Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

trueblue2007

(17,237 posts)
14. WHAT DOES THE ARTICLE SAY??? We're glad you're enjoying The Washington Post. Get access to this sto
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 02:06 AM
Nov 2017

We're glad you're enjoying
The Washington Post.
Get access to this story, and every story, on the web and in our apps with our Basic Digital subscription.

elleng

(131,077 posts)
15. I'm not a subscriber, but got this and more. Don't know why.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 02:48 PM
Nov 2017

'Let’s be clear on what’s happening in our politics right now. President Trump and his media allies are currently creating a vast, multi-tentacled, largely-fictional alternate media reality that casts large swaths of our government as irredeemably corrupt — with the explicitly declared purpose of laying the rationale for Trump to pardon his close associates or shut down the Russia probe, should he deem either necessary.

We often hear that Trump and his allies are trying to “distract” from special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s intensifying investigation. That’s true, but this characterization inadequately casts this in terms ordinarily applied to conventional politics. Instead, Trump’s trafficking in this stuff should be seen as another sign of his fundamental unfitness to serve as president. Similar efforts by his media allies should be labeled as a deliberate effort to goad Trump into sliding into full-blown authoritarianism, and to provide the air cover for him if he does do so.

The Associated Press reports that people who have spoken to Trump say that he has recently revisited the idea of trying to remove Mueller, now that Mueller appears to be digging into Trump’s finances. Meanwhile, CNN reports that former Trump strategist Stephen K. Bannon is privately urging Trump to try to get Republicans to defund Mueller’s probe.

Monday night, Sean Hannity delivered perhaps the most perfect expression yet of efforts to create the rationale for such moves. Hannity dismissed the news of major allegations against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and the cooperation of adviser George Papadopoulos as big nothingburgers. He also hit all the high points of the new Trump/media campaign, points that Trump himself and the White House have made repeatedly in public statements. Those include reviving the made-up scandal that Hillary Clinton approved a deal for a Russian nuclear agency to gain access to U.S. uranium extraction rights in exchange for kickbacks, and the absurdly exaggerated claim that the Clinton campaign, having paid through various intermediaries for research that ultimately led to the “Steele Dossier,” actually colluded with Russia to interfere in the election. These have been extensively fact checked and debunked.'>>>

roamer65

(36,747 posts)
2. The Constitution is a compact between the states.
Sun Nov 12, 2017, 09:47 PM
Nov 2017

If Dump and his minions break that compact, all hell will break loose.

Squinch

(50,993 posts)
3. Most of it is behind a paywall for me. Other than Trump(R)'s fake news bullshit, is there anything
Sun Nov 12, 2017, 09:49 PM
Nov 2017

else in the oped that supports the headline? (And supports it now, as the article is 2 weeks old?)

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
6. Rumors that he talked about firing Mueller again
Sun Nov 12, 2017, 10:27 PM
Nov 2017

But literally nobody thinks that is a good idea. Bannon wants him to defund Mueller's operation. That's about it.

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
11. I bet he'd work without pay.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:27 AM
Nov 2017

And anyone working for him that could afford to would as well.

I know I would.

Turbineguy

(37,364 posts)
7. You may be very correct.
Sun Nov 12, 2017, 11:15 PM
Nov 2017

I came across this when looking at something else (the bane of the Internet!). Since then Hannity has lowered his standing some. And that helps. I really wonder who wants to go to jail for Trump. I think of all those guys that went to jail for Nixon when he walked. Also, Trump pardoning anybody would be obstruction of justice as well.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
5. This would worry me if he had higher approval
Sun Nov 12, 2017, 09:53 PM
Nov 2017

As it is the majority of the country seems to see through his BS.

Girard442

(6,083 posts)
9. If Trump should fire Mueller, we'd be in totally uncharted territory.
Sun Nov 12, 2017, 11:25 PM
Nov 2017

Don't say he can't. What if he just tweets, "Mueller, you fired!" and sends U.S. Marshalls or Secret Service to board up his offices?

Kimchijeon

(1,606 posts)
17. Probably trumptard
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 03:57 PM
Nov 2017

Since they don't have the ethical fortitude to impeach his treasonous ass, I have no faith in any of them. Until the corporate oligarchy deems it convenient, we are stuck with the circus sideshow distraction. 💔👎

lame54

(35,317 posts)
16. Mueller is probably way ahead of them...
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 02:50 PM
Nov 2017

The firings will trigger a massive document dump

Just my guess

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We may be about to see th...