 2012 #42
I am so sick of hearing about guns guns guns. Nothing is going to change. Unless the nut southernyankeebelle Jul 2012 #5
I recall hearing the same after Columbine AngryOldDem Jul 2012 #6
There's a financial pay-off behind this that drives it in congress + 6 billion industry flamingdem Jul 2012 #7
Do you know why it's a 6 bILLION dollar industry? ramikin Jul 2012 #65
Yes bongbong Jul 2012 #93
Columbine was instrumental in getting a lot of gun laws passed 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #17
Why didn't you post this in the RKBA forum? ProgressiveProfessor Jul 2012 #8
Why would you write something so ridiculous today? flamingdem Jul 2012 #10
I am not one of those complaining about the phenomena ProgressiveProfessor Jul 2012 #11
Because the story is in the news and it is of interest to more people than those in the sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #13
. GarroHorus Jul 2012 #12
Maybe it should be UNCOOL to equate legal and safe gun ownership with "hyperviolence" 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #16
Gun owners who are responsible can contribute to education about hyperviolence flamingdem Jul 2012 #18
Seems you're shifting the blame on to people who are not responsible 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #20
That was the wingnut extremist viewpoint after 9/11 GarroHorus Jul 2012 #23
And was that right or wrong of them? 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author GarroHorus Jul 2012 #29
Agree 100% 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #41
Who are the anti-gun extremists? Kingofalldems Jul 2012 #91
My opinion is that owning a gun has a social importance flamingdem Jul 2012 #24
People who own swimming pools are 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #30
If they don't prevent a death they are of course liable nt flamingdem Jul 2012 #33
Now you've changed the argument 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #38
It's about intent. A gun carries with it the intent to kill nt flamingdem Jul 2012 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author GarroHorus Jul 2012 #47
Well in urban areas guns are for killing others, happens every day nt flamingdem Jul 2012 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author GarroHorus Jul 2012 #56
You confuse one use with universal intent. Igel Jul 2012 #71
Let Mr. Luthor handle this 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #52
You honestly believe about 50 million Americans intend to commit murder? 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #49
BATFE estimates over 90 million. ramikin Jul 2012 #67
Could be 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #92
THAT is the perfect analogy obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #66
Gun owners don't have to prove a thing to you or anybody else for that matter Daniel537 Jul 2012 #22
Well you win because the selfish rule in this culture flamingdem Jul 2012 #26
How selfish of us not to want to be blamed for the actions of others 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #31
How selfish of you to not even consider that we need to make changes flamingdem Jul 2012 #37
When all else fails 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #39
Hide yours behind the 2nd amendment and the nra nt flamingdem Jul 2012 #43
Ok 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #48
Yeah, back when they had long rifles flamingdem Jul 2012 #54
You do realize automatic weapons 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #62
The number one caliber used in shootings is a .22LR obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #68
Back to the Long Rifle flamingdem Jul 2012 #69
Sure... right after the police, military and all politico's bodyguards do it. PavePusher Jul 2012 #87
I am talking about handguns obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #94
+300,000,000 n/t GarroHorus Jul 2012 #27
That is ridiculous obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #64
One of the first rules of IT I learned was GIGO-- Garbage In, Garbage Out. LanternWaste Jul 2012 #32
Most murderers are career criminals krispos42 Jul 2012 #34
That's a silly argument, sorry Spider Jerusalem Jul 2012 #50
Add yourself to the status quo flamingdem Jul 2012 #53
It's the Canadians I tell you !!!!!!! zzaapp Jul 2012 #55
Yeah, your OP isn't totally disconnected from reality or anything. Totally not. Edweird Jul 2012 #57
Heh. You'd think I said something controversial flamingdem Jul 2012 #60
Humans are, by nature, violent. 'Twas always thus and always will be. Edweird Jul 2012 #70
Disagree. Look at England flamingdem Jul 2012 #73
Eh, maybe it's because they get it all out when they beat the shit out of each other at 'football' Edweird Jul 2012 #74
fail. You cannot answer this and it proves the point of this thread flamingdem Jul 2012 #76
See my other response.... LOL Edweird Jul 2012 #79
BTW here's a 'look at England': Edweird Jul 2012 #78
Look up # of deaths from guns USA vs. Britain nt flamingdem Jul 2012 #80
My statement is that humans are, by nature, violent. Edweird Jul 2012 #81
The statistics disprove what you're saying. It's what is tolerated in a society nt flamingdem Jul 2012 #83
What statistics? Edweird Jul 2012 #84
We've tried that - doesn't work with the leaders of the NRA LynneSin Jul 2012 #75
What, exactly, are you trying to insinuate? PavePusher Jul 2012 #89
Well... Marinedem Jul 2012 #90

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
2. I expect that the majority of them are sane people
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:07 PM
Jul 2012

and want something better for other families than senseless violence.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
14. Do you really believe violent video games led to this?
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:33 PM
Jul 2012

You said it yourself - senseless violence. It shouldn't make sense and offering up reasons why it does is futile.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
15. I think it's a violent context and shame over mental illness AND access to guns
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:35 PM
Jul 2012

It's of course not one thing.

An expert was just on msnbc explaining how the psychotic practices using video games.

For some the games relieve their aggression but for those less balanced it's a way of
heightening it and exploring their hate and urge to kill.

Have you seen the level of violence in this years crop of games?

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
19. Really? Are we still in 2012 arguing
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:39 PM
Jul 2012

that this is caused by videogames?

You forgot that new "hip hop" stuff the music television is playing.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
21. I said it's the context and this includes:
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:43 PM
Jul 2012

Hyperviolent movies games and entertainment including music videos

Shame over dealing with psychopathic behavior in the family

A culture that glorifies rather than ridicules people who groove on guns for a hobby

A drive to war and killing millions with very little reflection on a social level

A military and guns culture

(My guess is that this guy grew up connected to the navy and gun culture in San Diego, just a hunch)

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
35. You realize games have been getting more realistic and graphic
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:48 PM
Jul 2012

and available and guns are becoming more common but crime rates have been steadily dropping.

You know that right?

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
44. You mean the Knights in Satan's Service?
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:51 PM
Jul 2012

If you play their records backwards it sounds . . . just awful really.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
36. This is why I don't like these arguments. We're so quick to place blame.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:48 PM
Jul 2012

Some people are just born crazy. You can strip out all the violence from video games and movies and crazy will still be there. Violent video games did not cause this kid to shoot. It did not make him more dangerous or heighten his urge to kill. The fact is, you don't know what his background was, what he did in his spare time, who he associated with, what games he played or what movies he watched.

To put this on video games is a cop out.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
88. So you're saying that people who watch violent entertainment are the cause of this?
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 06:04 PM
Jul 2012

In other words, the very people watching the movie until some idiot came in to shoot them.

Gun violence isn't nearly as black and white as either gun supporters like the NRA or people who want to ban guns altogether want to admit.

 

Comrade_McKenzie

(2,526 posts)
3. I question the mental health of anyone that owns more than a hunting rifle or small handgun.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:08 PM
Jul 2012

I think we should mandate screenings or revoke ownership, immediately.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
4. Exactly. We need at least on a social level, reject the idea of needing
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:11 PM
Jul 2012

any major firepower to "hunt" or "protect". It's a power trip, when is it needed?

It's not needed. It IS culturally acceptable to be into gun violence.

Screenings are a minimum requirement - as a society we should be able to manage that!

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
9. Agreed.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:22 PM
Jul 2012

You don't need an AK-47 to hunt game. And if you think you need to carry a gun with you everywhere you go, that's another issue.

I have read comments on other sites today that if someone in the audience had had his gun with him, the number of dead and injured would have been cut in half. THAT mentality is almost as bad as the mentality that leads to tragedies like this in the first place. I just have a vision of a shootout in a crowded, dark, and smoky theater. Insane.

Until this country somehow overcomes its fascination and obsession with weaponry, we'll just keep seeing more of this.

 

gregoire

(192 posts)
77. Exactly!
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 05:26 PM
Jul 2012

The solution to too many bullets is not more bullets. Thankfully there wasn't one of those CCW people in the theater to escalate the level of violence.

sarisataka

(18,679 posts)
82. Maybe yes, maybe no
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 05:45 PM
Jul 2012

Odds are there was at least one carrier there, likely more, who did not shoot. Was it too dark, too much risk of hitting an innocents, we will never know.
If there was a carrier in the 2nd row who shot him after his first shot- would that person be the hero of the day?
There wasn't so we won't ever know that either.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
85. "You don't need an AK-47 to hunt game."
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 05:55 PM
Jul 2012

And you don't need a .30-30 lever-action rifle either....

But the AK-pattern rifle is ballistically almost identical and, with hunting-legal magazines (generally 5 rounds or less, varies by state laws), makes a fine hunting rifle for deer.

Please cite to where a lawful carrier engaged in a shoot-out with a criminal that ended up with 12 dead and 50+ wounded.

We'll wait.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
5. I am so sick of hearing about guns guns guns. Nothing is going to change. Unless the nut
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:13 PM
Jul 2012

who is the president of the NRA or his family members are hurt badly by his supporters nothing will change. How many more of these incidents take place before things change?

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
6. I recall hearing the same after Columbine
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:16 PM
Jul 2012

That's the trouble with this country -- we wail, rend our garments, and gnash our teeth over tragedies like this for a few days, then it's right back to business as usual.

It's clear this country has a problem with guns -- see this post http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002982217 -- but no one ever seems to want to engage in conversation about what can be done about it.

Politicians, for instance, need to grow a pair and stand up to the NRA lobby. That would be a wonderful start.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
7. There's a financial pay-off behind this that drives it in congress + 6 billion industry
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:20 PM
Jul 2012

The US gun and ammunition manufacturing industry includes about 300 companies with combined annual revenue of about $6 billion.

saw this:
http://www.occasionalplanet.org/2012/04/23/nra-official-pimp-for-the-multi-billion-dollar-gun-industry/

The National Rifle Association (NRA) is the lobbying arm of the firearms industry. It uses fear, racism, and focus-group tested catchwords like “freedom,” and “self-defence” to pimp sales for the over 300 firearms manufacturers in the United States. While the NRA represents itself as an association of gun enthusiasts, its real purpose is to serve the interests of gun manufacturers. To that end, it bullies elected officials into passing laws that will make it easier for the gun industry sell more rifles and handguns. It promotes gun sales among the public by stoking fear and racism. It conflates patriotism with gun ownership, suggesting individuals have a patriotic duty to own a firearm.

Playing off fear and racism, the NRA says “good,” people should carry a gun to protect themselves from “bad” people whom they perceive as threatening them or their loved ones. In its latest strategy to boost gun sales, the NRA has, with the help of ALEC, passed “Stand Your Ground” or “Kill at Will” laws in dozens of states across the country. By encouraging a vigilante mindset, these new laws have resulted in a large increase in “justifiable homicides.” Unfortunately, the recent shooting in Florida of “bad” hoodie-wearing, unarmed African-American teenager Trayvon Martin by “good” gun-toting, neighborhood watch citizen George Zimmerman may add to that statistic.

 

ramikin

(20 posts)
65. Do you know why it's a 6 bILLION dollar industry?
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 04:21 PM
Jul 2012

Because perfectly sane, everyday, non murderous, polite and civil people buy them...daily.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
17. Columbine was instrumental in getting a lot of gun laws passed
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:38 PM
Jul 2012

they didn't accomplish anything and many were later rejected.

We like to implement feel good measures after incidents like this that do nothing to make us safer and aren't based on any rational understanding of the facts.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
8. Why didn't you post this in the RKBA forum?
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:21 PM
Jul 2012

There has been a growing litany of complaints of firearms threads leaking into the rest of DU.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
11. I am not one of those complaining about the phenomena
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:24 PM
Jul 2012

But was curious as to why it was happening. Those who object are whining about it more loudly these days in meta

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
13. Because the story is in the news and it is of interest to more people than those in the
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:26 PM
Jul 2012

gun forum?

A huge tragedy just occurred, maybe the focus should be on the lives lost rather than on politics, at least for a day or so?

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
16. Maybe it should be UNCOOL to equate legal and safe gun ownership with "hyperviolence"
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:36 PM
Jul 2012

and mass murder?

Especially considering how many millions of americans own guns.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
18. Gun owners who are responsible can contribute to education about hyperviolence
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:38 PM
Jul 2012

and show us that they are different and sane as opposed to those who glorify guns.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
20. Seems you're shifting the blame on to people who are not responsible
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:40 PM
Jul 2012

should it have been incumbent upon muslims following 9/11 to prove to us that they aren't all violent terrorists?

 

GarroHorus

(1,055 posts)
23. That was the wingnut extremist viewpoint after 9/11
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:44 PM
Jul 2012

All I heard from wingnuts was the Muslims never condemned 9/11, even though they did and the media never played it.

Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #25)

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
24. My opinion is that owning a gun has a social importance
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:44 PM
Jul 2012

and this is ignored in our culture due to the NRA.

Yes, it should be incumbent on gun owners to give back to society since they might take someone's life
and insist upon having a tool that could end the life of an innocent, even if by tragic accident.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
30. People who own swimming pools are
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:47 PM
Jul 2012

by far more likely to contribute to a childs death than those who own guns.

Should people who feel the need to own swimming pools be obligated to provide free swimming lessons to the community and apologize every time a child drowns?

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
38. Now you've changed the argument
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:50 PM
Jul 2012

with guns it's everyone who owns one contributing.

With pools it's if you didn't specifically prevent a death.

What gun owners failed to act to prevent this?

Response to flamingdem (Reply #45)

Response to flamingdem (Reply #51)

Igel

(35,323 posts)
71. You confuse one use with universal intent.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 04:59 PM
Jul 2012

Yes, in urban--and not-so-urban--guns are used daily for killing people.

But it's also true that in any area most guns aren't used even once a year for killing people. Most civilian-owned guns are never used for shooting at people.

My brother owns more than a few guns. Some he hunted with a long time ago. Javalina, mostly. But he also does target shooting competitions and has won trophies. He and his son go out 2-3 weekends a month to target shoot. Sometimes at inside gun ranges. Sometimes at outside gun ranges.

Don't confuse "some people do this" with "it's what everybody intends."

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
49. You honestly believe about 50 million Americans intend to commit murder?
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:56 PM
Jul 2012

Or 1 in 6.

Best run and hide then.

 

Daniel537

(1,560 posts)
22. Gun owners don't have to prove a thing to you or anybody else for that matter
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:43 PM
Jul 2012

Don't like the 2nd amendment, well that's your problem. The idea that we need to change our way of life just because of psychopath's like this guy in Colorado sounds a lot like the excuses that were used to trample on our civil liberties after 9/11. Pass.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
26. Well you win because the selfish rule in this culture
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:46 PM
Jul 2012

and we all pay the consequences for those who don't give a shit about the overall social good.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
37. How selfish of you to not even consider that we need to make changes
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:49 PM
Jul 2012

and to do any less is to disrespect the victims of gun violence

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
48. Ok
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:53 PM
Jul 2012

I will stick with 200+ years of legal precedent and the constitution based on the rights of free englishmen established for centuries before that all of which has been upheld consistently by legal experts despite rigorous opposition.

You base it on a recent tragedy and "won't somebody think about the children!?"

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
62. You do realize automatic weapons
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 04:16 PM
Jul 2012

are heavily restricted and very difficult to get.

Also very rarely used to commit crimes here.

obamanut2012

(26,084 posts)
68. The number one caliber used in shootings is a .22LR
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 04:27 PM
Jul 2012

So maybe all .22LR caliber firearms should be banned.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
87. Sure... right after the police, military and all politico's bodyguards do it.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 06:03 PM
Jul 2012

Good luck with that.

obamanut2012

(26,084 posts)
64. That is ridiculous
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 04:21 PM
Jul 2012

Law abiding citizens will have to prove they are law abiding citizens by giving lectures against crime, and if they don;t, they are guilty?



 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
32. One of the first rules of IT I learned was GIGO-- Garbage In, Garbage Out.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:48 PM
Jul 2012

One of the first rules of IT I learned was GIGO-- Garbage In, Garbage Out. This one piece of garbage-malware on your PC is not the only cause of PC crashing; however, at best, it doesn't help your PC to run more efficiently, and at worst, it is one additional cause among many that caused the crash.

But despite those obvious warnings, I have to reformat three or four PCs a year because users keep downloading trash onto their systems.




I often think that same truism may be applied to a culture...

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
34. Most murderers are career criminals
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:48 PM
Jul 2012

They're into guns because guns help them commit crimes.




Legalize it, and the criminals become unemployed.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
50. That's a silly argument, sorry
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:56 PM
Jul 2012

the dead don't care, their families' positions on gun control aren't knowable; I think that the US needs stricter gun control, but I think that using a tragedy like this and claiming to speak on behalf of the victims or their families is really rather tasteless.

 

Edweird

(8,570 posts)
70. Humans are, by nature, violent. 'Twas always thus and always will be.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 04:57 PM
Jul 2012

Pretending otherwise is completely divorced from reality. Your 'problem solving' doesn't exist.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
73. Disagree. Look at England
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 05:17 PM
Jul 2012

why is the US homicide rate 10 grand a year and others in Europe under a hundred?

 

Edweird

(8,570 posts)
74. Eh, maybe it's because they get it all out when they beat the shit out of each other at 'football'
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 05:20 PM
Jul 2012

games. Murder isn't the only form of violence, yanno.

 

Edweird

(8,570 posts)
78. BTW here's a 'look at England':
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 05:27 PM
Jul 2012

The most violent country in Europe: Britain is also worse than South Africa and U.S.

Britain's violent crime record is worse than any other country in the European union, it has been revealed.

Official crime figures show the UK also has a worse rate for all types of violence than the U.S. and even South Africa - widely considered one of the world's most dangerous countries.

The figures comes on the day new Home Secretary Alan Johnson makes his first major speech on crime, promising to be tough on loutish behaviour.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1196941/The-violent-country-Europe-Britain-worse-South-Africa-U-S.html

So much for that argument.....

 

Edweird

(8,570 posts)
81. My statement is that humans are, by nature, violent.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 05:40 PM
Jul 2012

You're going off on a tangent. Humans are violent by nature. You cannot and will not change that any more than a gay person can be 'prayed' or whatever straight. It isn't going to happen. Violence, in many different forms, is prevalent all over the globe. It not the 'American culture', it's the Homo Genus. Of course, you're welcome to fight it - it will be good for lulz.

 

Edweird

(8,570 posts)
84. What statistics?
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 05:53 PM
Jul 2012

If your only definition of 'violence' is 'murder', you are strangely and sadly mistaken.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
75. We've tried that - doesn't work with the leaders of the NRA
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 05:20 PM
Jul 2012

I'm guessing next month they'll have a convention in Colorado just like they did after Colombine.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
89. What, exactly, are you trying to insinuate?
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 06:06 PM
Jul 2012

There are plenty of reasons to be against the NRA without making shit up and looking like an ignoramous.

 

Marinedem

(373 posts)
90. Well...
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 06:15 PM
Jul 2012

Social pressure counts for something.

It needs to become UNCOOL to be into guns and hyperviolence as entertainment or hobby.

Why should it be any more or less cool than anything else. I love shooting. Whats wrong with that. I don't know what you mean by "Hyperviolence". Seriously. what is that?

All gun owners need to be engaged with community education and speak out against violence.

Never met one that didn't. The reason I carry a gun is because I realize that violence is prevalent and I oppose it being done unto me. Many like me take every opportunity to educate other people on gun safety and responsibility.

Hollywood hyperviolent narratives and most of all video game violence needs to be curbed.

Sorry. I'll NEVER advocate the suppression of free speech and expression, no matter how tasteless. Not a fan of violent movies or video games, but I'll defend your right to play them until I'm blue and out of breath.

We need change or we are disrespecting the victims and their families.

We can respect the families by not politicizing this awful tragedy. Good job OP

Enough is enough.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wouldn't it be great if c...