Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 08:43 PM Jul 2012

Joe Lieberman trying to pass Cybersecurity Act of 2012. Please oppose.

I just emailed this to my Senators. Feel free to use some-or-all of my words in writing your Senators.


Please oppose the "Cybersecurity Act of 2012," S. 2105, from Joe Lieberman.

It makes an exception to ALL privacy laws.

It allows our emails, passwords, and medical records to be given out without our consent or knowledge.

======
SEC. 702. VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE OF CYBERSECURITY THREAT INDICATORS AMONG PRIVATE ENTITIES.

(a) Authority to Disclose- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any private entity may disclose lawfully obtained cybersecurity threat indicators to any other private entity.
====

The bill will be used to read journalists' emails and identify whistleblowers.

After a newspaper publishes an article about illegal activity by a corporation, the corporation can tell the email-provider of the journalist that the information must have been obtained without authorization from their computers, and therefore they need to read the journalist's emails.

The email-provider could legally give out the journalist's emails in response, and never tell the journalist.

The bill does NOT require a company which shares user's emails, passwords, and medical records in the name of "cybersecurity threat indicators" to ever tell the users.

Real cybersecurity threat information is already shared under existing laws.

The FBI arrests hackers under existing laws.

We don't need a new cybersecurity law.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Joe Lieberman trying to pass Cybersecurity Act of 2012. Please oppose. (Original Post) Eric J in MN Jul 2012 OP
KnR for some sunshine on this ball of pus. alittlelark Jul 2012 #1
Apt description. woo me with science Jul 2012 #8
Bill number updated to S 3414 (NT) Eric J in MN Jul 2012 #2
This is so they can use that beautiful new surveillance center in Utah. woo me with science Jul 2012 #3
Remember the furor over SOPA? woo me with science Jul 2012 #4
Yeah, I wish the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 had the negative public reaction Eric J in MN Jul 2012 #5
We are sleepwalking into fascism. nt woo me with science Jul 2012 #6
Kick. This is important. woo me with science Jul 2012 #7
Thanks for the kick (NT) Eric J in MN Jul 2012 #22
Are these bills intentionally named so they sound good? Pool Hall Ace Jul 2012 #9
You nailed it. And this isn't even the worst name yet. woo me with science Jul 2012 #10
Kick. nt woo me with science Jul 2012 #11
thanks for the kick (NT) Eric J in MN Jul 2012 #15
Kick woo me with science Jul 2012 #12
Kick woo me with science Jul 2012 #13
Kick woo me with science Jul 2012 #14
kr HiPointDem Jul 2012 #16
thanks for the kick (NT) Eric J in MN Jul 2012 #17
Joe Lieberman, trying to inflict as much damage as he can for his swan song. Skidmore Jul 2012 #18
Yeah, Lieberman couldn't just leave quietly. Eric J in MN Jul 2012 #19
Lieberman never met a cyber law he didn't like. GoneOffShore Jul 2012 #20
I'm glad this is his last term. (NT) Eric J in MN Jul 2012 #21

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
4. Remember the furor over SOPA?
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 09:14 AM
Jul 2012

They just keep coming until Americans lose interest and aren't paying attention anymore.

Pool Hall Ace

(5,849 posts)
9. Are these bills intentionally named so they sound good?
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 10:38 AM
Jul 2012

"Ooooh, the Cybersecurity Act -- I want to be more safe online!"

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
10. You nailed it. And this isn't even the worst name yet.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 10:44 AM
Jul 2012

The height in despicable naming was the one that was named to suggest that it was all about preventing child porn:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002197126

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
18. Joe Lieberman, trying to inflict as much damage as he can for his swan song.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 06:18 PM
Jul 2012

November can't come fast enough. If I had enough money, I would buy a round of drinks for everyone on the day his ass hits the road.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
19. Yeah, Lieberman couldn't just leave quietly.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 06:53 PM
Jul 2012

He needs to do lasting damage to our privacy on his way out.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Joe Lieberman trying to p...