Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 10:26 AM Jul 2012

The Geography of Gun Deaths

http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/01/the-geography-of-gun-deaths/69354/


Terrible tragedies like last week's mass shootings in Tucson cause us to search for deeper answers. Many were quick to blame America's divisive and vitriolic political culture for the violence; others portray the shooter as an unhinged, clinically deranged person with his own unfathomable agenda. Arizona has been ground zero for the battle over immigration. Were the state's political and economic travails a contributing factor? There has been some talk about guns, too. Might tighter gun control laws have made a difference?


***SNIP

With these data in hand, I decided to look at the factors associated with gun deaths at the state level. With the help of my colleague Charlotta Mellander, we charted the statistical correlations between firearm deaths and a variety of psychological, economic, social, and political characteristics of states. As usual, I point out that correlation does not imply causation, but simply points to associations between variables.



***SNIP

Firearm deaths are significantly lower in states with stricter gun control legislation. Though the sample sizes are small, we find substantial negative correlations between firearm deaths and states that ban assault weapons (-.45), require trigger locks (-.42), and mandate safe storage requirements for guns (-.48).
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Geography of Gun Deaths (Original Post) xchrom Jul 2012 OP
Recc'd for facts and figures. nt Comrade_McKenzie Jul 2012 #1
+1. tosh Jul 2012 #12
here's more about the rate of gun ownership and rate of gun deaths CreekDog Jul 2012 #31
Your statistics kind of bear out the point I was making below. Blue_In_AK Jul 2012 #41
This is really thought provoking. Well done! byeya Jul 2012 #2
Confirms what's long been suspected - happy, affluent liberals in CT rarely shoot up movie theaters. leveymg Jul 2012 #3
Lol! Happy, affluent liberals in CT. Nt xchrom Jul 2012 #4
Would be more accurate if done on the county level kctim Jul 2012 #5
Why stop there Capt. Obvious Jul 2012 #11
It would change the accuracy by a lot kctim Jul 2012 #24
And then Louisiana would no longer be #1 Capt. Obvious Jul 2012 #33
Sheesh! Given the distance you'd have to drive in some of those western states.... DCKit Jul 2012 #6
In many Western states, the population tends to be concentrated in cities. Lizzie Poppet Jul 2012 #7
Western States are more urban than the most urban states back east CreekDog Jul 2012 #32
I believe most shootings happen at home pscot Jul 2012 #9
Gun violence is concentrated in poor urban areas hack89 Jul 2012 #8
you need some statistics to back that claim up, without them, it's just a stereotype CreekDog Jul 2012 #20
Go talk to the cops in Chicago, DC or Philly hack89 Jul 2012 #22
that's not DATA, you know what, just say whatever you want, that's what you'll do anyway CreekDog Jul 2012 #29
"Over half of homicides (57.7%) occurred in cities with a population of 100,000 or more" hack89 Jul 2012 #35
Over 82% of Americans live in or near cities. Which makes the rural homicide rate much higher. n/t ieoeja Jul 2012 #40
You would be wrong about rural rates hack89 Jul 2012 #43
Get used to gun-religionists bongbong Jul 2012 #44
America's 25 Most Dangerous Neighborhoods hack89 Jul 2012 #25
rural crime and non-urban crime data please, you have provided none CreekDog Jul 2012 #28
Read my post and link again hack89 Jul 2012 #30
I didn't find anything there. ieoeja Jul 2012 #39
It's pretty intuitive. HopeHoops Jul 2012 #10
k&r n/t RainDog Jul 2012 #13
Looks to be a correlation between modest gun control Doctor_J Jul 2012 #14
Yup! Who indeed? Chorophyll Jul 2012 #17
My state, Louisiana, the worst! skip fox Jul 2012 #15
Nicely done. Chorophyll Jul 2012 #16
i have to admit CA surprises me. barbtries Jul 2012 #18
I think Maine may be an outlier of sorts magical thyme Jul 2012 #19
What would also be interesting matt819 Jul 2012 #21
The picture is quite different if you look at it on a city level rather than whole states slackmaster Jul 2012 #23
what is your interpretation of that picture? CreekDog Jul 2012 #34
Easy to answer - Violent crime is concentrated where there is poverty and lack of opportunity slackmaster Jul 2012 #36
57% of homicides in cities. 82% of people in cities. ieoeja Jul 2012 #42
Wow, so mental illness is negatively correlated with gun deaths Progressive dog Jul 2012 #26
First question is: turtlerescue1 Jul 2012 #27
BAN POOR PEOPLE! 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #37
These charts shows firearms deaths/injuries, right, Blue_In_AK Jul 2012 #38
Looks to me like Louisiana is abot due for a big problem. MichiganVote Jul 2012 #45
kick CreekDog Dec 2012 #46

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
31. here's more about the rate of gun ownership and rate of gun deaths
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 01:39 PM
Jul 2012
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x357945

Top 10 states in gun ownership: (average rate of gun ownership: 43% average gun death rate: 16.6)
Bottom 10 states in gun ownership: (average rate of gun ownership: 5.1 average gun death rate: 5.1)

and if you think they are all getting pushed out of windows in non-gun owning states, well, compare Mississippi to New York City (or State). the rate of murders in New York state is far lower than Mississippi, in fact, New York City's murder rate is lower than Mississippi's.

and here are the numbers I used...but again, i don't believe in a million years that any number i post will ever, ever lead you to say, "thank you, that's a good analysis." and your evidence for not doing so will be specious.

%OWN GUNS / GUN DEATHRATE
LA 44.1 19.9
MI 38.4 18.3
AK 57.8 17.6
AL 51.7 17.6
NV 33.8 16.2
AR 55.3 15.1
AZ 31.1 15
NM 34.8 15
TN 43.9 15
WV 55.4 14.8
MT 57.7 14.5
WY 59.7 14.5
KY 47.7 14.4
OK 42.9 13.4
SC 42.3 13.4
GA 40.3 13.1
MS 55.3 12.9
FL 24.5 12.5
ID 55.3 12.5
NC 41.3 12.3
MD 21.3 12.1
MN 41.7 10.9
PA 34.7 10.7
TX 35.9 10.7
VA 35.1 10.7
IN 39.1 10.6
KS 42.1 10.5
CO 34.7 10.4
OR 39.8 10.4
OH 32.4 9.6
UT 43.9 9.5
DE 25.5 9.2
CA 21.3 9
ND 50.7 8.9
WI 44.4 8.7
WA 33.1 8.5
VT 42 8.4
ME 40.5 8.1
IL 20.2 8
NE 38.6 8
MO 41.7 6.6
SD 56.6 6.5
NH 30 5.9
IA 42.8 5.3
NJ 12.3 5.2
NY 18 5.1
CT 16.7 4.3
MA 12.6 3.6
RI 12.8 3.5
HI 8.7 2.8

Least restrictive gun laws:
GUN DEATH RATE / RANK (least to most restrictive gun laws)
AZ 15 1
ID 12.5 2
VT 8.4 3
MI 18.3 4
KY 14.4 5
NM 15 6
AR 15.1 7
WY 14.5 8
ME 8.1 9
MT 14.5 10
AK 17.6 11
MO 12.9 12
GA 13.1 13
KS 10.5 14
ND 8.9 15
SD 6.5 16
OK 13.4 17
UT 9.5 18
NE 8 19
SC 13.4 20
IN 10.6 21
NV 16.2 22
LA 19.9 23
CO 10.4 24
WV 14.8 25
NH 5.9 26
AL 17.6 27
NC 12.3 28
OH 9.6 29
OR 10.4 30
TN 15 31
TX 10.7 32
DE 9.2 33
WI 8.7 34
VA 10.7 35
MN 6.6 36
WA 8.5 37
IA 5.3 38
MI 10.9 39
PA 10.7 40
FL 12.5 41
RI 3.5 42
NY 5.1 43
MD 12.1 44
IL 8 45
CT 4.3 46
HI 2.8 47
MA 3.6 48
NJ 5.2 49
CA 9 50

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
41. Your statistics kind of bear out the point I was making below.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:39 PM
Jul 2012

Alaska has one of the highest rates of gun ownership but proportionately a smaller rate of gun deaths than, say, New Jersey or California. There are all kinds of variables hidden inside the statistics.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
3. Confirms what's long been suspected - happy, affluent liberals in CT rarely shoot up movie theaters.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 10:42 AM
Jul 2012

Who reads The Atlantic?

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
11. Why stop there
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 11:38 AM
Jul 2012

It would be more accurate if done on the town level.

It would be even more accurate if done on the block level.

It would be super more accurate if done on the street level.

Actually, that wouldn't change the accuracy at all.

 

kctim

(3,575 posts)
24. It would change the accuracy by a lot
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 12:59 PM
Jul 2012

as it would narrow down the locations of responsible gun owners and irresponsible gun owners.
Doing this would show why fear based anti-2nd Amendment legislation blanketed across the country as whole is not wanted, needed or supported.

 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
6. Sheesh! Given the distance you'd have to drive in some of those western states....
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 11:10 AM
Jul 2012

just to find someone to shoot at, you'd think the numbers would be far lower than on the over crowded coasts.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
7. In many Western states, the population tends to be concentrated in cities.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 11:14 AM
Jul 2012

There isn't as much of the "build up" of the rural and semi-rural countryside that you see out East. there are a bunch of people in the urban/suburban centers, and a lot of (mostly) empty country in between them.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
32. Western States are more urban than the most urban states back east
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 01:45 PM
Jul 2012

for example, Nevada.

because, related to what you've pointed out, in Nevada, almost the entire population lives in the urbanized areas of Las Vegas and Reno.

in a place like New York, sure more people live in New York City, but there's a larger part of the population in the countryside than in say, rural Nevada, rural Utah or rural Arizona.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
8. Gun violence is concentrated in poor urban areas
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 11:19 AM
Jul 2012

Even within a small state like mine (Rhode Island), the vast majority of murders are concentrated in a few poor, high crime areas.

Poverty, drugs and gangs are the real problem.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
20. you need some statistics to back that claim up, without them, it's just a stereotype
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 12:52 PM
Jul 2012

people don't realize how much gun violence is domestic violence and how having guns in the home gives people with no record and no other obvious issues, the means to take a loved ones life in a moment of anger.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
22. Go talk to the cops in Chicago, DC or Philly
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 12:56 PM
Jul 2012

or any other city in the top 10 most dangerous cities in America.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
35. "Over half of homicides (57.7%) occurred in cities with a population of 100,000 or more"
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 01:52 PM
Jul 2012
Trends by city size

Changes in homicide trends have been driven by changes in
the number of homicides in large American cities

From 1980 to 2008

- Over half of homicides (57.7%) occurred in cities with a
population of 100,000 or more ( figure 45).

- More than a third of all homicides in large cities occurred in the
biggest cities (those with a population of 1 million or more) (not
shown).


http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

Read the entire document - tells you everything you would ever want to know about murder in America. Addresses everything from gang violence to domestic abuse.
 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
40. Over 82% of Americans live in or near cities. Which makes the rural homicide rate much higher. n/t
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:37 PM
Jul 2012

hack89

(39,171 posts)
43. You would be wrong about rural rates
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:00 PM
Jul 2012
http://oregonexplorer.info/rural/RuralIssues/CrimeandPolicing

or

The belief that crime occurs less frequently in rural areas is supported by recent
UCR data (see exhibit 1). Of particular interest is a comparison between police
reports of crime in cities of 250,000 people or more and in rural counties that
are outside metropolitan statistical areas and cover areas not under the jurisdiction
of municipal police departments. Exhibit 1 shows that urban crime rates
are higher than rural crime rates for every FBI Crime Index offense. Violent
crime rates are especially high in large cities relative to rural counties.


https://www.ncjrs.gov/criminal_justice2000/vol_1/02g.pdf

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
28. rural crime and non-urban crime data please, you have provided none
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 01:33 PM
Jul 2012

if you only provide data from one kind of place, then only those kind of places are included.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
30. Read my post and link again
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 01:38 PM
Jul 2012

it looks at the FBI crime data, sorts it by ZIP code and ranks neighborhoods by crime rates. Rural crime and non-urban crime was part of the analysis.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
39. I didn't find anything there.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:35 PM
Jul 2012

It showed rates for various size of cities with 100,000 or more people. But I could not find a rural rate. However, it is safe to assume the rural rate is higher based on:

57% of homicides in cities
82% of Americans live in or around cities

Interestingly, while the victimization rate is slightly higher in cities of over 1 million than in cities of 100,000-199,999, the offender rate is pretty much the same. Also, the rates in large cities has been dropping dramatically, while the rates in that smallest category has remained fairly stable. So the largest cities have caught up (in a good way) to the smaller large cities.


 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
14. Looks to be a correlation between modest gun control
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 11:40 AM
Jul 2012

and lower rates of firearm deaths.

Who would have thought that

barbtries

(28,805 posts)
18. i have to admit CA surprises me.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 12:12 PM
Jul 2012

since i'm from Los Angeles and to me it's like the wild west, people being murdered every single day and usually by firearm.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
19. I think Maine may be an outlier of sorts
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 12:13 PM
Jul 2012

We went strongly for Obama in '08. While we have some gun violence, I suspect a significant portion of our gun deaths are due to hunting accidents. Not that it makes a difference to the victims, but we get a number of "Dick Cheneys" running around in our woods during hunting season shooting at anything that moves.

matt819

(10,749 posts)
21. What would also be interesting
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 12:53 PM
Jul 2012

is to see the same kind of distribution of multiple murders per incident.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
36. Easy to answer - Violent crime is concentrated where there is poverty and lack of opportunity
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 01:54 PM
Jul 2012

It's far more common in large cities than in other places.

Looking at the map in the OP and concluding anything about the incidence of violence in a particular state is simplistic. Look at California - Modest crime rate overall, but very high in a few specific areas like Richmond, some other Bay Area cities, and the Los Angeles area. Most of the state is relatively crime-free.

Likewise for Michigan and Illinois - Crime concentrated in a small number of dense urban areas.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
42. 57% of homicides in cities. 82% of people in cities.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:51 PM
Jul 2012

Rural homicide rates are higher. Your graphic shows how large cities compare to one another. Not how they compare to the rural area.

As someone who grew up on a farm and now live in Chicago, this does not surprise me in the least.

Farming is, of course, a violent activity. 99% of the time I shrug at the "animal cruelty" film. Yes, it looks ugly when you kill an animal. Yes, it looks even uglier when you butcher it. Yes, we used violence to sometimes move animals around. You know why?

When I said, "okay, hogs, everybody in the back of the truck," not one of those fuckers did what they were supposed to.

The individuality and obversely military culture in rural areas there is a certain violent tension in the air.

Conversely, I go out of my way to avoid confrontations in the city under circumstances that I do *not* when "down home". If I toss some asshole out the door down home, that is the end of it. I do that here, I'm getting a visit from the cops. So I am a whole lot more peaceful (though not more relaxed) in the city.

Progressive dog

(6,905 posts)
26. Wow, so mental illness is negatively correlated with gun deaths
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 01:30 PM
Jul 2012

And Texas didn't place first. Keep trying Rick.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
38. These charts shows firearms deaths/injuries, right,
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:29 PM
Jul 2012

but not necessarily murders. I would imagine that in some relatively rural states like Alaska where guns are more prevalent for hunting/protection against wildlife, there might be a fair number of accidental shootings included in our statistic. I know that this household is in a distinct minority in Alaska in that we own no firearms. Many people won't go out in the wilderness or even down to the Kenai to fish without packing a gun in case of a grizzly encounter. I personally have never felt the need, but I understand the impulse.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Geography of Gun Deat...