Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,684 posts)
Fri Nov 3, 2017, 04:28 AM Nov 2017

'Exvangelicals': why more religious people are rejecting the evangelical label

https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2017/nov/03/evangelical-christians-religion-politics-trump

By Josiah Hesse at the Guardian

"SNIP........


"I don’t identify myself with that term any more,” Boz Tchividjian said recently. He was talking about being “evangelical”, the movement his grandfather, the Rev Billy Graham, helped popularize in America. “Words matter,” Tchividjian said, “and ‘evangelical’ isn’t like Baptist or Episcopalian, which can be clearly defined. The minute you use that term to someone,, “you’re defined by how they interpret it.”

Tchividjian is among a growing number of religious people and groups in America who have stopped identifying as evangelicals in order to distance themselves from the more extreme elements of Christian society, while remaining true to their principles.

This fall, the 80-year-old Princeton Evangelical Fellowship dropped “evangelical” from its name. William Boyce, executive secretary of what is now the Princeton Christian Fellowship, explained the move, saying: “In recent years … we are seeing that more students either do not recognize or they misunderstand the term evangelical.”

And in a recent interview, Tony Campolo, a pastor and founder of the Red Letter Christians movement, said succinctly what others have alsosaid publicly: “We feel uncomfortable calling ourselves evangelicals any more, because the general public assumes things about us that aren’t true. We are not for capital punishment, we are not pro-war, we don’t hate gays, we’re not anti-feminist.”

........SNIP"
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Exvangelicals': why more religious people are rejecting the evangelical label (Original Post) applegrove Nov 2017 OP
But you're still the looniest of the loonies Drahthaardogs Nov 2017 #1
They broke it get the red out Nov 2017 #2
You can polish a turd all you want, yortsed snacilbuper Nov 2017 #3
Yes. KY_EnviroGuy Nov 2017 #4
Agree with article was raised an evangelical united brethren.. later denomination swallowed by dembotoz Nov 2017 #5
With the exception that we weren't supposed to play cards Maeve Nov 2017 #7
Ain't that the truth...cards dembotoz Nov 2017 #8
Labels matter. There're reasons radical left leaders don't label Hortensis Nov 2017 #6

get the red out

(13,466 posts)
2. They broke it
Fri Nov 3, 2017, 05:06 AM
Nov 2017

They need to own it. Christian leaders like Falwell got their power because a lot of Evangelicals liked what they were selling, now numbers of them are trying to rebrand. Maybe they should have fought this current, hideous brand a bit harder if they didn't want to be looked at as homophobic, sexist, and theocratic. I find it hard to have sympathy.

KY_EnviroGuy

(14,492 posts)
4. Yes.
Fri Nov 3, 2017, 06:14 AM
Nov 2017

When I hear them disown the prosperity gospel and building of megachurches, then they may begin to have some credibility.

In my view, these outfits have done enough damage to our communities and social fabric.. They are the Walmarts of faith.

dembotoz

(16,808 posts)
5. Agree with article was raised an evangelical united brethren.. later denomination swallowed by
Fri Nov 3, 2017, 06:53 AM
Nov 2017

Methodist...
I am a proud eub'er
From what I have seen, eub was about as lefty as the come.
At least my church was.

Maeve

(42,282 posts)
7. With the exception that we weren't supposed to play cards
Fri Nov 3, 2017, 07:29 AM
Nov 2017

I sat down and read the rules one time (and most of the congregation went to euchre parties, so take it for what it was worth)...that was dropped when we became United Methodists. So many of the songs I remember from childhood were about helping others, being thoughtful as well as prayerful, and kindness as the major virtue.

from a former EUB, too!

dembotoz

(16,808 posts)
8. Ain't that the truth...cards
Fri Nov 3, 2017, 07:38 AM
Nov 2017

Remember the scandal when the old foggie senior Sunday school class saw the teenagers playing hearts before an outing.

My church made me the crazy lefty I am today..that and my socialist mom...but she was that way because of the church as well

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
6. Labels matter. There're reasons radical left leaders don't label
Fri Nov 3, 2017, 07:17 AM
Nov 2017

themselves that way, finding it much more advantageous to adopt the newest of an endless series of new labels, and why they are willing to accept the label of reassuring liberalism, even if they despise liberals.

There're reasons why it's critically important that the extremists currently running Congress not be called out for what they are.

And those are the reasons a corrupted media help groups hide behind false labels. Extreme conservatives are called...conservatives. Strong conservatives are called...moderate. Moderates are called...nothing. There is no longer a genuinely moderate conservative faction in congress.

The radical left is undifferentiated by the media. From extreme to radical lite, all are called...liberal. And they're called Democrats. Even when they're not. Even when their very identity is defined by their hostility to Democrats. And if that gives the nation a very negative view of liberals and the Democratic Party, well that is the point and the purpose.

The systematic misuse of language is the biggest tool of deception of all.

In this case, the evangelical problem was that they weren't hiding behind a false label or being mislabeled, just that they damaged it so badly that, as is so typical, the label itself needs changing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Exvangelicals': why more...