The Sleazy Case Against Muellers Probe - Bret Stephens
In the matter of Robert Muellers investigation of the Trump-Russia connection, administration apologists make three significant claims in an effort to discredit the former F.B.I. directors work. Lets have a look at them:
First, they insist that the intelligence dossier compiled by British ex-spook Christopher Steele thats one basis for the F.B.I.s own investigation has been discredited or is at best uncorroborated. In the same vein, they claim that Fusion GPS, the research firm that helped pay Steele for the dossier, is little more than a sleazy operator.
The truth about Fusion is that it is paid to dig up dirt by whoever is willing to pay for the dirt. Its business model relies on the Beatles timeless insight that everybodys got something to hide except me and my monkey. But questions about Fusions credibility, client list or aggressive tactics are irrelevant. Fusion brokered the dossier but Steele produced it. Whats relevant is his credibility, the reliability of his sources and the truthfulness of their claims.
These check out. Bill Browder, the anti-Putin campaigner who is an outspoken critic of Fusion, calls Steele a top-class person whose reputation is beyond reproach. At least one of Steeles possible Russian sources was found dead and three others were charged with treason, suggesting, as one Wall Street Journal news account noted, that the Kremlin was cleaning out the moles who had betrayed its hand in last years election meddling.
As for the allegations themselves, former C.I.A. station chief John Sipher laid out the decisive case for their broad truthfulness in a lengthy article in September in Just Security.
Well before any public knowledge of these events, Sipher notes, Steeles report identified multiple elements of the Russian operation including a cyber campaign, leaked documents related to Hillary Clinton, and meetings with Paul Manafort and other Trump affiliates to discuss the receipt of stolen documents. Mr. Steele could not have known that the Russians stole information on Hillary Clinton, or that they were considering means to weaponize them in the U.S. election, all of which turned out to be stunningly accurate.
more
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/03/opinion/robert-mueller-trump-dossier.html