Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsElizabeth Warren: The Supreme Court Has An Ethics Problem
The Supreme Court Has An Ethics Problem
Justices on the high court dont have to follow the same code of conduct as they do in lower courts. That needs to change.
By ELIZABETH WARREN
November 01, 2017
A few days before the Supreme Court returned from its summer break, Justice Neil Gorsuch, the courts newest member, attended a luncheon at the Trump International Hotel, where he was to give the keynote address. The location of the speech attracted the attention of dozens of protesters and a number of ethics watchdogs, who noted the apparent conflict of interest posed by Justice Gorsucha Trump nomineekeynoting an event at a hotel whose revenue goes in part to President Trump. That arrangement was bad enough on its own. But there was another potential conflict of interest created by Justice Gorsuchs speaking engagementand it highlights the ongoing ethical issues that threaten the credibility of our nations highest court.
The same morning that Justice Gorsuch gave his speech, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Janus v. AFSCME. This is a case that will determine whether public sector unionswhich represent teachers, nurses, firefighters and police in states and cities across the countrycan collect fees from all employees in the workplaces they represent. Justice Gorsuch is widely expected to deliver the courts deciding vote to strip unions of this ability. A decision along these lines would seriously undercut workers freedom to have a real voice to speak out and fight for higher wages, better benefits and improved working conditions.
Heres the rub. Justice Gorsuchs speech at the Trump hotel was hosted by the Fund for American Studies. And who funds the Fund of American Studies? The Charles Koch Foundation and the Bradley Foundation. The Charles Koch Foundation is dedicated to promoting limited government, free markets and weaker unions; and the Bradley Foundation has worked for decades to, in their own words, reduce the size and power of public sector unions. In fact, the Bradley Foundation helped pay the litigation expenses for Janusthe case in which Justice Gorsuch is likely to be the deciding vote. Think about that: Just as the ink was drying on the courts announcement that it would hear Janus, Justice Gorsuch was off to hobnob with some of the biggest supporters for one side of this important casethe side that wants to deny workers the freedom to build a future that doesnt hang by a thread at the whim of a few billionaires.
This isnt the first time the Supreme Court has strayed over the ethical line. Take a look, for example, at ABC v. Aereo. The court concluded that Aereo, a small television streaming service, had violated the copyright of broadcasters by capturing signals from television stations and retransmitting programming from those stations to the companys subscribers. Time Warnerone of the broadcasters who stood to lose if the court allowed the practicefiled a friend-of-the-court brief arguing that the court should side with the broadcaster. At the time, Chief Justice John Roberts owned as much as $500,000 in Time Warner stock. Despite this blatant conflict of interest, Roberts would not recuse himself from the case. Instead, he joined the majority in effectively killing the small streaming service.
There are plenty of other examples of ethical conflicts. According to Fix the Court, a nonpartisan group focused on increasing accountability and transparency on the Supreme Court, Justices Roberts, Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito owned shares in 53 publicly traded companies as of 2016.
more...
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/01/supreme-court-ethics-problem-elizabeth-warren-opinion-215772?lo=ap_e1
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1652 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Elizabeth Warren: The Supreme Court Has An Ethics Problem (Original Post)
babylonsister
Nov 2017
OP
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)1. You know, Justices can be impeached too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Chase
Chase was lucky.
In the firestorm building around Donald Turd, expect everybody in his circle to get singed.
Chase was lucky.
In the firestorm building around Donald Turd, expect everybody in his circle to get singed.